Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Телек Телек

Channel

Телек Телек

@telek_telek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,565subscribers

-335 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001377899195
TypeChannel
Username@telek_telek
Created19 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/telek_telek

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,56514,90014,732.56 August 2026 — 14,900 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,900 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,899 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,880 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,869 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,862 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,847 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,829 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,804 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,801 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,794 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,787 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,773 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,763 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,752 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,749 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,736 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,723 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,714 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,715 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,703 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,695 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,683 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,679 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,663 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,642 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,634 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,713 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,699 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,689 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,800 subscribers29 September 2026 — 14,710 subscribers5 October 2026 — 14,681 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,658 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,642 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,633 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,634 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,639 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,614 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,624 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,643 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,639 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,640 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,631 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,621 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,614 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,612 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,602 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,605 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,606 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,596 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,590 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,578 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,579 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,576 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,565 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,515–14,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 09:0914,565-11
5 Nov 2026, 07:4914,576-3
4 Nov 2026, 08:1114,579+1
3 Nov 2026, 07:0614,578-12
2 Nov 2026, 07:5914,590-6
1 Nov 2026, 04:2914,596-10
31 Oct 2026, 05:0714,606+1
30 Oct 2026, 04:2014,605+3
29 Oct 2026, 02:4514,602-10
28 Oct 2026, 00:0114,612-2
26 Oct 2026, 23:0014,614-7
25 Oct 2026, 19:5814,621-10
24 Oct 2026, 18:0714,631-9
23 Oct 2026, 19:4714,640+1
22 Oct 2026, 16:2914,639-4
21 Oct 2026, 08:5614,643+19
20 Oct 2026, 03:5814,624+10
19 Oct 2026, 01:5614,614-25
17 Oct 2026, 02:5614,639+5
15 Oct 2026, 23:4014,634first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 14,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held58 (29 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total34,090
Reactions total724
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 16s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,218 reactions across 58 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,98531.9%
❤1,20619.4%
🔥1,05417.0%
🤡78012.5%
👍5949.55%
😱3896.26%
💊2103.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
58
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 58 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telek_telek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.72%
1 of 58 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,040
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,010
over 57 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJ1dzpR129 July 202629 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,190 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Одни и те же визажисты на Парижской неделе моды работали и с Онопочкой, и с Андрэ Так Андрэ показал, как готовится к интервью Собчак. Это было еще во время Парижской недели моды. И к нему пришли визажисты, которые вчера работали со Снежаной Онопко. Судя по тому, что с Онопко была «коллаборация», могу предположить, что макияж ей делали в обмен на отметку или фото. Андрэ также отметил этих визажисток, видимо, тоже не…

😁34❤13👍5

2 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,680 views79 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

После развода с Косенко Саша Белякова в своем прайме. Ее снова любят, она снимает дофаминовые влоги и продает курсы. Сначала по маркетингу, а теперь по эзотерике. https://youtu.be/FLN5CNOLTks https://youtu.be/FLN5CNOLTks https://youtu.be/FLN5CNOLTks

❤48🔥14😁10💊7

2 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,670 views86 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Вот и поговорили @telek_telek

😁62🤡12💊6❤4😱2

2 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,620 views55 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Стилиста Лерчек приговорили к 3,5 годам лишения свободы условно за продажу подделок под видом люкса Суд вынес приговор Эльвире Янковской, известной как стилист Лерчек. Ее признали виновной в продаже подделок известных брендов под видом оригинальных вещей. Наказание - 3,5 года лишения свободы условно. По данным следствия, Эльвира Янковская продавала клиентам подделки Dior, Louis Vuitton и Hermès, выдавая их за ориги…

❤32🔥15💊8

31 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,580 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Заходите на стрим https://www.youtube.com/live/0F0xfRaoFdc

❤20👍3

31 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,550 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Стрим сегодня в 21.00 по мск.

❤34👍6

31 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,410 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я посмотрел первую серию реалити, в которой Михаил Гребенюк купил клинику и собрался делать ее номером один на рынке. Я слышал, что в этом реалити какая-то клоунада, но даже не мог представить, что настолько. В общем, бизнес-коуч Гребенюк в прямом эфире показывает, что ничего не понимает в бизнесе. Смотреть: Бусти | Телеграм | VK

❤38👍10

31 Oct 2026, 14:35 UTC≈2,410 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

У бренда Viva La Vika дела идут не очень хорошо Возможно, вы помните, как в 23 году Митрошина в коллаборации с брендом украшений Viva La Vika выпустила лимитированную коллекцию браслетов с гравировкой «Проявись» (фото 1). Интересно, что в 26 году Виктория Молдавская (основательница Viva La Vika), активно со всеми ругалась в тредс. Но ни первое, ни второе не уберегло бренд от проблем. Так, по до данным из карточки…

❤40👍8🔥8

31 Oct 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,410 views68 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Анкора своими прогревами возвращает нас в 2019 И это не только фразы «вы меня давно просили» и т.д. На днях Анкора провел прямой эфир, в котором первые пару минут думал, что его никто не видит. Поэтому сказал своим помощникам «удалять из чата кого-то». В общем, ничего криминального. Наши любимые блогеры тоже так позорились в 19-20 годах, но быстро научились вести вебинары. @telek_telek

😁48🤡12❤8

28 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTC≈5,330 views70 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Всем привет) Вы помните Малышку Тусю из деревни? Мы ее обсуждали примерно год назад, тогда она уехала в Осетию и стала придерживаться стоицизма. Но время прошло. И теперь Туся вернулась в Москву с новым проектом (хочет улучшить наше здоровье) https://youtu.be/U2Vr9hUSjBk https://youtu.be/U2Vr9hUSjBk https://youtu.be/U2Vr9hUSjBk

❤51🤡16🔥3

28 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,580 views88 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Муж Софии Стужук потерял полмиллиона долларов София Стужук объяснила историю, стоящую за слухами о разводе. Оказалось, что около года назад ее супруг Антон потерял на крипторынке порядка 500 тысяч долларов. В эту сумму входили семейные сбережения и деньги от продажи ее последнего дома. Полную картину София поняла только к февралю, когда семье перестало хватать денег на виллу, школу детей и привычные расходы. Первой…

🤡67😱10😁7❤4

28 Oct 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,660 views59 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Андрэ и Анкора общаются друг с другом через видео на ютубе (буооже, роскошь) Так, сначала Андрэ «случайно» показал сообщение от некоего Grey со словами «ты врун и крыса». Во втором сообщении было: «Одно то, что ты бежишь на интервью к Собчак говорит о том, что ты *нечто неразборчиво*». В ответ Анкора в ролике из турецкого магазина постоял на фоне макарон с названием «Ankara». Вот и поговорили) @telek_telek

😁42🤡13❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @telek_telek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @telek_telek as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бананщина
@bananshina · 34,896
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
НВОРК
@N_4an · 19,087
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Анастасия Истинова
@istinovaa · 21,889
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 119,754
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Siberian Teacher / Сибирский Учитель 👩🏻‍🏫
@siberianteacher_history · 19,137
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телек Телек” (@telek_telek), 14,565 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telek_telek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.