Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Проклятая амбивалентность

Channel

Проклятая амбивалентность

@damnambivalence

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,075subscribers

+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174460858
TypeChannel
Username@damnambivalence
Created7 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/damnambivalence

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,00212,07512,038.56 August 2026 — 12,004 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,004 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,006 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,011 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,021 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,018 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,015 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,014 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,016 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,015 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,014 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,020 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,019 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,018 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,023 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,021 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,024 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,020 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,034 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,042 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,048 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,054 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,050 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,057 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,064 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,075 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 44 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,991–12,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:4012,075+11
17 Sept 2026, 02:2012,064+7
15 Sept 2026, 03:0112,057+7
13 Sept 2026, 11:5612,050-4
11 Sept 2026, 13:3812,054+6
8 Sept 2026, 19:1912,048+6
5 Sept 2026, 11:3912,042+8
3 Sept 2026, 14:0012,034+14
2 Sept 2026, 06:5312,020-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:0412,024+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:5812,021-2
30 Aug 2026, 06:5612,023+5
28 Aug 2026, 09:0312,018-1
26 Aug 2026, 09:4112,019-1
25 Aug 2026, 11:2412,020+6
24 Aug 2026, 08:3512,014+6
21 Aug 2026, 09:1412,008-7
19 Aug 2026, 10:1212,015-1
18 Aug 2026, 11:0712,016+2
17 Aug 2026, 11:0612,014first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 12,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held23 (17 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total8,140
Reactions total1,315
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10,915 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4,37040.0%
💔3,40831.2%
❤1,74416.0%
🔥6866.28%
custom 57736559797448258785795.30%
👏1281.17%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈1,760 views357 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯320❤30👏7

2 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,980 views505 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Как и многие в эти дни, я следила за процессом над Линдси Клэнси, которой предъявлено обвинение в убийстве трех ее детей. Подробнее можно прочитать в вики, приговор пока не вынесен, но уже сейчас очевидно, что наблюдатели разделились на два лагеря: одни видят женщину, которая сломалась под тяжелейшей нагрузкой и многолетним недосыпом, вторые — манипулятивную властную перфекционистку, помешанную на контроле. Факты од…

💔336💯141❤27👏1

1 Sept 2026, 07:47 UTC≈2,400 views453 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Традиционный мем к 1 сентября #фемпрактикум

🔥264💯104❤64👏21

3 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈6,010 views626 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Внимание, уникальный шанс для всех подписчиц — если у вас никак не хватало времени прочитать мои посты, то теперь оно у вас есть! Я беру перерыв в ведении канала до сентября, а значит, вы можете спокойно, никуда не торопясь, дочитать недочитанное. Вернусь через месяц с новыми запасами интеллектуальной храбрости и феминистской любознательности; никуда не уходите! ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

❤472🔥80💔56👏18

31 Jul 2026, 04:25 UTC≈6,490 views262 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯196❤44custom 577365597974482587822

31 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC≈6,390 views437 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Люси Кук в книге «Секс, эволюция и феминизм в жизни самок животных» приводит несколько примеров того, как вид размножается без участия самцов. Пенангские чешуепалые гекконши, пиявковидные коловратки и еще около ста видов позвоночных (рыбы, амфибии, ящерицы) миллионы лет живут и процветают, не нуждаясь в мужских особях. Но самая интересная история — о термитах. Ученые обнаружили полностью однополые колонии: «Особи и…

custom 5773655979744825878183💯147🔥68❤33💔6

30 Jul 2026, 04:03 UTC≈4,860 views393 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯232💔106custom 577365597974482587847❤7👏1

30 Jul 2026, 04:03 UTC≈4,850 views433 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Несмотря на то, что женщины живут дольше мужчин, они проводят на 25% больше времени в плохом состоянии здоровья, пишут исследовательницы в отчете Closing the Women’s Health Gap: A $1 Trillion Opportunity to Improve Lives and Economies. «Мужская медицина» игнорирует, что женские тела отличаются от мужчин — так же, как игнорирует женские жалобы на боль и неприятные симптомы. Даже элементарное знание о том, что симптом…

💔277💯95custom 577365597974482587837❤22👏2

29 Jul 2026, 04:34 UTC≈3,930 views327 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯201🔥76👏26custom 577365597974482587817❤7

29 Jul 2026, 04:33 UTC≈4,380 views573 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В Гардиан еще одна статья о женщине, которую муж подвергал изнасилованиям, предварительно накачивая препаратами: ‘The bed you thought was safe, isn’t safe’: how Zoe Watts survived drug-facilitated rape — and fought back Чудовищно, что это становится обыденностью и уже появился специальный термин для такого вида нападений: DFSA (Disability Sexual Assault). Чаще всего сотрудники правоохранительных органов и врачи не …

💔313💯185🔥49❤16custom 577365597974482587810

27 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC≈5,880 views530 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мара Даугавиете «Материнство» 1986

💔435❤61💯34

27 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC≈4,340 views590 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Читаю тут, как женщины благодарны своим мужьям за то, что мужья делали примерно 5 процентов того, что обычно делают женщины и страшно грущу от того, какая же у нас всех низкая планка ожиданий от мужчин. Как написала моя подруга — «а кто нам посвятит пост, где будет стоять „я благодарен“ в начале и в конце текста? Да ещё и безмерно? Это все бесконечное предательство» Мужчины не пишут о том, как они благодарны своим …

💯390💔123❤45custom 577365597974482587820👏12

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @damnambivalence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Феминизм: наглядно
@feminism_visually_official · 31,934
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
Коса — медиа для женщин
@kosa_media · 21,147
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
Тамара, какого хрена?
@od_tkh · 22,937
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проклятая амбивалентность” (@damnambivalence), 12,075 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/damnambivalence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.