Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,382–26,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:36
26,167
+208
15 Sept 2026, 21:58
25,959
+3
14 Sept 2026, 02:17
25,956
-15
12 Sept 2026, 05:59
25,971
+16
9 Sept 2026, 22:41
25,955
-79
6 Sept 2026, 15:37
26,034
-88
4 Sept 2026, 06:58
26,122
-29
2 Sept 2026, 16:44
26,151
+29
1 Sept 2026, 12:34
26,122
+239
31 Aug 2026, 13:26
25,883
+63
30 Aug 2026, 15:37
25,820
+33
29 Aug 2026, 17:06
25,787
+24
28 Aug 2026, 20:08
25,763
+24
27 Aug 2026, 22:48
25,739
+34
27 Aug 2026, 01:18
25,705
+80
26 Aug 2026, 03:54
25,625
+141
25 Aug 2026, 07:25
25,484
-13
24 Aug 2026, 04:19
25,497
-16
22 Aug 2026, 10:38
25,513
-4
20 Aug 2026, 00:03
25,517
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 26,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,520
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
81 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
70,430
Reactions total
3,522
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,655 reactions across 76 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,067
62.8%
🔥
1,183
12.3%
😁
1,067
11.1%
👍
611
6.33%
🍾
241
2.50%
😱
207
2.14%
custom 5375450857150102431
124
1.28%
💅
92
0.953%
💯
63
0.653%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 80 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kosmetan_fr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всегда любопытно, как марки с явным собственным ДНК перерабатывают тренды.
Zadig & Voltaire в This is Her! Burning Love предлагает своё прочтение фисташки. Представьте, что вы заказываете апероль, а бармен деликатно сообщает, что на улице уже свежо, и у него есть для вас что-то особенное и по погоде и приносит вам коктейль с фисташковым ликёром на взбитом миндальном молоке с овсяным печеньем и жареными каштанами на …
У меня относительно розыгрышей правило такое:
Проводить редко и только с каналами, которые люблю сама. С этим так и вышло. Участвуя в нём вы не только получаете возможность выиграть классные призы, но и подписки, которые вам пригодятся.
Карину @smelldate знает 90% моих читателей. Мы дружим лет эдак сто, само наличие моего блога это отчасти результат её влияния. Она поддержала меня на старте на Ютубе, чем замотивиро…
В Саратове зашла в магазин Ив Роше на проспекте и оказалась в своих 00-х 💄
Там всё абсолютно также. Сезонные серии, уход и парфюмерия, справа от входа салон красоты бренда. Посмотрела парфюмерные новинки – они сильно уступают запускам 00-х и 10-х, где были Кокон, So Elixir, Ода любви, Минг Шу. Эвиденс некрасиво переодели, но сам аромат всё также прекрасен.
Вдохнула его и нет больше Гуровой Елены, взрослой женщины с…
Традиционная рубрика выходного дня #до_дна 🧴
Шампунь для окрашенных волос Hairmeet вязкий, мягкий, действительно медленнее вымывл цвет и совсем не сушил, повторю.
Кондиционер Silkening Hairmeet у меня далеко не первый. Очень люблю за стеклянный эффект на волосах, они после него увлажнённые и красиво блестят. И шампунь, и кондей беру на сайте Fabao с моим промо Kosmetan.
Вернулась к любимой из не очень дорогих маск…
Понятия не имею, как мимо меня могла пройти такая прелесть, как коллекция Lucky Charms Carolina Herrera!
У меня с шармами и сменным футляром есть от них помада и я её обожаю. Теперь закажу все ароматы серии, до которых дотянусь. На US Mall уже нашла семпл-сет из 6 ароматов (кодовое слово Kosmetan), остальное поищу на Аллюре.
Вопросы «когда вы поменяете дизайн?» к бренду Гельтек я слышала даже на нашем выезде в парк птиц от других блогеров и экспертов, не говоря уже об обсуждениях клиентов.
И вот лёд тронулся! Бренд выпустил несколько своих хитов в новом дизайне — формулы внутри прежние, а банки другие. Вам какие больше нравятся?
❤️ Новые
🔥 Старые
Есть у меня подружки, которые не увлекались ароматами, пока не познакомились со мной.
И вот одна из них задала мне интересный вопрос:
«Чем ты себя приводишь в чувство после тестирования так себе духов?». И тут есть, что обсудить.
Как вы в надеюсь заметили, в этом году я пробую вообще разное, и далеко не всё доставляет мне удовольствие. Чтобы в этом затянувшемся эксперименте сохранить интерес к парфюмерии, я сбрасыв…
Друзья, все мы знаем, что сейчас происходит со складами маркетплейсов.
Пострадало множество прекрасных брендов, с которыми я работаю и искренне люблю. Мы попросили их рассказать о скидках и промокодах на уцелевшую продукцию, чтобы они могли спасти товарные остатки, а мы выгодно закупиться.
Mesomatrix
AVGUST10 на WB. Обязательно присмотритесь к средствам с пептидами, особенно к моей любимой сыворотке BTA PEPTIDE, ме…
Бренд Glossier в очередной раз мне напомнил, что полноценное знакомство с ароматом возможно исключительно с кожи.
Уже несколько месяцев я стараюсь тестировать ароматы именно так, потому что случаи, когда на блоттере ерунда, а с кожи пение ангелов и наоборот не редки, тут тоже так вышло.
You
Первый запуск бреда мне давно симпатичен. Это классические «не духи, я сама по себе так пахну». Мускусный аромат с пудровым ир…
❤136👍36🔥14💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @kosmetan_fr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kosmetan_fr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мать флаконов @smelldate · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Я вас не слышу! @vasneslyshno · 50,332 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Randewoo.ru @randewoo_official · 67,192 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA @angermolaeva · 78,602 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы @beauty_goldman · 22,025 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин @sciscent · 35,574 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Виктория Моисеева @koffkamk · 24,868 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
Пополняю косметички @olyssblog · 26,724 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Зашиваюсь, но пишу @zakharova_studio · 23,699 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
Бесит всё @beauty_besit · 28,890 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
TERLETSKAYA LIVE @terletskayalive · 37,059 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Ксения Вебер @xeniaweber · 31,019 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
очень много косметики @myatnayajvachka · 26,105 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
BEAUTY BY GUBICHM @gubichmmmmm · 24,875 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
BeautyAD Anna Dycheva @Beauty_AD · 26,084 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Косметический маньяк @cosmetman_com · 27,021 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Гели всея Руси @geltek_skincare · 39,780 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
suharevstyle @suharevstyle · 25,620 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Правьте балом! @beautyarch · 22,719 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
Болтушка от прыщей @sovaznaet · 23,258 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Geltek за стеклом @geltek_cosmetics · 38,613 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Та самая хранительница” (@kosmetan_fr), 26,167 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosmetan_fr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.