Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for каши-маши // маша богданова

Channel

каши-маши // маша богданова

@mashachut

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,913subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757552015
TypeChannel
Username@mashachut
DescriptionБлогерка, авторка, приколистка 💅🏼 Сотрудничество: [email protected] А+ Включен в перечень персональных страниц: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/675fd712257d5519e4d52ebd
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mashachut

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,91330,16530,0397 August 2026 — 30,073 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,066 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,061 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,041 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,025 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,011 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,067 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,082 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,089 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,096 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,076 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,084 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,097 subscribers23 August 2026 — 30,093 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,054 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,048 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,044 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,041 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,031 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,037 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,008 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,986 subscribers6 September 2026 — 29,988 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,964 subscribers12 September 2026 — 29,974 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,958 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,004 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,165 subscribers26 September 2026 — 30,135 subscribers4 October 2026 — 30,075 subscribers8 October 2026 — 30,009 subscribers13 October 2026 — 29,995 subscribers14 October 2026 — 29,961 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,934 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,919 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,915 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,913 subscribers7 August 202618 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 72 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,875–30,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 20:0729,913-2
17 Oct 2026, 20:3929,915-4
16 Oct 2026, 19:2729,919-15
15 Oct 2026, 17:3729,934-27
14 Oct 2026, 14:3729,961-34
13 Oct 2026, 03:0829,995-14
8 Oct 2026, 20:5830,009-66
4 Oct 2026, 11:3730,075-60
26 Sept 2026, 03:2030,135-30
17 Sept 2026, 12:2130,165+161
15 Sept 2026, 13:3830,004+46
14 Sept 2026, 00:5729,958-16
12 Sept 2026, 08:5829,974+10
10 Sept 2026, 04:5929,964-24
6 Sept 2026, 21:1729,988+2
4 Sept 2026, 05:3629,986-22
2 Sept 2026, 21:1930,008-29
1 Sept 2026, 19:4830,037+6
31 Aug 2026, 22:3830,031+6
31 Aug 2026, 01:0430,025first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.6%
avg views ÷ 29,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,100
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held93 (30 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total521,640
Reactions total49,216
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 01:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,680
Videos
≈265
Links
≈584

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 08s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

121,111 reactions across 93 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤63,62052.5%
❤‍🔥8,3786.92%
😁7,9466.56%
💘7,2595.99%
💋6,0885.03%
🔥3,7543.10%
🤣3,1542.60%
💯2,1691.79%
🥰2,0721.71%
🙏2,0351.68%
💔1,9371.60%
😭1,9051.57%
🤯1,5561.28%
🤬1,5231.26%
🤔1,2361.02%
🕊8970.741%
😢8440.697%
💅6170.509%
🥴5180.428%
🫡4900.405%
30 further kinds3,1132.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121,111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
663
across the posts below
Posts paid on
91
of 93 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
160
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mashachut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.08%
1 of 93 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
11,900
over 92 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5yDT8n614 August 20264 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 08:36 UTC≈7,080 views1,532 reactions9 Starsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Я заметила, что не все посмотрели влог. Ожидайте личную консультацию

💋863😁383💘95❤72🤣70❤‍🔥19🤯13🔥6

15 Oct 2026, 12:52 UTC≈8,100 views956 reactions12 Starsread 19 October 2026
Video

Если вы сомневаетесь, стоит ли вам смотреть это видео, то вот вам небольшой трейлер

❤626❤‍🔥181🔥85💘36😍8💔6🦄4💋3

15 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC≈8,240 views671 reactions18 Starsread 19 October 2026
Photo

А вот и новый влог из одного из лучших путешествий в моей жизни! ❤️‍🔥 https://youtu.be/rIqB9scsjyk?si=KC0UVhggFrrdPu65 В этом видео мы за 45 минут объедем всю Мадейру. Будут горы, ущелья, водопады, океан, леса с жесткими вайбами «Сумерек», облака, туманы, коровы и бесконечное количество паштел-де-ната. Мне кажется, это лучшее, что я когда-либо делала в своей жизни. Я безумно горжусь этим видео 🥹 Так что надеюсь, ч…

❤479❤‍🔥96🦄58💘22💋4🥴4🌚2👍2

14 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC≈8,680 views924 reactions4 Starsread 19 October 2026
Video

Завтра выходит новый влог. Если вы его не посмотрите и не перешлете как минимум 10 друзьям… я вас предупредила.

