Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,312–8,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 07:20
8,332
-9
12 Sept 2026, 20:18
8,341
-7
9 Sept 2026, 01:01
8,348
-19
3 Sept 2026, 21:15
8,367
-6
31 Aug 2026, 20:46
8,373
-13
29 Aug 2026, 06:52
8,386
-5
26 Aug 2026, 08:25
8,391
-19
22 Aug 2026, 22:08
8,410
-12
19 Aug 2026, 08:56
8,422
-11
16 Aug 2026, 16:47
8,433
-10
13 Aug 2026, 01:54
8,443
-8
10 Aug 2026, 03:01
8,451
-12
7 Aug 2026, 00:28
8,463
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:02
8,464
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:37
8,464
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 8,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
26 (30 July 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
8,640
Reactions total
304
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,423 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
924
64.9%
🔥
278
19.5%
😁
96
6.75%
👍
52
3.65%
🤩
26
1.83%
🤔
19
1.34%
🤯
10
0.703%
👎
8
0.562%
🥰
8
0.562%
🤬
2
0.141%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
7.69%
2 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,540
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,600
over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwsArWf
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
F7NfYUJRWmqqH7eNuaVh
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Тем временем у Lime прайм-эра 🍸
У меня мало вещей бренда, в целом не являюсь их фанаткой, но бывают очень красивые коллекции. Последняя, кстати, оскандалилась – пользователей в интернете возмутил копипаст осени Шанель. Ну и ну, массмаркет выпустил более доступную интерпретацию люксовой коллекции, никогда такого не было, и вот опять!
Первые 4 позиции заказала себе. Я за осознанный шопинг, но надеюсь, что не всё подо…
Viva La Vika в текущем виде ВСЁ!
Можно по-разному относиться к Виктории Молдавской и её стилю ведения бизнеса и соцсетей, но глобально это ещё один бизнес, который не пережил текущее ужасное время. Падает покупательская способность, меняется поведение покупателя и мидл-сегмент страдает от этого первым. Жаль и страшно, что дальше.
Дополнительно подсвечу своё отношение к разговорам, что бренд перепродаёт Алик с нацен…
Что если я вам скажу, что одна из лучших масок от отёков стоит до 500 рублей?
И это за 100 мл и с доп бонусом в виде более свежего отдохнувшего вида лица. ARAVIA Laboratories Urban detox это лимфодреннажная маска с кофеином и водорослями.
Она довольно явно охлаждает кожу, стимулируя кровообращение и подтягивая.
Красные водоросли стимулируют клеточный метаболизм, тонизируют, выравнивают тон и придают сияние.
Кофеин у…
Уровень самоиронии Цветного на этой гаражной распродаже 😂
Клетчатые сумки вместо корзин, зона с базарными манекенами. При этом на этот раз был кулер с водой и просторные комфортные примерочные помимо коморок без замков и и зеркал.
На фото 2 платье прекрасного качества и посадки, которое я не купила по причине торчащего живота. Вот знаю, что у меня всю жизнь и в любом весе такая физиология и это нормально, но практи…
#без_паники_лук на гаражную распродажу Цветного
Футболка OSTIN
Юбка Selfmade
Балетки Zara
Сумка Coach винтаж
Очки Fakoshima
Устала страшно, но ушла не с пустыми руками.
Ретроспектива дня вчерашнего 🥹
На роскошном отметили вчера годовщину в любимом ресторане Гвидон. Потрясающие морепродукты и десерт с морошкой и желе из шампанского, ненавязчивый, но сердечный сервис и интерьер, от которого захватывает дух.
#без_паники_лук платье питерского бренда без опознавательных знаков, винтажная сумочка и сердца Poison drop lab.
Мои поиски багета мечты вышли на новый уровень – теперь я слежу ещё и за ресейлом Азии 🧐
Про aesly.ru я узнала из блога подруженьки и сошла с ума от такого количества брендовых сумок по приятным ценам. Это вам не в ста сортах подделок и умело скрытых на фото дефектов без возможности вернуть деньги сами знаете где копаться.
Все сумки проверены на оригинальность и сняты со всех сторон. Мой список избранного пухнет, и…
Совет брендам – найдите хорошенького блогера в самом начале ведения канала, начните с ним работать, и он будет любить вас вечно.
Так произошло у меня с OSTIN. Мы посотрудничали раза три, но с тех пор я внимательно слежу за новинками и покупаю сама. Пройти мимо LA GRANDE PREMIERE тоже не смогла, и сегодня мне привезли коричневые джинсы, футболку и украшения. Цацки шик, но кольцо большое, думаю размер на 18, я замотал…
Мы любим покупать товары для дома в Фамилии и разумеется за дело, но как вам осенний дроп из цветочного Еврофлор в моём районе?
Честно говоря, захотелось почти всё, особенно форму для запекания с тыквой и баклажан.
Господибоже, КАКУЮ коллекцию дропнули OSTIN!
LA GRANDE PREMIERE посвящена
«Русским сезонам» Дягилева и его творческому союзу со Львом Бакстом.
Вдохновившись балетом начала XX века и силуэтами сценических костюмов, дизайнеры O'STIN воплотили эти мотивы в современных формах и продуманных деталях.
Составы не вау, но всё очень красивое и выглядит вне трендов. Тихо, без хайпа, без бесконечных копий копий люди просто дел…
Вещи нам не сообщают ничего нового, но как же хороша Анастасия с волосами у лица!
❤55🔥23🤔4🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @prada_v_padike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мать флаконов @smelldate · 31,483 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
ANGERMOLAEVA @angermolaeva · 78,602 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
Randewoo.ru @randewoo_official · 67,192 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 August 2026
Ксения Вебер @xeniaweber · 31,019 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Та самая хранительница @kosmetan_fr · 26,167 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Прада в падике” (@prada_v_padike), 8,332 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prada_v_padike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.