О пахнущем от парфюмера и химика Кирилла Хайкина.
Купить мои ароматы Khaikin: https://khaikin.store
Реклама, сотрудничество и консультации: @Khaikin_PR
Канал бренда: @khaikin_store
Образование: Химфак МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова
РКН: clck.ru/3MBnfm
Created
15 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 72 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,543–35,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 21:36
35,771
-1
16 Oct 2026, 23:14
35,772
+9
16 Oct 2026, 01:19
35,763
+1
14 Oct 2026, 21:49
35,762
-11
13 Oct 2026, 14:36
35,773
+6
5 Oct 2026, 12:15
35,767
-5
29 Sept 2026, 11:15
35,772
+198
18 Sept 2026, 02:39
35,574
-29
15 Sept 2026, 20:36
35,603
-20
14 Sept 2026, 03:57
35,623
-5
12 Sept 2026, 14:18
35,628
-15
10 Sept 2026, 14:37
35,643
+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:17
35,642
-19
4 Sept 2026, 12:58
35,661
-10
3 Sept 2026, 02:23
35,671
-9
2 Sept 2026, 01:53
35,680
-15
1 Sept 2026, 04:26
35,695
-13
31 Aug 2026, 06:53
35,708
+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:24
35,707
-1
29 Aug 2026, 13:13
35,708
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 35,771 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,880
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
90 (27 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
166,020
Reactions total
6,614
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 21:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,440
Videos
≈309
Links
≈731
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 58s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,283 reactions across 90 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
9,398
51.4%
👍
2,870
15.7%
🤣
2,595
14.2%
custom 5465170327371814825
2,105
11.5%
💋
590
3.23%
😱
414
2.26%
🗿
170
0.93%
🍌
71
0.388%
🫡
70
0.383%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 90 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sciscent. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 90 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.22%
2 of 90 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,360
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,570
over 88 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGq1jSH
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2W5zFJ4Gu3P
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Продолжая разговор о турецких полках…
Там даже сыр с лавандой продают! Правда, сам сыр голландский — Landana.
По вкусу — как будто я ем лаванду с сыром, пряностями и… шампиньонами. Нежная сливочность гауды и сенная, травянистая сторона лаванды с подчеркнутой грибной стороной, которая очень присуща маслу лаванды.
В составе ароматизатор не указан — есть сами сушёные цветы лаванды. Цветки содержат эфирное масло, мног…
Сегодня этому каналу исполнилось 5 лет.
Фотография из того времени, когда я ещё был студентом на химическом факультете МГУ, параллельно работал в лаборатории, а ночами в общаге главного здания МГУ писал сюда посты.
Есть тут люди, которые читают канал с самого начала?
Понял, что вам срочно нужна подборка ароматов на осень. Таких, чтобы согревали не хуже батареи.
Это она, кстати.
Все пять флаконов есть в каталоге Рандеву. И, кстати, необязательно сразу покупать большие флаконы — некоторые можно попробовать в миниатюрах и пробниках. А мой личный промокод 10IZ даст скидку 10% на любой заказ.
Guerlain Tobacco Honey — густой, засахаренный липовый мёд, причём с совершенно удивительно…
Шок! Роза и лаванда на полках!!!
Подумал я, увидев огромное количество розовых и лавандовых отдушек в косметике и бытовой химии. Но, в целом, шок быстро спал — я был не в России. А роза для Турции, как и для Франции, Италии, Марокко и Болгарии, — нестареющая классика с многовековыми традициями в парфюмерии и косметике.
Лаванда изредка встречается у нас на полках в косметическом масс-маркете, но роза — значительно р…
Новая неделя — новая победа!
Бренд Khaikin, а конкретно парфюмерная вода «нарциссовая роща», победил в номинации «парфюмерия и парфюмированные косметические средства» премии «Моя Косметика».
Премия организуется Российской парфюмерно-косметической ассоциацией.
Награду снова получал Дима, наш операционный директор, из медового месяца мы вернулись только поздно ночью.
Очень рады победе, и продолжаем работать!
А, между прочим, Beaufort, сами того не ведая, начали делать неогурманику ещё в далеком 2018.
Rake & Ruin от Beaufort — это чисто смесь адыгейского и козьего сыров, сваренных в агонии в аду. Черный коптящий дым, пряности, смолы, тлеющая трава и мокрая земля. Провокационненько.
Круассаны и макаруны — ВСЁ. Гурманика добралась до кимчи. И грибов. И икры.
Очередное подтверждение тому, что гурманика — это уже давно не только про сладкое, а в целом про съедобное.
CPL Aromas показали коллекцию, вдохновлённую азиатской кухней.
Kimchi Cologne — одеколон с аккордом кимчи. Классическую свежесть колоня предлагают сочетать с ферментированным характером корейской капусты и имбирём.
В той же коллекци…
Не пришлось долго ждать колу без кофеина в РФ. Кажется, только вчера я впервые попробовал ее в Ницце.
И оригинальную колу привезли, и уже, оказывается, добрый сделали свою версию!
Повторюсь, что кофеин никак не влияет на вкус колы, вещество практически безвкусное. Может, слегка горьковатое.
Splat — молодцы!
Их гели для душа Solzao стоят в турецком Каше и конкурируют с такими брендами как Palmolive, La Petit Marseillais…
По словам консультанта, продаются хорошо.
Понятно, кем и чем вдохновлялись, но зато продается. Отдушки, кстати, в большинстве своём — не копии «в лоб». И талантливо подбирали их в России. Я даже знаю, кто, но вам не скажу.
Когда летел кубарем с турецкой горы, подумал, что не зря взял с собой Персея
Он прекрасно продезинфицировал мои раны! А вообще, тащил его, чтобы сфотографировать красиво в горах, но сделать это, конечно же, забыл.
Вдобавок раненое место стало благоухать кожуркой грейпфрута, розовым перцем, прозрачным ветивером и колкой амброй.
Стойким и шлейфовым цитрусом, которых не так много на рынке.
🤣138❤🔥40😱35custom 546517032737181482516👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @sciscent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Parf Scriptum | Иван Якимов @parfscriptum · 14,219#1
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!! @sashaonline · 86,311#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подержите мой шлейф @Perfumeritta · 20,519 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
Я вас не слышу! @vasneslyshno · 49,948 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Что-то на томфордовском @tf_love · 21,656 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
Мать флаконов @smelldate · 31,840 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Богдан и его нос по ветру™ @hearthesmell · 19,304 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 September 2026
BeautyAD Anna Dycheva @Beauty_AD · 26,133 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Randewoo.ru @randewoo_official · 68,219 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
Та самая хранительница @kosmetan_fr · 25,631 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин” (@sciscent), 35,771 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sciscent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
