Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анастасия Истинова

Channel

Анастасия Истинова

@istinovaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,889subscribers

-330 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699039396
TypeChannel
Username@istinovaa
Description№ 4780421149 запись только здесь: https://t.me/istinova_bot
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/istinovaa

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,88922,21922,0547 August 2026 — 22,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,218 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,216 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,211 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,207 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,199 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,198 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,189 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,182 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,185 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,183 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,179 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,171 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,169 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,157 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,143 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,142 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,133 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,128 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,115 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,102 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,095 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,080 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,081 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,078 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,076 subscribers19 September 2026 — 22,070 subscribers25 September 2026 — 22,045 subscribers4 October 2026 — 22,057 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,019 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,008 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,005 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,002 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,996 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,992 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,988 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,980 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,971 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,960 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,952 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,951 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,944 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,942 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,941 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,932 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,925 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,923 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,917 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,916 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,914 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,915 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,911 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,893 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,889 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 91 days, net -330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,840–22,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 06:1721,889-4
5 Nov 2026, 07:5521,893-18
4 Nov 2026, 05:1721,911-4
3 Nov 2026, 03:5821,915+1
2 Nov 2026, 07:0121,914-2
1 Nov 2026, 09:4021,916-1
31 Oct 2026, 08:4521,917-6
30 Oct 2026, 11:3621,923-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:5921,925-7
28 Oct 2026, 16:1721,932-9
27 Oct 2026, 18:4821,941-1
25 Oct 2026, 19:0921,942-2
24 Oct 2026, 16:1621,944-7
23 Oct 2026, 19:0721,951-1
22 Oct 2026, 22:0921,952-8
21 Oct 2026, 21:4621,960-11
20 Oct 2026, 15:4721,971-9
19 Oct 2026, 15:5921,980-8
18 Oct 2026, 17:3421,988-4
17 Oct 2026, 17:1621,992first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.5%
avg views ÷ 21,889 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held56 (10 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total183,670
Reactions total7,256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
944
Videos
588
Links
286

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25m 44s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

32,389 reactions across 55 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤32,389100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,389 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 55 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @istinovaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 19:17 UTC≈5,190 views437 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вопрос, который волнует миллионы!

❤437

6 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC≈8,610 views529 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Надежда Стрелец засняла на видео то, как её малолетний сын поддерживает её и успокаивает истерику после того, как она узнала об уходе Роналду из сборной Португалии. После, она лично выложила видео запись в свой аккаунт. Вопрос один: зачем привлекать ребенка в эти процессы, если можно строить образ заядлой любительницы футбола (на мой взгляд, в воображении Надежда видит это именно так), снимать себя на камеру и брыз…

❤529

4 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC≈9,970 views307 reactionsread 7 November 2026

И, представляете, Серега это по телеку смотрел.

❤307

4 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC≈10,100 views299 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Не только стих! Но и перетрахать всех мужиков в районе 30-ти км.

❤299

29 Oct 2026, 06:04 UTC≈17,600 views547 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Из какой клиники? Валентина изо всех сил, в любом вопросе старается доказать, что в ней есть и качества, помимо красоты. Валентина выбрала сложный путь, в котором каждая глупость, неумелый выбор, подозрительные отношения с мужчинами будут абсолютным доказательством в глазах смотрящих - всего лишь красивая женщина! П.С. Валентине Алексеевой 20 лет. При просмотре видео у меня сложилось впечатление, что она перепутала…

❤547

28 Oct 2026, 05:59 UTC≈14,400 views659 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Дорогие, записываем, заучиваем, практикуем, потом на экзамен. Сразу предупреждаю, за прогул и отсутствие практики - отчисление.

❤659

22 Oct 2026, 05:37 UTC≈20,400 views356 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Где-то в Мексике, к паре одухотворенных людей среднего возраста, изо всех сил не принимающих естественное старение, приехала теща. Если муж уже привык к постоянному прессингу, и готов выдержать давление и справиться со страхом быть кастрированным, то жена, как истинная достигаторша, воспринимает мать как главного врага, которому нужно продемонстрировать- я здесь главная. В сватку вступить боится, но понятно, что пока…

❤356

20 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC≈15,900 views861 reactions3 Starsread 7 November 2026

Дорогие, когда-нибудь вы поймёте, что жалость не помогает наркоману. Жалость - корм для его зависимости.