❤634😁196🍾40💋14🦄12💘11❤‍🔥8🌚4

14 Oct 2026, 09:17 UTC≈9,280 views1,790 reactions13 Starsread 19 October 2026
Video

«Комик» Шейн Гиллис в монологе на SNL пошутил (хотя в чем именно шутка, я так и не поняла), что женщины в спортзале одеваются как шлюхи. Он даже не сказал «одеваются откровенно» или «как женщины легкого поведения» (что все равно было бы неприемлемо). Он использовал максимально грязное, портовое слово «шлюха». Фантастика просто. Шейн Гиллис – это чувак, которого отменили за то, что он на подкасте пародировал китаянк…

❤1,180🤬355❤‍🔥130💯61😭25💘15🥴9💋6

13 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈10,300 views1,835 reactions7 Starsread 19 October 2026

А давайте я буду вам говорить, как я ненавижу работать, и что я создана для кайфа и удовольствия – и вы, мои конфетки – тоже, а вы меня будете любить и везде форсить? Я даже женщин ненавидеть не буду. И шутить про насилие тоже. Как вам такой план?

❤1,240❤‍🔥305💘166💯52💋32💅14🎅8👍7

13 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC≈9,860 views1,698 reactions6 Starsread 19 October 2026
Video

Обратно к новостям нашего городка (хотя лучше б мы и дальше обсуждали мой классный уютный психологический центр). Прохора Шаляпина все еще почему-то продолжают спрашивать о чем-то, а он неизменно зачем-то отвечает. В этот раз мужчина, известный тем, что…ничем в общем-то – наехал на актрис, которые рассказывают о домогательствах спустя много лет: «Радуйтесь, что у вас был секс!» «Я против мемуаров, когда актрисы сп…

🤬1,150❤242❤‍🔥87💯58😭57🥴43😡31🗿11

13 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC≈10,700 views442 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026

Привет! Нам в филиал моего психологического центра «Это Нормально» на Московском проспекте очень нужна хорошая надежная администраторка! От вас – любить людей, вовлекаться и желать помочь, поддерживать чистоту, и стандартные админские штуки: делать записи, коммуникация с клиентами и психологами, составление расписания, заказ расходников и прочее. Опыт работы админом обязателен. Присылайте ваши письма о себе и рез…

❤333💋59❤‍🔥29💘9🦄6🔥3🗿1🤪1

12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC≈12,100 views2,832 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Мы?

❤1,800🤣517💘258🙏86💯74❤‍🔥51😭16💋14

10 Oct 2026, 09:50 UTC≈14,100 views1,322 reactions3 Starsread 19 October 2026
Photo

УМИРАЮ

🙏735😁365❤88🤣73❤‍🔥28🦄13💘11👻4

9 Oct 2026, 10:55 UTC≈15,700 views1,285 reactions1 Starread 19 October 2026
Photo

У меня случился ЖЕСТКИЙ флешбек в прошлое. У вас была такая? Какая одна вещь символизирует ваше детство?

❤927💯156🐳100❤‍🔥42😁28💘14🦄7👍4

8 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC≈15,800 views598 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026

Все просят хот тейк, но я даже не знаю… не орите на меня, если что, пожалуйста Короче, моя мысль была в том, что для женщины как будто более социально приемлемо обсуждать проблемы в отношениях с мамой. Если мужчина после ссоры звонит маме, это «сыночка-бирочка-корзиночка», а если женщина так делает – ну ок, советуется с мамой. С друзьями то же самое: если мужчина обсуждает с пацанам проблемы в браке – что-то с ним н…

