Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виктория Моисеева

Channel

Виктория Моисеева

@koffkamk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,557subscribers

-819 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396354997
TypeChannel
Username@koffkamk
DescriptionВсё про бьюти от профи Сотрудничество 💌 [email protected] . А+ Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц : https://knd.gov.ru/license? id=673724de569da61033441faa&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created1 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/koffkamk

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

24,55725,37624,966.56 August 2026 — 25,376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,338 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,316 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,302 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,291 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,280 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,268 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,253 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,223 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,212 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,202 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,168 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,153 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,144 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,119 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,102 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,079 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,056 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,045 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,042 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,040 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,030 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,020 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,014 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,011 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,002 subscribers7 September 2026 — 24,975 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,950 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,929 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,915 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,894 subscribers18 September 2026 — 24,868 subscribers30 September 2026 — 24,768 subscribers6 October 2026 — 24,730 subscribers10 October 2026 — 24,708 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,689 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,677 subscribers16 October 2026 — 24,667 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,657 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,654 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,650 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,640 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,635 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,626 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,624 subscribers24 October 2026 — 24,617 subscribers25 October 2026 — 24,614 subscribers26 October 2026 — 24,613 subscribers27 October 2026 — 24,607 subscribers28 October 2026 — 24,606 subscribers29 October 2026 — 24,602 subscribers30 October 2026 — 24,599 subscribers31 October 2026 — 24,590 subscribers1 November 2026 — 24,588 subscribers2 November 2026 — 24,577 subscribers3 November 2026 — 24,568 subscribers4 November 2026 — 24,564 subscribers5 November 2026 — 24,557 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net -819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,434–25,499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 20:4824,557-7
4 Nov 2026, 18:3724,564-4
3 Nov 2026, 20:5124,568-9
2 Nov 2026, 18:0624,577-11
1 Nov 2026, 16:0624,588-2
31 Oct 2026, 12:3624,590-9
30 Oct 2026, 15:4824,599-3
29 Oct 2026, 12:3024,602-4
28 Oct 2026, 12:0824,606-1
27 Oct 2026, 11:4924,607-6
26 Oct 2026, 12:3724,613-1
25 Oct 2026, 15:4624,614-3
24 Oct 2026, 15:5824,617-7
23 Oct 2026, 17:0524,624-2
22 Oct 2026, 17:1924,626-9
21 Oct 2026, 12:3724,635-5
20 Oct 2026, 06:3524,640-10
19 Oct 2026, 03:4524,650-4
18 Oct 2026, 04:0024,654-3
17 Oct 2026, 01:4524,657first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.9%
avg views ÷ 24,557 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,090
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held46 (28 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total92,150
Reactions total2,347
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈353
Links
≈311

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
46m 41s
Average length
2m 13s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,384 reactions across 46 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,84262.3%
🔥2,13822.8%
👍4514.81%
😍2552.72%
🤣2162.30%
😱1461.56%
🥰1171.25%
🤩820.874%
👏450.48%
🤯340.362%
🎉290.309%
👌270.288%
🤬20.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.17%
1 of 46 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
8,290
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,360
over 45 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjckKpcb114 September 202614 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC≈3,890 views200 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤98🔥85😍12🤩5

27 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈6,920 views142 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Такой смешанный обзор получится, но я скажу 😂 Я абсолютно никак отношусь к Сабрине Карпентер, но эта штука безумно вкусная, идеальный лимонный пирог🤤 и сделали на нее скидку в пол цены, подарили косметичку, но! Держится пол часа . Ну минут 40. На одежде подольше, но я готова перелить в атомайзер и носить с собой, настолько мне вкусно 🍰🫠

❤96👍31😍15

23 Oct 2026, 17:04 UTC≈8,940 views166 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ну что ж. Рубрика очень хотелось отнести люксу денег, чтобы не загнулся, но не буду . Еротишный инжир мне не очень понравился, бабкин, Ебинифуме (простите) еще та херь… и тут анонсировали шоколад 🍫 Ну заявка же на победу . И ? Мне «ну так средне» . На четверочку, полноразмер точно брать не стоит. Он не уникальный, не прям вкусный, не прям стойкий. Ну нормальный. Я жду , когда будет в отливантах и то маленького мне хв…

