Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,325–2,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:19
2,328
-1
15 Sept 2026, 10:39
2,329
-1
12 Sept 2026, 00:38
2,330
+1
7 Sept 2026, 19:00
2,329
-5
30 Aug 2026, 20:45
2,334
-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:45
2,337
-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:22
2,342
-5
21 Aug 2026, 14:58
2,347
+1
18 Aug 2026, 04:03
2,346
-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:17
2,347
+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:01
2,346
+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:44
2,344
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:48
2,343
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:23
2,343
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
335 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
213
63.6%
🔥
57
17.0%
👍
24
7.16%
🤩
20
5.97%
🤣
11
3.28%
💔
7
2.09%
👏
2
0.597%
😍
1
0.299%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pakhuchiy_sluchay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почти месяц ношу очень симпатичную туберозу от Mémoires D'amour.
Ciel de Paris стартует персиками в сиропе и свежим киви в прохладной фиалковой пудре.
Постепенно на первый план выходит пышная, сливочная, мягкая тубероза.
Она слегка карамельная, с кокосово-ванильным подтоном. От этого аромат слышится тягучим и сладким.
На фоне считывается легкий дымок ладана, щепотка пряностей, ветивер.
Композиция плотная, в меру с…
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Биполярка последних дней.
Влажный, инжирный, зеленый
Legend №11.01 Vittorio
Строгий, белоцветочный, шипровый
Chance Chanel
Задорный и солнечный
Molecule 01 + Mandarin Escentric Molecules
Дорогущий и очень красивый
Symphony Louis Vuitton
Ветиверово-пудровый и бархатцево-горький
Bal d'Afrique Byredo
Воздушный, древесный
Cedrus Chloé
Сухофруктово-кожаный
Ombré Leather Tom Ford
А вы сейчас что носите?
Вещи в дорогу я собираю за 2-3 часа до отъезда.
Чемоданы после возвращения разбираются недели две.
Вот вытряхнула духи, что возила в отпуск.
Опустевший больше чем наполовину тревел Magnolia Alba Chloé был вне конкуренции. Чистые, немного порошковые белые цветы. В них нет ничего удивительного, но ощущение прохладного ветра сквозь чистую хлопковую ткань бесподобно.
Добила L’Eau Serge Lutens, о нем когда-то писала.
…
Я приехала из отпуска и ко мне приехал кока-кольный Paris*L.A. What We Do Is Secret.
Первый флакон бренда на полке и первый аромат, с которым знакомлюсь.
На старте правда кола с лаймом, а вот дальше что-то кисло-сладкое, пока не могу идентифицировать.
Вы знаете бренд?
Я сейчас в Ереване.
Прилетели сюда, чтобы застать праздник Вардавар.
Мы даже готовились, купили водные пистолеты, но что самым ходовым оружием будет ведро, вообще не ожидала.
Поливают из машин, с балконов, даже из магазинов.
На центральной площади под Алекса Гаудино врубили воду из автоцистерн и брандспойтов.
Сегодняшние +38 пережили отлично, 3 комплекта одежды сушим теперь.
Нашла красивое для любителей Chloé Cedrus и всякого свеже-древесного.
Désobéissant Givenchy пахнет крепким чаем со сладковатым цитрусом и влажным инжиром на круглом деревянном столе.
Свежо, плотно, со шлейфом.
Из минусов – штука за много денег.
Что из этой линейки Givenchy ещё стоит затестить?
H24 Hermès в подарочном наборе.
Звонкий, зелёный, воздушный шалфеей с цитрусами и надломленным стеблем нарцисса.
Идеальный офисный вариант.
Заявлен мужским, но я легко представляю его на девушке в широких штанах и джинсовке.
Что от Hermès носите?
Подвожу итоги розыгрыша.
Классная маска от Alexskin совсем скоро уедет к @Sergeeva_V.
❤19🔥7👏2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pakhuchiy_sluchay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Что-то на томфордовском @tf_love · 21,796 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
Я вас не слышу! @vasneslyshno · 50,332 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Духи наизнанку | Кирилл Хайкин @sciscent · 35,574 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Мать флаконов @smelldate · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Та самая хранительница @kosmetan_fr · 26,167 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Randewoo.ru @randewoo_official · 66,918 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA @angermolaeva · 78,602 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пахучий случай” (@pakhuchiy_sluchay), 2,328 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pakhuchiy_sluchay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.