Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for maniloun squad

Channel

maniloun squad

@manilounpizdit

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

46,647subscribers

-1,339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001150226670
TypeChannel
Username@manilounpizdit
DescriptionСотрудничество: @christianprmanager [email protected] Заявка на тему видео: t.me/questianonbot?start=235247513 (для обратной связи прописывайте свой ник) Правила канала: https://t.me/manilounpizdit/1658
Created30 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/manilounpizdit

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46,64747,98647,316.56 August 2026 — 47,986 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,940 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,875 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,814 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,734 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,675 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,660 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,580 subscribers17 August 2026 — 47,539 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,500 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,479 subscribers20 August 2026 — 47,448 subscribers22 August 2026 — 47,373 subscribers23 August 2026 — 47,338 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,270 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,241 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,214 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,172 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,101 subscribers31 August 2026 — 47,055 subscribers1 September 2026 — 47,031 subscribers2 September 2026 — 47,021 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,999 subscribers6 September 2026 — 46,960 subscribers9 September 2026 — 46,866 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,797 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,739 subscribers15 September 2026 — 46,689 subscribers17 September 2026 — 46,647 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,446–48,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:5546,647-42
15 Sept 2026, 07:5846,689-50
13 Sept 2026, 18:3746,739-58
11 Sept 2026, 22:2046,797-69
9 Sept 2026, 10:3646,866-94
6 Sept 2026, 04:1746,960-39
3 Sept 2026, 20:5846,999-22
2 Sept 2026, 11:1147,021-10
1 Sept 2026, 08:4447,031-24
31 Aug 2026, 10:1347,055-46
30 Aug 2026, 06:5447,101-27
29 Aug 2026, 03:4347,128-44
28 Aug 2026, 01:5447,172-42
26 Aug 2026, 22:3847,214-27
26 Aug 2026, 01:4747,241-29
25 Aug 2026, 03:2847,270-68
23 Aug 2026, 17:1447,338-35
22 Aug 2026, 03:5847,373-75
20 Aug 2026, 18:3847,448-31
19 Aug 2026, 19:1447,479first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 46,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,280
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held93 (21 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total389,910
Reactions total16,334
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,310
Videos
1,190
Links
351

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 13s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42,632 reactions across 93 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535707181162222306123,55955.3%
🤯8,05518.9%
💯6,33414.9%
😢4,68411.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
48
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 93 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @manilounpizdit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 23:38 UTC≈4,900 views740 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

А норм, что на мою подружку подала в суд мия бойко и за ней теперь следит какой-то чел..? Моя винтаж икона @feliciamalets делала парики для клипа биопомойки и вскользь сказала, что бойко не заплатила за парики В итоге это убежище сначала досудебную претензию и потом уже послала какую-то пешку названивать и следить за Филей Что за 90е? Мы любим, конечно, винтаж, но не эту часть. Конченая эта Мия Бойка, пошла она наху

🤯502💯145custom 535707181162222306176😢17

21 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,480 views238 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5357071811622223061212💯26

20 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC≈6,560 views353 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Извините, вкинула и пропала.. у меня ночью было лютое техно пати Соу… вот что увидели пользователи в интернетах. Хз вот мне тоже попался тт , где сначала нужно было найти что не так с этим фото, но, потратив три минуты своего времени, я ничего не поняла 🥲 только после этой картинки стало понятно где тут ккк увидели Что думаете? Конвера, кстати, извинились

🤯259custom 535707181162222306175😢19

19 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈7,110 views327 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Скандальчик у Converse Если не в курсе еще, угадайте что не так

🤯237custom 535707181162222306190

19 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC≈7,570 views311 reactions3 Starsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5357071811622223061257💯54

18 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC≈7,480 views448 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Дорогой дневник… 🥲

custom 5357071811622223061348💯61🤯39

17 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC≈7,940 views271 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯142custom 535707181162222306191😢25🤯13

17 Sept 2026, 17:19 UTC≈8,000 views399 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

фух, почти аргументировала .. удачи найти ‘ориг’ хахаха

💯282custom 535707181162222306164🤯53

17 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC≈7,920 views642 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

У вас тоже так псинка лежит как рюкзачок?

custom 5357071811622223061508💯104🤯30

17 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈7,900 views199 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО!! https://youtu.be/eyw5hF0jnwM

🤯141custom 535707181162222306158

15 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC≈8,760 views119 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

кошмары про школу 🧟

💯81custom 535707181162222306128🤯10

14 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈10,500 views350 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5357071811622223061255💯58🤯35😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @manilounpizdit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTCAnonymous Poll3,060 voters approx.

??

  1. 170%
  2. 233%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“maniloun squad” (@manilounpizdit), 46,647 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manilounpizdit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.