❤146👍20

22 Oct 2026, 07:46 UTC≈7,360 views181 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Что нашлаааа! Рыла на маркетплейсах и нарыла . Румяна для лица CheeseBerry - 207 Milk Tea Nude Brown , o 4367566663 Румяна-помада JOOCYEE - J02 Tipsy Wine Brown, 3183102924

❤138🔥34🎉7👍2

20 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC≈8,120 views86 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Антиэйдж хочется, ретинол не хочется (или нельзя), что делать? Хочу сияние и уменьшение морщинок, платить «ретиноловую цену» в виде периода адаптации, рисков и сухости не хочу. Часто получаю от вас такой запрос . Что тут скажешь - тогда потихоньку используйте кислотные тоники и из альтернатив ретинола придумано наукой только одно - бакучиол, он же растительный аналог ретинола. Не токсичный, хорошо переносится кожей, …

❤79👍6😱1

19 Oct 2026, 16:05 UTC≈7,400 views159 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Как сказала мне вчера подруга : не знаю, что ты сейчас делаешь с волосами, но продолжай ! Внимание, волосы без укладки. И волосы мои пористые, чуть вьющиеся и сейчас влажно, они всегда пушились и будут пушиться в такую погоду, но сейчас они блестят. Без фена и утюжка. Я сейчас тестирую и уже влюбилась линейку для ухода за волосами с КЕРАТИНОМ и эффект разглаживания и блеска я заметила уже с первого применения. Что оч…

❤106🔥33😍20

17 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC≈7,870 views357 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Дишман, по которому я тащусь и не могу перестать скупать еще цвета 🫠 - блески-сыворотки Эссенс до 300р - помады-муссы как у люкса, только от Перрипера, в долгой доставке маркетплейсов по 700 р - бронзеры Эссенс без талька, но с текстурой как у люкса и очень хорошим нанесением тоже по 300 - карандаши Эссенс 8h (О чем узнать невозможно, ибо их уродуют и обклеивать так… ну да ладно, их цветов 20 и у меня все, кроме тре…

❤246🔥76😍35

16 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈8,570 views345 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Красивый вчера был вечер 😍 me VS новая коллекция Артдеко. Ну моя! ♥️ ну мы же созданы друг для друга, ну ботега какая-то. Ну стииль.

❤202🔥104😍36👍3

15 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC≈6,400 views70 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Я счастливая. Каждый день. Потому что сама себе это организовываю. Я уже просыпаюсь счастливой. Меня часто упрекают в том, что я живу как хочу, кайфую от жизни, такая стрекоза, всё бы мне легкое, красивое и приятное. А почему нет? скажите мне! Зачем создавать себе неудобство, если можно создавать удобство? Жизнь, в которой ты хочешь радостно просыпаться и играться в красивые штучки завтра. Условия жизни и сна, которы…

❤56👍14

14 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC≈5,600 views140 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

И полнейшее разочарование под влиянием отзывов на маркетплейсах. В свежем видео я говорила, что хочу купить ее как минимум ради банки и потестить концепт «мицелярная с магнием». Такой плохой мицелярки у меня еще не было - щиплет и плохо смывает. 👎🏻 Даже в качестве ночного тоника нет смысла оставлять. Вылила. Покажу в пустых банках и буду использовать в качестве дозатора своей столь же дишманской, но хорошей Эвелин

❤87👍34👌12👏7

14 Oct 2026, 20:54 UTC≈5,310 views141 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Мои покупки под влиянием Виктории Моисеевой. Сама себе наинфлюэнсила, получается . 😅😂 Пока снимала пустые баночки и обзоры- вспомнила какие эти средства хорошие, пришлось повторить. - защитный восстанавливающий крем Доктор Алсеа . Не так божественен как все говорят, но всё равно 10/10 - самый стойкий из сияющий тонов не вызывающих прыщи, купила заварную версию - протекторы волос в краску - спрей для объема на мокрые …

❤108👍22😍11

8 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC≈7,450 views148 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Также я хотела сказать, что я шафраноманьячка

