Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отвлекись, надушись!

Channel

Отвлекись, надушись!

@katyaperfume

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,959subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739107577
TypeChannel
Username@katyaperfume
Created8 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/katyaperfume

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,8939,0828,987.56 August 2026 — 8,893 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,899 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,956 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,972 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,970 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,992 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,082 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,027 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,990 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,975 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,968 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,963 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,959 subscribers8,9596 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,865–9,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 14:188,959-4
12 Sept 2026, 07:378,963-5
8 Sept 2026, 12:408,968-7
3 Sept 2026, 00:178,975-15
31 Aug 2026, 03:058,990-10
27 Aug 2026, 18:539,000-27
25 Aug 2026, 04:089,027-55
21 Aug 2026, 14:159,082+90
18 Aug 2026, 20:548,992+22
16 Aug 2026, 01:528,970-2
12 Aug 2026, 14:068,972+16
9 Aug 2026, 23:328,956+57
7 Aug 2026, 01:368,899+6
6 Aug 2026, 21:188,893first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 8,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held59 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total14,686
Reactions total741
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,466 reactions across 57 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,80852.2%
🔥48013.8%
😁46713.5%
👍1674.82%
❤‍🔥1343.87%
🥰1083.12%
962.77%
👀481.38%
🙈481.38%
💘320.923%
🤣150.433%
💯110.317%
😢100.289%
👏80.231%
😍80.231%
😭80.231%
🌚60.173%
🕊30.087%
🤗30.087%
😨20.058%
3 further kinds40.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC526 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Очень мне нравится фото, которым New Notes анонсировали запуск духов в формате 15 мл..

😁34🔥9🕊31

27 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,010 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Обожаю фрагрантику, регулярно выходят "разгромные" статьи на главной про то, как кому-то из редакторов не понравился какой-то запуск, и им критически важно это объявить провалом тысячелетия; Зато вот абсолютно проходной Vendetta Donna Valentino висит в статье про лучшую гурманику. Вы знаете, я ничего против люкса не имею и регулярно его ношу, но это правда скучнейшая тубероза с сандалом, с очень дешёвой базой. На вк

😁4119👍8❤‍🔥1🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,060 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну теперь про сами духи, ноты здесь. Sea Salt & Bergamot Jo Malone - очень тихий свежий соленый бергамот, хотя для меня это больше абстрактный цитрусовый аккорд с упором на корки, со спокойной древесной базой. В какой-то момент помимо корок появилась и мякоть, и мне это больше запахло лаймом. Если честно, очень сложно описать по блоттеру, аромат очень стандартный, но возможно появится что-то на коже. Мне его пока

18🔥73❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,060 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А вот ещё видео и картинки. Вообще роликов там много самых разных, все они про британское побережье. Очень классно :)

31🔥10

27 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,150 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Давайте начнем этот день красиво! У Jo Malone вовсю идёт кампания в честь их новинки Sea Salt & Bergamot. Там много чего прикольного, но от этого ролика я чуть не пустила слезу - такой он добрый и безработный, а ещё немного с настроением Уэса Андерсона :)

39🔥8

26 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,210 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня было настроение политься самым успешным запуском в люксе за последнее время (это я просто сужу по постоянно пустым тестерам в любом магазине) Armani Power Of You. Мне пока хватает пробника, но знаю, что очень много суровых парфманьяков купили себе эту маракуйю :)) Правда очень классная штука, сочнейшая маракуйя с ванильной тарталеткой (в базе похоже на Akro Bake). Когда в первый раз про него писала, на полке

🔥3423😍5❤‍🔥4🙈1

26 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,350 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Northern Love Frederic Malle - это действительно реинкарнация аромата Dries Van Noten (консультант подтвердил), про него я уже когда-то писала тут, но сейчас обновила впечатления. Аромат смолисто-пряный, древесный, очень пачулиевый и есть тут какая-то сливочность в раскрытии. Вот он очень бальзамный, но сливочный при этом, в этом его странность. По нотам много всякой гурманики, но он совсем не съедобный)

44👍10🔥4

25 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,340 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Не совсем парфюмерное, но близко - Заказывала сегодня боул, дядька досконально согласовал его состав, включая количество банальных огурцов, а потом взял и молча бахнул нормальную такую горсть кинзы сверху За что.. Вспоминается мое любимое. Кто вообще любит кинзу?

😁4822🥰8🤝2

25 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,560 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, до нас доехали новые коктейли Kilian (ноты здесь). Пробовала бегло, поэтому это очень предварительные впечатления, буду изучать подробнее. Если коротко - все три понравились, флаконы классные, цена относительно гуманная) ▫️Piña Paraíso Очень симпатичный сочный ананас, не приторный, с ненавязчивым тропическим фоном. Ваниль и тонка дают ощущение булочек для меня. Его попробовала на руке и как будто в базе он

🔥5832

25 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,450 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

У Zarkoperfume ещё одна новинка - Petit Bonbon 🟡Верхние ноты: апельсин, жжёный сахар 🟡Ноты сердца: жасмин, цветочный аккорд 🟡Базовые ноты: амброксан, кашмеран, кашемир, кедр

28🥰17👍5

25 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,380 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вот это идиотское чувство, когда стоишь перед комодами, усыпанными флаконами и пробниками, а чем надушиться - не знаешь. Было такое?) Сегодня решила вспомнить любимый L’Ombre Dans L’Eau Diptyque, я адепт версии EDP. Обожаю этот розовый сад после дождя с бокалом крепкого красного вина! А вы сегодня в чём?)

51👍17💯6😎1

24 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈1,590 views87 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Меня уже заранее прибило мощью, выходят аж два новых экстракта BTSO, оба авторства Фернандеса.. Saint Petal: 🟢Верхние ноты: апельсиновый цвет, бергамот, кумин, пыль 🟢Ноты сердца: фиалка, жасмин, ладан, кофе, акигалавуд 🟢Базовые ноты: амирис, лабданум, ветивер, кожа, уд Melon Malo: 🟢Верхние ноты: дыня, засахаренный имбирь, мандарин, корица 🟢Ноты сердца: болгарская роза, лепестки розы, красные ягоды, пачули 🟢Ба

🔥38🙈2915💯5

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @katyaperfume. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@katyaperfume edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTCAnonymous Poll593 voters

Пользуясь случаем:

  1. Я больше люблю котов40%
  2. Я больше люблю собак24%
  3. Я люблю всех36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Та самая хранительница
@kosmetan_fr · 26,167
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Что-то на томфордовском
@tf_love · 21,796
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин
@sciscent · 35,574
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Я вас не слышу!
@vasneslyshno · 50,332
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Мать флаконов
@smelldate · 31,483
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Randewoo.ru
@randewoo_official · 67,192
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA
@angermolaeva · 78,602
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы
@beauty_goldman · 22,025
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отвлекись, надушись!” (@katyaperfume), 8,959 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katyaperfume.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.