Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,052–3,096 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 15:42
3,091
+22
15 Sept 2026, 11:59
3,069
-4
11 Sept 2026, 13:57
3,073
-1
6 Sept 2026, 23:02
3,074
+4
2 Sept 2026, 16:03
3,070
+4
30 Aug 2026, 11:06
3,066
+7
27 Aug 2026, 04:59
3,059
+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:09
3,058
+1
20 Aug 2026, 08:46
3,057
-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:36
3,060
-4
14 Aug 2026, 04:15
3,064
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:51
3,062
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:16
3,063
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
455 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
219
48.1%
❤🔥
102
22.4%
🔥
100
22.0%
👍
19
4.18%
🍾
5
1.10%
🤣
4
0.879%
🤗
3
0.659%
💘
2
0.44%
🙊
1
0.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 455 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
695
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
556
over 6 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHvoCXj
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
“On the Rose again” Aphorismes by Dominique Ropion - самая перечная роза из всех, какие мне когда-либо доводилось обонять.
Она настолько плотная и густая, что ощущаешь её как конфитюр, который перед употреблением надо чуть подогреть, иначе, зачерпывая его, погнёшь рукоятку ложки.
От перца аж щекочет в носу, а кардамон и анис только подогревают этот жар.
Это несомненный восток, конечно же.
Роза почти черного цвета, н…
Royaume des Lumières (Королевство света) Serge Lutens
Состоялся тренинг по работе - и вот, несу красоту, спешу рассказать вам.
Ведь коллекция чудесно красивая, а красоту-то мы любим, ох, как любим!
5 ароматов о слиянии Востока и Запада, о стыке двух эпох, о самом прекрасном, что было и есть в них.
О слиянии этих эпох, когда красота, сила духа, разум и чувственность достигли своего апогея, найдя своё отражение в иск…
Вдогонку недавнему стриму о японском нишевом бренде Parfum Satori расскажу немного о том, что такое сосуды Chatsubo, в которые Satori Osawa наливает некоторые из своих ароматов в концентрации Extrait и продаёт за очень-очень дорого.
3 первых фото - как раз эти самые chatsubo bottles от Parfum Satori.
Корень «cha» говорит нам о том, что это имеет отношение к чаю.
И это истинная правда: в таких сосудах ранее в Японии …
Для тех, кто читает канал давно, не секрет, что я давно и регулярно путешествую в разные уголки нашей планеты.
И всегда по возможности привожу с собой кофе из той страны, по которой путешествую, - если, конечно, культура кофе там есть как таковая.
А уж если кофе есть и он вкусный - набиваю им чемодан просто под завязку, каждый раз опасаясь перевеса багажа.
Но, оказывается, всего этого можно было не делать, знай я ран…
Хотите знать, как выглядит высшая степень парфюмерного садо-мазо?
Получил духи из дубайского бутика редкой ультра-ниши (здесь и ниже по ленте можно почитать всю драму в трёх актах с прологом и эпилогом) , пройдя долгие переговоры с ними по схеме «ты задаёшь первый вопрос - в ответ тишина. Задаёшь второй- снова тишина. Задаёшь третий - они отвечают на первый. Задаёшь четвёртый вопрос, пытаясь обобщить и подтолкнуть к…
Итак, друзья.
Орёл в гнезде Мыло на базе.
Все 6 видов.
Завтра у меня должен был быть выходной, но буду на работе с 11 до 18.30.
Приходите все, кто планировал и записывался.
❤60❤🔥9👍6🍾5
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pavelyuzaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ANGERMOLAEVA @angermolaeva · 78,602 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин @sciscent · 35,574 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Та самая хранительница @kosmetan_fr · 26,167 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Мать флаконов @smelldate · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Павел Юзаев. Духú и дороги.” (@pavelyuzaev), 3,091 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelyuzaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.