Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net +784. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,404–21,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:07
21,311
+5
6 Nov 2026, 08:56
21,306
+4
5 Nov 2026, 08:46
21,302
+8
4 Nov 2026, 11:05
21,294
-4
3 Nov 2026, 08:40
21,298
-2
2 Nov 2026, 07:26
21,300
-3
1 Nov 2026, 08:07
21,303
-6
31 Oct 2026, 06:29
21,309
-15
30 Oct 2026, 04:30
21,324
-11
29 Oct 2026, 03:16
21,335
-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:57
21,341
+1
27 Oct 2026, 01:20
21,340
-10
26 Oct 2026, 03:06
21,350
+6
25 Oct 2026, 03:10
21,344
+10
24 Oct 2026, 06:27
21,334
+6
23 Oct 2026, 08:45
21,328
+5
22 Oct 2026, 05:31
21,323
+4
20 Oct 2026, 20:51
21,319
-2
19 Oct 2026, 20:09
21,321
+3
18 Oct 2026, 20:41
21,318
first reading
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.2%
avg views ÷ 21,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
138 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
139,090
Reactions total
2,875
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,440
Videos
≈813
Links
≈5,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 46s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58,868 reactions across 136 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
23,400
39.7%
❤
12,099
20.6%
😢
7,557
12.8%
🤯
6,823
11.6%
❤🔥
2,292
3.89%
😁
2,050
3.48%
👍
2,019
3.43%
🎉
1,362
2.31%
💅
1,114
1.89%
😍
152
0.258%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59,439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 137 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kosa_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (46.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Они летят в Россию за «правильными» женами: кто такие паспорт бро и как их узнать — рассказываем на ютубе
Казалось бы, что такого — отправиться искать жену за границей? Однако у этого мужского движения есть особенная система взглядов. Они считают, что в их родных западных странах женщин «испортил феминизм», и теперь они не уважают мужчин.
Поэтому представители «движения» паспорт бро летят в Россию, Восточную Европу…
Гога — абьюзер или идеал мужчины? Самый полный разбор героя, о котором спорят годами, — в нашем новом видео по ссылке
«Москва слезам не верит» — фильм, финал которого вызывает жаркие споры в интернете много лет. Главная героиня — сильная и успешная женщина Катерина — остается с мужчиной, который хамит, выпивает и при первом же конфликте уходит в запой.
Одни уверены: он настоящий нарцисс, как из книжки. Другие счита…
Мужчины по всему миру массово «улучшают» внешность — и у этого даже появился модный термин. Но отличается ли это от того, что происходило с женщинами веками?
В последнее время многие заговорили о так называемом луксмаксинге. Так назвали явление, получившее распространение во многих странах: мужчины «исправляют» свою внешность самыми разнообразными способами, от кремов и масок для лица до микропереломов костей челюст…
Женщин «заказывали» по каталогу — страшные истории «невест по почте» в новом выпуске на нашем YouTube по ссылке
Представляете, что было бы, если бы мужчины могли выбирать женщин в каталоге? Звучит как очень странная и опасная идея — но такая практика действительно существовала. Зачастую женщина приезжала в чужую страну без денег и не зная языка — и сразу попадала в дом к почти незнакомому мужчине, от которого она те…
Сериал «Девочки» вернется — а пока ждем нового сезона, пересмотрели старые и составили айсберг со всеми самыми странными, скандальными и спорными историями о сериале, его создательницах и актерском составе. Смотрите наше новое видео!
У культового сериала «Девочки» будет продолжение — новые пять серий снимут в 2027 году, и в него вернутся все четыре актрисы, сыгравшие роли подруг. А вот любимого многими Адама Драйвер…
😤 60 миллиардов рублей потратят на блокировки рунета в ближайшие три года. Роскомнадзор усиливается — но и VPN-сервисы становятся мощнее
Расходы государства на систему фильтрации трафика вырастут в два раза, следует из проекта российского бюджета. Деньги получит Главный радиочастотный центр, подведомственный Роскомнадзору.
Траты на блокировки растут, и VPN-сервисы усиливаются в ответ. Paper VPN провел масштабное об…
Единственная женщина в камере смертников — ужасная история Кристы Пайк, о которой спорит весь мир. В новом видео «Косы»
История неудавшейся казни Кристы Пайк вызвала споры по всему миру. Одни считают, что это просто бесчеловечно: 30 лет держать человека в камере смертников, провести дважды неудавшуюся экзекуцию, а потом оставить в силе приговор к смерти. Другие уверены, что ни о какой человечности не может быть и ре…
Девять беременных женщин умерли в одном роддоме за два месяца. Позже оказалось: врачи скрывали, что там происходит. Разбираем страшное уголовное дело — в новом выпуске
В 2021 году, во время эпидемии ковида, в бесланском роддоме умерли девять женщин — почти одновременно. Пока они умирали, родные дежурили под окнами, предлагали помощь, готовы были найти любое дополнительное оборудование или лекарства. Но врачи отвечал…
❓ На холодильник — гарантия. На телевизор — гарантия. VPN тоже может быть с гарантией
Команда ГрюВПН настолько уверена в своем сервисе, что теперь предлагает гарантию: если был сбой — пользователю начислят дни. Больше, чем было потеряно.
Вот что еще обещают в пробной подписке:
🟤 Поддержка 24/7, человек отвечает за 5 минут 27 секунд (среднее за месяц)
🟤 Банки и другие «ру сервисы» открывают без выключения ВПН
🟤 До …
Женщина узнала, что ее сына насиловал член семьи — родственник мужа. И муж, и вся его семья защищали преступника — ее били, объявляли «сумасшедшей» и похищали. Эту историю называют самым страшным роликом недели на YouTube
На канале КОСАТКИНА вышло интервью с женщиной по имени Акмарал, которая годами боролась за то, чтобы наказать мужчину, насиловавшего ее сына. Ролик называется «Коке сделал мне больно». Коке — слово…
🤬385😢73❤64🤯36
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @kosa_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 21 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kosa_media named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@miley named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@miley___123 named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Гласная @glasnaya_media · 20,919 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
Forbes Woman Russia @ForbesWomanRussia · 20,559 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
Такие дела @takiedela · 24,671 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
Феминизм: наглядно @feminism_visually_official · 31,755 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
Нет, это нормально @net_etonorm · 23,159 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
каши-маши // маша богданова @mashachut · 29,610 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
Горящая изба @BurningHut · 26,695 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
DOXA @doxajournal · 33,944 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Феминистское Антивоенное Сопротивление @femagainstwar · 24,744 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
Кедр.медиа @kedr_media · 30,451 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
No Borders for Women: карьера для женщин @noborders_forwomen · 22,050 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Если быть точным @tochno_st · 19,591 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Холод @holodmedia · 57,964 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Лобби @lesbianlobby · 23,151 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Помыла руки @washed_hands · 39,071 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Феминистка инвестирует @feminvestingtelegram · 20,565 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
7х7. Горизонтальная Россия @horizontal_russia · 41,044 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Давайте. Проект помощи украинцам @helpdesk_media · 27,322 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Говорит НеМосква @Govorit_NeMoskva · 54,250 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
ОВД-Инфо @ovdinfo · 120,506 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
ОВД-Инфо LIVE @ovdinfolive · 27,005 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Вёрстка @svobodnieslova · 112,567 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Люди Байкала @Baikal_People · 22,019 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коса — медиа для женщин” (@kosa_media), 21,311 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosa_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.