❤861

20 Oct 2026, 06:02 UTC≈15,600 views716 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Полина Ниоли:

❤716

20 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC≈14,200 views557 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

А вы тоже помните, как толпы людей рвали на себе футболки из-за того, что озлобленный отец отбирал у Арины ребенка? П.С. Арина, как и любой, кто начал трезветь, рассказывает малую часть всей правды. И заметно, что она продолжает винить в своей зависимости всех, кроме себя.

❤557

19 Oct 2026, 09:57 UTC≈14,700 views1,110 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Video

Дорогие, прошу всех приступить к обучению.

❤1,110

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @istinovaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Стихийные мысли st.ixi.ya
@istixiya · 3,844
#1
каши-маши // маша богданова
@mashachut · 29,620
#2
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,626,156
#3
S I D E N K O
@sidenkodar · 2,925
#4
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,619
#5
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,392,195
#6
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,789
#7
ИБ в ТГ
@kinojanyan · 31,840
#8
КК
@petrovtel · 542,485
#9
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 198,226
#10
KOSTI
@kosti · 552,170
#11
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,529
#12
Соня Хромова
@khromovasonya · 74,742
#13
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 333,873
#14
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,691
#15
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,397
#16
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,816
#17
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 77,636
#18
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,117,673
#19
Джонни детка
@Johnny4ekak · 65,425
#20
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,373
#21
персик
@anthonyuly · 232,908
#22
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,185
#23
Вентилятор
@fanforfans · 50,118
#24
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,059,306
#25
Mash
@mash · 3,142,546
#26
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 156,194
#27
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 119,754
#28
Speak with Sarah
@Speakwithsarah · 7,629
#29
Mon Amy
@itsdanilevskaya · 51,700
#30
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,779
#31
Marina Luxious
@marinaluxious · 35,404
#32
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 322,955
#33
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,895,472
#34
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 399,819
#35
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,385
#36
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,955
#37
Катя Конасова
@konasovatut · 76,962
#38
Радости скупые телеграммы
@radosti_skupye_telegammy · 12,866
#39
Wine O’Clock
@time_forwine · 48,106
#40
Двач
@dvachannel · 970,017
#41
СЛАВА КПСС \ АНТИХАЙП
@antihype_kpss · 173,305
#42
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,662
#43
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,094,121
#44
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬
@kanalnekiy · 178,918
#45
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,531
#46
Anton Vlasov
@TrudovoyDrive · 57,745
#47
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,178
#48
небога от бога
@neboga_ot_boga · 98,128
#49
Поднебесный
@underskystar · 23,808
#50
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,779
#51
Телек Телек
@telek_telek · 14,565
#52
всемприветик это хомалон
@ohhomeall · 23,051
#53
ALEXIS
@stepan_alexis · 19,259
#54
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 175,907
#55
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 385,169
#56
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,052
#57
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 905,946
#58
babadzh
@babadzhspeak · 7,480
#59
Юлик
@juliusspeak · 108,742
#60
Эвелинушка
@eveliinushka · 78,410
#61
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 484,510
#62
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,274
#63
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,079
#64
РАМУЗЫКА
@RamusicRu · 75,651
#65
mironovanastasiia
@mironovanastasiia · 145,759
#66
как стать девочкой-волшебницей
@postmodernsoldier · 29,327
#67
саша теслонд @teslond
@teslond1 · 89,353
#68
Мурат наблюдает
@muratiswatchinyou · 2,260
#69
С любовью от Фелиции
@feliciamalets · 22,436
#70
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,400
#71

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вавилонские письмена🦩
@sablezubiiytug · 61,297
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 97,405
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
Василиса Бутусова
@stillvasilisa · 24,568
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Альберт Сафин
@safin4 · 69,155
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Соня Хромова
@khromovasonya · 74,742
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
ALEXIS
@stepan_alexis · 19,259
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
Darky || Дарки
@sheisdarky · 40,069
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Алена Погребняк
@alenapogrebnyaktg · 77,220
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
femFM✨🏰✨
@femFM_by_iliastahov · 25,782
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 September 2026
Kronindoc
@kronin_doc · 21,983
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
Дмитрий Компаниец / Mindset
@dmitrykompaniets · 43,997
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Wine O’Clock
@time_forwine · 48,106
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Бананщина
@bananshina · 34,896
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,789
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
💃🏼 / Корпорация женщин
@gizhevskayae · 26,960
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анастасия Истинова” (@istinovaa), 21,889 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istinovaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.