Все же видели несколько дней назад новости про Джигана? Если нет, коротко: по данным СМИ, ещё в июле он устроил дома какой-то абсолютный ад – стрелял в сотрудников, дети прятались и писали Оксане, что боятся и думают, что могут умереть. Сама Оксана в тот момент была в отъезде и срочно возвращалась. Джиган, к слову, эту версию событий отрицает. И у меня с самого начала был один вопрос: если всё это произошло в ИЮЛЕ, …

Channel
Онлифанс Кати Конасовой
@konasovatut
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,238subscribers
-982 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001815982033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @konasovatut |
| Description | Не то, что вы подумали 😎 PR и реклама: [email protected] +79932885313 @konasovamedia AEP Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673a2c7523bfbf2cbf48dad2®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 3 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/konasovatut |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 79,238 | -426 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 79,664 | -115 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 79,779 | +165 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 79,614 | +37 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 79,577 | +97 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 79,480 | -69 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 79,549 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 79,571 | -50 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 79,621 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:12 | 79,640 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:48 | 79,670 | -37 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 79,707 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 79,742 | -34 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 79,776 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 79,780 | +60 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 79,720 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 79,741 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 79,750 | -37 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 79,787 | -69 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 79,856 | first reading |
Engagement
109 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.3%
- avg views ÷ 79,238 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,300
- 61 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 61
- of 109 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 109 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 690,060 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,230
- Videos
- ≈906
- Links
- ≈552
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 16m 09s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.83%
- 2 of 109 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 9,700
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 11,700
- over 107 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFG97nXK | 1 | 18 August 2026 | 18 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGunqey | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Увидела, как Ева допивает вторую баночку сока подряд, и поняла, что надо и вам рассказать, какой топ я нашла! Я типичная тревожная мать, ну и мою работу вы знаете, поэтому всегда смотрю на состав того, что покупаю детям. И вот у «Волжского Посада», который мы впервые купили, яблочный сок – просто яблоки, без дополнительного сахара и лишних добавок! Полезла читать про них и залипла: собственные яблоневые сады на бер…
Ловите классный промт для чата GPT: На основе всего, что ты обо мне знаешь, заполни обе стороны этого контейнера разными предметам, которые мне подходят. И прикрепляйте первую картинку! Меня нормально собрал: косметика, камера, микрофоны, витамины и обязательно спф😂 Покажите, что у вас вышло?
Помните, у меня случилась адская аллергия? Я ещё рассказывала про это на Ютубе и показывала, как проходила диагностику в клинике. Тогда мне порекомендовали линию ухода LIŪMI – и вот уже месяц я тестирую средства, поэтому пришла делиться первыми впечатлениями. В общем, это именно система ухода, поэтапный комплекс средств, адаптированный под наш ритм жизни: всё лучшее из корейского 10-ступенчатого ухода уместили всег…
После моего поста выше про то, как сейчас выглядят женщины в 50–60, в комментариях очень многие написали: «Ну конечно, это же Голливуд. Были бы у всех такие деньги – все бы так выглядели». И я решила покопаться. Потому что мне кажется, мы слишком сильно обесцениваем влияние образа жизни))) Да, деньги имеют значение. Хорошая медицина, стоматология, косметология, качественная еда, возможность заниматься спортом – не …
Video message, posted without a caption
Смотришь на эти фотки – и стареть не страшно! Гляньте, как выглядели женщины в 50–60 лет раньше и как выглядят сейчас. И дело же не только в косметологии)) Да, понятно, что косметология, медицина, уход и качество жизни тоже сделали своё дело. Но мне кажется, мы просто перестали соглашаться с тем, что после определённого возраста надо срочно стричь каре, доставать бусы и переходить в категорию «женщина в возрасте»😂 …
Давно мы с вами полезным/классным с Валдбериса не обменивались! Показывайте, что последнего крутого там заказали👇🏼
Осень наступила, а это значит что? Больше никакого адского солнца – и можно официально возвращать все любимые активы в свой уход😍 Я вот с большим удовольствием возвращаюсь к ниацинамиду – моя кожа его очень любит, особенно когда после лета хочется выровнять тон, вернуть сияние и в целом привести лицо в чувство. И вот как раз нашла для себя новое комбо – ниацинамид + растительный усилитель NAD+ в новой гамме Intensi…
Увидела новость, что Meta начала навсегда отключать камеры в умных очках Ray-Ban и Oakley, а у меня они, как раз, есть – причина довольно криповая👇🏼 Во время съёмки на оправе должен гореть белый индикатор, чтобы окружающие понимали, что их снимают. Но люди начали просто заклеивать или выковыривать светодиод и снимать исподтишка. В сети появились ролики с тайной съёмкой женщин, и Meta решила вопрос радикально: тепер…
В Нью-Йорке набирает популярность заведение, которое продает 6 бутербродов за 60$. Люди прям в очереди стоят! Посмеялась, потому что там…обычный бутик, который каждый из нас делает, когда дома ну вообще нечего съесть😂 Но лучшее – комментарий из России: парень сказал, что ребята не доработали и предложил свой вариант – добавила вам последней фоткой)))
Мне постоянно попадаются в Тик Токе видео «макияж после 35», где девушки показывают, как с возрастом поменяли свой макияж. Рассказываю и вам! Там вообще часто идея не в том, чтобы начать краситься как-то по возрасту, а наоборот – пересмотреть привычные вещи: меньше плотного тона и консилера, меньше пудры, больше кремовых текстур, по-другому наносить румяна и контуринг. Я, например, практически перестала красить ре…
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @konasovatut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bananshina · 34,610
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@proektshmel · 123,619
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@kosatka_nika · 30,766
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
@usmanovakaterina · 131,250
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
@marrymemariya13 · 23,894
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
@molotosha · 83,243
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
@komarova_88 · 114,447
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@klassnoe_pp · 30,310
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 7 September 2026
@ya_vdele · 36,971
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
@daryasemm · 158,239
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
@dorogoemj · 21,823
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
@vika_zhinkina · 28,706
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 9 September 2026
@nikysarang · 33,450
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@elmofeo_life · 25,406
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
@mezenovafam · 68,102
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
@olyaredautumn · 107,757
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
@pptonya · 113,552
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@cakepavel · 39,677
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
@elistratovacurly · 29,415
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 8 September 2026
@mikearoundtheworld · 154,601
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@natalinamua · 33,374
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
@terletskayalive · 37,059
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@dr_amina_pirmanova · 130,232
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@istinovaa · 22,045
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 61 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Онлифанс Кати Конасовой” (@konasovatut), 79,238 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konasovatut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.