27 measurements spanning 28 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,077–10,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 00:08
10,198
+4
1 Sept 2026, 18:54
10,194
-6
31 Aug 2026, 17:15
10,200
+3
30 Aug 2026, 20:14
10,197
-4
29 Aug 2026, 21:27
10,201
+11
28 Aug 2026, 21:14
10,190
+8
27 Aug 2026, 21:25
10,182
+29
27 Aug 2026, 00:24
10,153
-1
25 Aug 2026, 21:35
10,154
+3
25 Aug 2026, 00:17
10,151
+7
23 Aug 2026, 12:58
10,144
+14
21 Aug 2026, 23:47
10,130
+16
20 Aug 2026, 14:43
10,114
+7
19 Aug 2026, 12:27
10,107
+7
18 Aug 2026, 13:42
10,100
+7
17 Aug 2026, 12:59
10,093
-7
16 Aug 2026, 04:24
10,100
-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:57
10,101
+1
13 Aug 2026, 05:56
10,100
+4
12 Aug 2026, 03:52
10,096
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.49%
avg views ÷ 10,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
560
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
50 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
24,630
Reactions total
267
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
322 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5433826918765964045
123
38.2%
custom 5260427930701408466
90
28.0%
custom 5260764707677023056
79
24.5%
custom 5249496598982969599
30
9.32%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
12.0%
6 of 50 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
620
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
542
over 43 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdHnfYf
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2SDnjdK3EQK
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2SDnjdPaEYj
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2SDnjdeM53R
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2SDnjdfaH4P
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
2SDnjdkZ9Wj
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
☀️ Подарки за летние воспоминания!
Мы дарим три офлайн-билета тарифа «Стандарт» на конференцию Генконф — там с экспертами разберемся, как сохранять энергию и молодость круглый год.
Участвуют жители Москвы и Московской области.
Чтобы выиграть, просто сыграйте с нами в слова в комментариях. Тема — лето, отдых и перезагрузка. Правила как в «городах»: следующее слово начинается на последнюю букву предыдущего.
Пример:…
Включаем «Зелёный свет» для тех, кто не успел! 🌈
Мы решили дать «Зелёной пятнице» ещё четыре дня. До 31 августа включительно ДНК-тесты и комбо-наборы MyGenetics по-прежнему доступны со скидками до 65%.
Если всё это время присматривались к тесту, сравнивали варианты или откладывали решение на потом — это «потом» официально наступило. Можно начать с одного интересующего направления или выбрать комбо-набор и узнать бо…
Сегодня последний день Зелёной пятницы в MyGenetics 😑
До конца дня можно выбрать одно из трёх ДНК-комбо по специальной цене:
✔️«Веллнесс комбо»
«Веллнесс» + «Витамины»
35 900 ₽ вместо 79 600 ₽
✔️«Акционное комбо»
«Эксперт» + «Нейрогенетика»
32 900 ₽ вместо 75 600 ₽
✔️«Семейное комбо»
Два теста «Эксперт» — для вас и близкого человека.
47 900 ₽ вместо 111 600 ₽
Также при покупке теста «Веллнесс», «Эксперт» или компл…
Витамин D связали с лучшей памятью ☀️
Кроме поддержки костей и иммунитета, "солнечный" витамин может быть связан с более сохранной работой мозга.
🔜 В новом исследовании изучали пожилых людей с нарушениями сна и лёгкими когнитивными нарушениями — состоянием, которое нередко предшествует деменции. Участники, принимавшие 5000 МЕ витамина D в день и больше, набрали почти на четыре балла больше по тесту MoCA, чем те, кт…
«Ну узнаю я особенности своих генов — и что дальше?»
Именно так наша клиентка относилась к ДНК-тестам до того, как получила собственные результаты. А после обнаружила несколько особенностей, которые заставили иначе посмотреть на привычные рекомендации по питанию, нутриентам и физической активности.
Какие именно — рассказали в карточках на примере ее личного опыта.
Переходите по ссылке https://mrqz.me/67dcee8a42669…
Вы просили – мы сделали!
Ещё одно предложение в рамках Зелёной пятницы😍
ДНК-тест "Минералы" в подарок:
при покупке любого ДНК-теста от 19 900 руб. или ДНК-теста "Происхождение" (кроме всех комплектов).
Успевайте воспользоваться до 27 августа включительно ➡️ https://clck.ru/3VLdhv
Реклама, ООО "НЦГИ"
ИНН 5402545966
erid: 2SDnjdkZ9Wj
Ценим ваше доверие и благодарим за отметки💗
Еще несколько историй в копилочку MyGenetics.
Если вы ещё не выбрали ДНК-тест, сейчас самое время 😉
custom 54338269187659640457
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @MyGeneticsru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пиво помогает быстрее восстановиться после тренировки?
Правда38%
Миф63%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MyGeneticsru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mygenetics named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MyGenetics | Генетика для жизни” (@MyGeneticsru), 10,198 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyGeneticsru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.