Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for пахнет претензией

Channel

пахнет претензией

@redheadsmells

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,987subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262750965
TypeChannel
Username@redheadsmells
Created12 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/redheadsmells

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,9866,0416,013.57 August 2026 — 6,041 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,041 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,040 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,034 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,026 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,023 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,021 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,011 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,004 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,996 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,994 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,986 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,991 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,987 subscribers5,9877 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,978–6,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:205,987-4
14 Sept 2026, 22:385,991+5
11 Sept 2026, 05:575,986-8
2 Sept 2026, 01:425,994-2
30 Aug 2026, 06:275,996-8
27 Aug 2026, 11:276,004-7
24 Aug 2026, 21:236,011-10
21 Aug 2026, 00:256,021-2
17 Aug 2026, 13:576,023-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:466,026-8
10 Aug 2026, 19:386,034-6
7 Aug 2026, 19:406,040-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:306,041no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:246,041first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

767 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35946.8%
🔥14218.5%
🤣11314.7%
❤‍🔥425.48%
💘374.82%
😍192.48%
👍172.22%
💔111.43%
💯91.17%
🥰70.913%
🎃40.522%
🤪40.522%
30.391%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 767 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC326 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня играла в мафию в 100BON Cacao Fleur d’Oranger. Люблю это какао на молоке с соленой карамелью. На работе тоже оценили, причем и женская, и мужская половины. Коллега даже полилась им перед уходом.

24

11 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC579 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У корейского бренда SARANGHAEYO понравился аромат с чистенькими нероли и яркими цитрусами — 51. Drive To Sunburst. Напоминает любимый Tom Ford Neroli Portifino, а с учетом цены за 100 мл в лаймовой сети так вообще супер вариант.

10🔥6

8 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,060 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Красивое🍋💙

35💔11😍6

5 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,340 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мишка с мишкой😄

34🤣7🥰7

5 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,410 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

До нас доехали новые мишки Moschino🧸 И они преотличнейшие! Toy 2 Yummy пахнет сочным не очень сладким мандарином и постирочной чистотой, а Gummy — фруктово-сливочными леденцами с бешеной диффузией.

47

4 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,150 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Ну и вопрос вам: что предпочитаете?

  1. Офис15%
  2. Удаленка41%
  3. Гибрид44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,020 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первый офисный день за месяц📕📌 Решила не травмировать коллег и выбрала мой самый комплиментарный аромат — BDK Parfums Tubereuse Imperiale. Комплиментов сегодня не получила, но зато сама кайфовала от этой персиковой туберозы🙂‍↔️

39🔥25

3 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,130 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Еще на встрече попробовали интересный RAER 07 Orris + Cacao. Какао здесь достаточно необычное, с горьким шоколадом, грибами и осенней опавшей листвой.

🔥23153

1 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,320 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bottega Veneta Ricordami Конфеты Lindt из белого шоколада со страчателлой. Флакон офигенный😍 Fakoshima Aerodynamic Древесина, свежий воздух, хвоя и минеральность. На мой вкус, выделяется из всего бренда, такого еще не было. Из знакомого вижу пересечение с Etro Musk Eau de Parfum.

🔥3231👍4

31 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,590 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все здесь❤️‍🔥💋

❤‍🔥42💘12🤣2

31 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,370 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С пятницей, мои драгоценные💖 #oldbutgold

37💘17

29 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,370 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мрачной погоде мрачные духи🌫️ На самом деле, с годами Perles de Lalique мне кажется все менее мрачным. Сегодня, например, я в нем отчетливо слышу клюкву, точнее морс из нее, да такой концентрированный. А все потому, что ягодный аспект свойственен сочетанию роза-пачули🥀

39👍13🔥11💘8

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @redheadsmells. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTCAnonymous Poll245 voters

Ну и вопрос вам: что предпочитаете?

  1. Офис15%
  2. Удаленка41%
  3. Гибрид44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Я вас не слышу!
@vasneslyshno · 50,332
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA
@angermolaeva · 78,602
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Та самая хранительница
@kosmetan_fr · 26,167
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Randewoo.ru
@randewoo_official · 67,192
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин
@sciscent · 35,574
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы
@beauty_goldman · 22,025
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“пахнет претензией” (@redheadsmells), 5,987 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redheadsmells.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.