Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Надёк

Channel

Надёк

@electronadya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,465subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747253207
TypeChannel
Username@electronadya
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/electronadya

Growth

12,46512,58012,522.56 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,577 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,565 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,561 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,543 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,532 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,518 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,511 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,499 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,495 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,500 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,496 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,495 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,498 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,488 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,489 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,493 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,486 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,481 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,477 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,465 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 28 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,448–12,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 15:4212,465-12
2 Sept 2026, 11:2412,477-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:5812,481-5
31 Aug 2026, 08:5712,486-7
30 Aug 2026, 08:4412,493+4
29 Aug 2026, 11:2512,489+1
28 Aug 2026, 09:4712,488-10
27 Aug 2026, 08:4712,498+3
26 Aug 2026, 08:1612,495-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:1712,496-4
22 Aug 2026, 11:2312,500+5
19 Aug 2026, 23:2412,495-4
18 Aug 2026, 22:1412,499-12
17 Aug 2026, 19:1712,511-7
16 Aug 2026, 14:2512,518-14
14 Aug 2026, 19:4412,532-11
13 Aug 2026, 08:3412,543-14
12 Aug 2026, 11:4312,557-4
11 Aug 2026, 08:1212,561-4
10 Aug 2026, 05:3812,565first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 12,465 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,570
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held16 (2 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total55,650
Reactions total2,875
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,484 reactions across 15 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,92253.3%
❤‍🔥76814.0%
🔥5429.88%
😁4217.68%
🤣1973.59%
🥰1853.37%
🍓921.68%
💘891.62%
👻641.17%
👀320.584%
😍230.419%
💋220.401%
👍190.346%
👌140.255%
😎140.255%
👾110.201%
🦄100.182%
🐳80.146%
🤓80.146%
🤩80.146%
14 further kinds350.638%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 16 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @electronadya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC≈2,380 views396 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Всех с 1 сентября! У кого какой дневник? На физ-ру идёте? Ху из эпсэнт тудэй? 🍸

274🔥52👀27🤣10👍9❤‍🔥8🤓8💘3

15 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC≈6,640 views297 reactions4 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video

Капканы на баранов 😌

190🔥71🥰21💘5❤‍🔥2👻2👾2💅2

15 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈5,530 views304 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video

Когда-то моя старшая сестра купила их первую кассету «Голод», ей было 16, мне 10!!! С тех пор Звери для меня любовь. Даже больше. Они - эпоха, свобода, молодость 🖤

197🔥64🥰23❤‍🔥5💯5💘3💩3🍓1

13 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈5,630 views318 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Самая милая опечатка, котоую я только видела

❤‍🔥156🤣6254😁18🥰15🦄4🔥3🥴3

13 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈5,120 views315 reactions7 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

157😁71🤣48🔥19🥰8🍓5👍4🍾2

12 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC≈5,340 views463 reactions6 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Спокойной ночи! Скиньте, у кого какие животные дома?

333👻40🔥34❤‍🔥18👌12🥰11😍7🐳3

9 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC≈6,200 views233 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @irinamyagkovVideo

ВДНХ концерт был супер просто🙌🏼 спасибо всем, и спасибо за фонарики, мы попросили, что как будто мы Егор Крид😎

154❤‍🔥39😁25🔥7💋3💘3👍1🆒1

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈6,220 views214 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

120😁55🔥19🤣11👀4👻3👍1💋1

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈6,610 views214 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

115😁65🔥17🤣9👻3💋2👀1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈5,980 views121 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Все спрашивают почему я такая нетактичная. Мультики, на которых я росла😍👇🏽

92💘15💋6👻3👾2🙊2👍1

26 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈9,070 views476 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

325🥰66💘33🔥16❤‍🔥12🍓11😍8💋3

26 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈8,360 views275 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @irinamyagkovVideo

Мы в Сочи🤟🏽 скоро увидимся на концерте, приходите там🤍

185🔥42🥰33😁5💋4💘4👍1👻1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @electronadya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ольга Малащенко
@helgametamorphos · 34,506
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
ЖАБА — медиа-болото
@zhabqua · 104,265
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
Лиза Варвара Аранова
@lizavarvara · 43,516
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Мария Маркова | Женский стендап
@masha_markova_standup · 36,795
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Я ВАРЯ
@varjauletelaKANAL · 51,382
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Женский стендап
@femalestandup_official · 44,210
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Зоя Яровицына
@zoyazooo · 44,868
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
СКЕТЧУП
@sketchup_parfenyuk · 128,632
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
ZOYA BOOKS | КНИГИ ЗОИ
@zoyabooks · 79,518
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
ЖЕНСКИЙ ФОРУМ
@zhenforum · 171,866
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Денис Дорохов
@DenisDorokhov1987 · 39,126
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Илья Соболев 🦅 Клан Соболева
@sobolevtelegram · 48,930
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Король Бубей
@beburprime · 53,689
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Надёк” (@electronadya), 12,465 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electronadya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.