Channel
@nousentons
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,462subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001309142325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nousentons |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nousentons |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 1,462 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 1,463 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 1,462 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 1,461 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,459 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 1,458 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 1,459 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,457 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,454 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 1,454 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
357 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 159 | 44.5% | |
| 😁 | 103 | 28.9% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 11.5% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 9.24% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 2.80% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 2.24% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nousentons. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
К слову, про бергамот, сегодня нюхали всякие любопытные сырьевые, в том числе ректифицированное масло бергамота из Калабрии, это специалитет компании, в которой я работаю (Mane) один из. Особенность в том, что в этом масле низкое содержание фуранокумаринов, которые отдельная попаболь для парфюмеров, ибо в том числе из-за них, родимых, цитрусовые масла очень сильно лимитированы нормами, а вот такой особенный бергамот…
❤11👍7🔥3
Всем, кто помогал мне искать варенье из бергамота, низкий поклон. Я его нашла, но не отчиталась. Смоталась в прекрасный Турет-Сюр-Луп, который как-то вообще оказался хорошим и пустым, почистил мне голову даже, кхе-кхе, и в тамошнем Флориане нашла все в количествах и теперь и цитрусовые запасы, в том числе бергамотовые ❤️ А кондитер их на нашего парфюмера похож, канонического.
❤6🍓4
До чего дошел прогресс, до невиданных чудес… У нас тут, в Дубае, запустили нечто среднее между духами, кремом и таблетками, развевающими туман в головушке… с пептидами. 300 долларов и вы хорошо пахнете, не стареете и обладаете чистым сознанием с высокой способностью к концентрации. Такие дела… Подробности по ссылке https://shop.longevium.clinic/products/focus
😁17⚡7❤4
И правда…
😁28❤9
Максанс очень клевый 💚
❤12👍4
Video, posted without a caption
😁27
Up At Dawn Maison Martin Margiela А кто-нибудь обратил внимание? Это снова роза. Современная, розоксидная, земляная и рваная. Рваная потому что роза отдельно, а пачули отдельно. Но что-то в этом есть, красивое и современное, колкое и яркое. Я, признаться, люблю этот дом. Ну знаете, туфельки их ношу, и бренд духов мне тоже нравится, мне они нравятся со времен untitled про гальбанум, видимо, это очень мое, такой во…
❤18👍6
Ну и сегодня я решила не требовать от себя слишком многого, слава богам, была только одна встреча за день, а значит, у меня еще остался какой-то запал на дуракаваляние
❤27👍6🔥3😁2
Wild Vetiver Creed Что-то в нём меня зацепило, разглядываю уже который день. Это такая зелёная-зелёная роза. Будто сады на крыше гермесовские смешали с гибискусом от Кривелли, и все положили, включая смородину, но тут еще и очень древесно.
❤21🍓6🔥4
Быть интересным человеком сложно, физически и психоэмоционально, и как-будто нынче это подменяют личным брендом, как социальный интеллект и эрудицию подменяют рилсами. Да и тексты уже писать незачем, теперь их пишут AI. Личного бренда у меня нет, а личности - не знаю, не мне судить, но я заметила, что в любой непонятной ситуации, когда решаешь оставаться просто собой, становится чуточку легче, хотя и это, почему-то,…
❤43🔥9👍5⚡1
Вот так бредешь по офису, а там «не трогайте волосы пожалуйста» Так и живем.
😁29👍5❤1
И снова в эфире рубрика «туалеты Дубая»
🔥22❤7🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nousentons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Выше нос” (@nousentons), 1,462 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nousentons.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.