❤447💘70🦄39👍13❤‍🔥9🤔7💋5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @mashachut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mashachut edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,205
#1
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 78,178
#2
Я ЗДЕСЬ ЖИВУ
@Anya_zhiza · 4,888
#3
Маруся Черничкина 🫐
@iiaquamarieii · 74,002
#4
Стихийные мысли st.ixi.ya
@istixiya · 3,882
#5
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 97,953
#6
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,307
#7
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,394,688
#8
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,120,535
#9
персик
@anthonyuly · 233,838
#10
Джонни детка
@Johnny4ekak · 65,894
#11
КК
@petrovtel · 546,130
#12
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,639
#13
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,093,581
#14
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 170,926
#15
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 301,519
#16
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 199,840
#17
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 468,867
#18
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 734,277
#19
Горящая изба
@BurningHut · 26,918
#20
АЛИСА О СЕБЕ
@alicekry · 9,417
#21
TERLETSKAYA LIVE
@terletskayalive · 37,012
#22
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 121,146
#23
Alina Muradimova 📷
@alina_muradi · 42,333
#24
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 134,844
#25
С любовью от Фелиции
@feliciamalets · 22,495
#26
РАМУЗЫКА
@RamusicRu · 76,357
#27
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 330,858
#28
аймдевамария
@imdevamaria · 5,133
#29
UsachevRuslan
@usachevruslan · 197,744
#30
Лиза Варвара Аранова
@lizavarvara · 42,766
#31
бёрнинг батт
@burningbutt · 8,579
#32
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 403,507
#33
Федя Фетисов 🐣
@queersdad · 23,546
#34
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 370,742
#35
Дудь
@yurydud · 856,515
#36
яночка 🩰
@dverochca · 2,688
#37
Максим Кац
@maximkatz · 168,448
#38
Феминизм: наглядно
@feminism_visually_official · 31,845
#39
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 365,618
#40
Коса — медиа для женщин
@kosa_media · 21,318
#41
Marina Luxious
@marinaluxious · 35,468
#42
Екатерина Дунцова
@Duntsova · 104,421
#43
Геншин Импакт | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 109,960
#44
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,697
#45
ФемМемы 😈
@femmemy · 9,644
#46
Психологи Watamota
@watamota · 11,894
#47
Радикально - феминистское сестринство 💞 (РФС)
@rad_fems · 8,385
#48
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,062,322
#49
Астапов Павел
@astapov_pavel · 61,774
#50
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 386,993
#51
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 909,347
#52
как стать девочкой-волшебницей
@postmodernsoldier · 29,392
#53
nerds
@nerds · 413,884
#54
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,403
#55
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 99,553
#56
STAN
@stanculturetg · 32,179
#57
girlpower.jpeg
@girrl_pwrr · 18,209
#58
Themiscyra
@themiscyra_wlw · 8,926
#59
первой эякулирует бухгалтерия
@buhcumlter · 36,937
#60
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,686
#61
lе mоt dе lа fin | пoслeдниe cлoвa ⚢
@lmdlf · 9,997
#62
Memjačnica
@memjacnica · 1,386
#63
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,100
#64

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анастасия Истинова
@istinovaa · 21,988
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
Маруся Черничкина 🫐
@iiaquamarieii · 74,002
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
Винтажница
@salixvintage · 28,868
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 September 2026
Соня Хромова
@khromovasonya · 74,975
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 97,953
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
С любовью от Фелиции
@feliciamalets · 22,495
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
Оксана Флаф
@fluff_fashion · 37,048
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Darky || Дарки
@sheisdarky · 39,836
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
кроличья нора 🧚🏻‍♀️
@chiabbata · 28,483
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
Дмитрий Компаниец / Mindset
@dmitrykompaniets · 43,507
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
лиза тут главная
@savchikhina · 48,464
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 September 2026
КОСАТКИНА
@kosatka_nika · 30,556
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Феминизм: наглядно
@feminism_visually_official · 31,845
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
maniloun squad
@manilounpizdit · 46,013
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 October 2026
Змеиные корейскожопки💅🏻💎
@sherillmeee · 27,395
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
Филолог всея Руси
@filologofrus · 42,942
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
rebel woman
@tashatale · 24,561
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
Астапов Павел
@astapov_pavel · 61,774
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Пикули
@antonpikuly · 25,754
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Василиса Бутусова
@stillvasilisa · 24,605
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Правое полушарие Интроверта
@artforintrovert · 55,058
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“каши-маши // маша богданова” (@mashachut), 29,913 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mashachut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.