Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -837. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,044–44,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 03:58
43,170
-47
18 Sept 2026, 20:16
43,217
-51
16 Sept 2026, 14:38
43,268
-12
14 Sept 2026, 15:01
43,280
-44
13 Sept 2026, 01:20
43,324
-47
11 Sept 2026, 00:20
43,371
-36
8 Sept 2026, 01:35
43,407
-89
4 Sept 2026, 23:41
43,496
-20
3 Sept 2026, 09:23
43,516
-52
2 Sept 2026, 01:53
43,568
-25
31 Aug 2026, 22:27
43,593
-22
30 Aug 2026, 20:58
43,615
-24
29 Aug 2026, 22:04
43,639
+1
28 Aug 2026, 21:14
43,638
-27
27 Aug 2026, 20:32
43,665
-16
26 Aug 2026, 17:24
43,681
-35
24 Aug 2026, 17:12
43,716
-28
23 Aug 2026, 04:08
43,744
-23
21 Aug 2026, 18:54
43,767
-11
20 Aug 2026, 13:23
43,778
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 43,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,700
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
89 (27 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
587,970
Reactions total
37,058
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,220
Videos
≈167
Links
≈525
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 42s
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81,570 reactions across 87 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35,636
43.7%
😁
13,551
16.6%
🤣
8,077
9.90%
🔥
7,466
9.15%
❤🔥
4,665
5.72%
🌭
2,296
2.81%
🥰
1,327
1.63%
🦄
1,291
1.58%
💯
1,273
1.56%
⚡
1,080
1.32%
💘
984
1.21%
🍓
572
0.701%
💋
545
0.668%
👍
490
0.601%
🐳
405
0.497%
🤝
320
0.392%
💅
254
0.311%
💔
201
0.246%
😭
168
0.206%
🙏
124
0.152%
33 further kinds
845
1.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребята, привет! Зову вас на концерты! Приходите, пожалуйста
3 октября - Пермь
4 октября - Тюмень
8 октября - Нижний Новгород
10 октября - Петрозаводск
18 октября - Самара
24 октября - Новосибирск
25 октября - Красноярск
6 ноября - Уфа
7 ноября - Казань
8 ноября - Ижевск
13 ноября - Мурманск
15 ноября - МОСКВА
21 ноября - Челябинск
22 ноября - Екатеринбург
25 ноября - Набережные Челны
26 ноября - Чебоксары
11 декабря…
Держите фотку! Скиньте вашу
P.S. 25 сентября на Окко выходит сериал «Искусство падения». Мигель - режиссер. Это настоящее творчество. Посмотрите обязательно.
Я сегодня почему-то встала в 7:30. Написала всем по работе. Мне никто не отвечает.
Так что, Совы! Докладываю вам. Встала первый раз рано. Жаворонков не существует. Они встают за 10 минут до нас и пиздят нам, что уже кучу часов работают.
«Ты в Баленсе? Нет, я в Befree!». Когда мем выходит из-под контроля — получается коллекция Befree Co:Create с Гошей Карцевым.
Гоша — селебрити-стилист, дизайнер и топовый блогер. В этой коллекции он отдал дань уважения своему отцу Виктору Александровичу, а вместе с ним — поколению суровых романтиков, которые сформировали эстетику целой эпохи 70—80-х.
В основе — сложная база, потертые принты и тотальный монохром. Э…
Я так хочу всем угодить, что живу такое будущее, которое нагадала гадалка.
😁496💅91❤77❤🔥63🤣49⚡7🐳6🦄4
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @lizavarvara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
кабачковая икра по акции @sale_caviar · 192,936#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Почти придумала | Динара Курбанова @mamina_dinara · 29,160 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
лиззка @cringeahoy · 34,167 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
Стендап Клуб @Standupclubru · 38,378 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
Сергей Орлов Stand-Up @orlov_skvz · 55,977 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
СКЕТЧУП @sketchup_parfenyuk · 129,256 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Я ВАРЯ @varjauletelaKANAL · 50,940 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Дима Коваль стендапчик @etozhekoval · 141,040 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
Ольга Малащенко @helgametamorphos · 34,845 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
не тереби дао @dukaliti · 122,992 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
MYAGKOVA IRINA @irinamyagkov · 28,797 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
ЖЕНСКИЙ ФОРУМ @zhenforum · 171,503 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Женский стендап @femalestandup_official · 44,051 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Лобби @lesbianlobby · 23,064 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Артур Чапарян @ideiposle · 24,077 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Зоя Яровицына @zoyazooo · 44,619 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
Катя Варнава @VarnavaEkaterina · 25,432 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Рената Литвинова @renatalitvinova · 87,243 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
HUGA Stand Up @HUGA_STANDUP · 29,308 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
DECODERS @d3c0d3rzzz · 21,057 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
каши-маши // маша богданова @mashachut · 30,165 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
Помыла руки @washed_hands · 39,200 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
ZOYA BOOKS | КНИГИ ЗОИ @zoyabooks · 79,306 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Иван Абрамов Stand Up @ivan_abramov_standup · 26,255 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
ЖАБА — медиа-болото @zhabqua · 105,043 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиза Варвара Аранова” (@lizavarvara), 43,170 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lizavarvara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.