❤123🔥23🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @koffkamk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЮЛЯ ЗНАЕТ
@beautyfrend · 6,462
#1
RedAutumn
@olyaredautumn · 107,360
#2
В женской шкуре
@elya_bulochka · 48,345
#3
Ксения Вебер
@xeniaweber · 30,558
#4
AnastasiaWater
@anastasiawater · 11,740
#5
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,640
#6
Бьюти суета
@klavagolman · 51,106
#7
Крис печатает...
@krisistyping · 52,193
#8
Роскошь бутиков
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 150,108
#9
✨Катерина Давыдова✨
@kdvmua · 5,103
#10
IRINAMEYK
@irinameyk · 133,291
#11
БАНКИ & ТЮБИКИ
@bankiitubiki · 20,362
#12
очень много косметики
@myatnayajvachka · 25,807
#13
Таня Красиво
@tanyakrasivo · 1,670
#14
1001 маска
@maska1001 · 21,204
#15
Сказки_златовласки
@skazki_zlatovlaskii · 16,935
#16
Записки Мейкап Артистки
@likaglazkova · 12,695
#17
Та самая хранительница
@kosmetan_fr · 25,924
#18
BEAUTY HUB
@immelybeauty · 22,950
#19
Болтушка от прыщей
@sovaznaet · 23,156
#20
Натали Ива
@beautyiva · 7,646
#21
Kate Motovilova
@kate_motovilovaa · 67,671
#22
Вася в банке 🫙
@smpl_skin · 4,354
#23
Elena Bogdanovich
@bogdanovich_elena · 116,003
#24
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,548
#25
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,627,372
#26
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 349,316
#27
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 54,762
#28
Караван Бьюти Ченэл
@fursanastasia · 46,266
#29
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,837
#30
PILETSKAYA
@piletskayabeauty · 94,724
#31
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,529
#32
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 94,388
#33
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,052
#34
RISHA MAKEUP
@rishamakeup · 29,176
#35
Караван Ахуительных Историй
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,478
#36
Беседуем с Луизой
@massage_louisa · 523
#37
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ
@naumita · 58,788
#38
BLACK MORION
@blackmorion · 28,559
#39
Alina FlyCloud
@alinaflycloud · 11,335
#40
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,507
#41
Nastya Nami channel
@nastya_nami1 · 18,288
#42
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 119,754
#43
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,426
#44
ГЕВ МУА
@gevmua · 13,774
#45
BEAUTYDRUGS
@beautydrugsru · 2,486
#46
Уходом единым
@uhodom_edinym · 63,553
#47
FLACON MAGAZINE
@flacon_mag · 58,214
#48
Без принципов, но с сумкой
@kudriashovaa · 22,841
#49
Кожаная Госпожа
@skingospozha · 32,759
#50
Marina Luxious
@marinaluxious · 35,404
#51
Regina's treasury 💄🎬 о косметике, ароматах и кино
@reginastreasury · 3,331
#52
Утомленная банками | Beauty by Maya
@beautybymaya · 13,151
#53
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 184,883
#54
Катя Конасова
@konasovatut · 77,007
#55
ADmakeup
@AnnaDyuryaginamakeup · 1,992
#56
SHIKstudio
@shikcosmetics · 52,109
#57
Вокруг банок
@vokrug_banok · 16,772
#58
Ксеша Мел
@kseshamel · 3,684
#59
Marina Golomazdina
@marinagolomazdina · 119,039
#60
Пополняю косметички
@olyssblog · 26,620
#61
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,717
#62
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,928
#63
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,001
#64
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,443
#65
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,131
#66
Джонни детка
@Johnny4ekak · 65,444
#67
Бабкин Престол 2.0
@babkin_prestol · 67,272
#68
VODA
@Avodonaeva · 144,006
#69
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 156,667
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IRINAMEYK
@irinameyk · 133,291
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
RedAutumn
@olyaredautumn · 107,360
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Ксения Вебер
@xeniaweber · 30,558
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Дневник Бо Хян
@Bonyabohyun · 52,013
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
TOMA FATALIEVA
@fatalievaprobeauty · 38,798
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
RISHA MAKEUP
@rishamakeup · 29,176
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
Shikstudio| Наталья Шик
@shikstudio · 56,428
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
Rudovans
@rudovans · 37,129
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
Алла Бьюти
@alla_bty · 62,842
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Svetsong
@svetsongs · 26,654
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виктория Моисеева” (@koffkamk), 24,557 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koffkamk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.