Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -4,927. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110,792–117,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 17:06
111,531
-97
7 Nov 2026, 11:38
111,628
-70
6 Nov 2026, 11:05
111,698
-61
5 Nov 2026, 10:17
111,759
-83
4 Nov 2026, 06:39
111,842
-84
3 Nov 2026, 03:58
111,926
-80
2 Nov 2026, 06:27
112,006
-50
1 Nov 2026, 06:09
112,056
-52
31 Oct 2026, 03:38
112,108
-68
30 Oct 2026, 00:20
112,176
-65
28 Oct 2026, 22:14
112,241
-79
27 Oct 2026, 18:37
112,320
-113
26 Oct 2026, 16:28
112,433
-29
25 Oct 2026, 19:30
112,462
-51
24 Oct 2026, 21:06
112,513
-68
23 Oct 2026, 23:34
112,581
-64
22 Oct 2026, 23:56
112,645
-94
22 Oct 2026, 00:29
112,739
-82
20 Oct 2026, 17:58
112,821
-48
19 Oct 2026, 18:55
112,869
first reading
Engagement
314 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.42%
avg views ÷ 111,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,810
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 314 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
314 (1 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
419,030
Reactions total
9,869
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈3,290
Links
≈197
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 04m
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 204 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,305 reactions across 311 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18,007
47.0%
👍
6,738
17.6%
😭
4,343
11.3%
🤣
2,330
6.08%
💯
2,087
5.45%
🔥
2,017
5.27%
🤨
875
2.28%
👎
604
1.58%
🤮
552
1.44%
💩
540
1.41%
🥰
212
0.553%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 313 of the 314 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 313 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @komarova_88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 314 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 110 posts held from the last 30 days (12.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Срочный вызов скорой помощи - у мужчины 40 лет сильнейшая боль в животе.
Приезжаем буквально за несколько минут, заходим в квартиру. Пациент согнулся от боли.
А заботливая жена пытается приложить ему к животу горячую грелку и параллельно дать таблетку обезболивающего.
Я грелку у неё сразу забираю, таблетку отменяю.
И мы экстренно, после осмотра, везём мужчину в больницу. В итоге его берут в операционную.
Наш диагн…
Давайте честно🆘
Кому нужно в 2026-2027 году освоить нейросети?
1️⃣Ведёте блог — часть задач можно делать с помощью ИИ 🔥
2️⃣Хотите зарабатывать — почему бы не освоить этот навык?
3️⃣Хотите просто делать красивые фотосессии, оживлять семейные фото или создавать мультфильмы детям — тоже пожалуйста!
Для этого мы и сделали обучение с нуля.
Второй поток уже начался, но присоединиться ещё можно. 9 ноября цены вырастут…
Милый рыжий котик, мальчик, 3 годика , остался без хозяина и ищет себе семью! очень ласковый и контактный.
Кастрирован, обследован и обработан, лоток на 5+
Находится в клинике ВетГлобал, город Москва , метро Бабушкинская, ул Полярная , 10 стр.1
номер телефона:
+7 499 504 43 64
Отметили день рождения сына🥳🥳🥳
Кстати, свои пожелания можете оставить в комментариях, я ему вечером все прочитаю🤩
А как я вышла из положения «Мама заказала торт на другое число» смотрите выше⬆️
Повод к вызову скорой помощи — плохо, задыхается ребёнок, 6 лет.
Место вызова — амбулатория.
Приезжаем на место, нас встречает фельдшер, показывает ребёнка и даёт направление на госпитализацию. В заключении у ребёнка стоит диагноз «коклюш». Диагноз подтверждён лабораторно. Ребёнок болеет уже 2 месяца.
Пролечили несколько курсов антибиотиков, но температура так и поднимается, а у пацана совершенно жуткий кашель, ко…
Сегодня наши ученики уже знакомятся с платформой и начинают обучение ❤️
Очень интересно, какие работы у них получатся!
А для всех, кто хочет немного поэкспериментировать с нейросетями самостоятельно, выше опубликовала промпт для фотосессии 🤩
Кто воспользуется, делитесь результатами🌸
И небольшой организационный момент: 9 ноября стоимость обучения повысится на 999 рублей.
Программа и подробности ⬇️
https://komarova…
Промпты к ним:
Создай крупный портрет, не меняя черты лица. Фотография женщины в стиле «лихие 90-е» в России. Она сидит на старом диване с цветочной обивкой на фоне красного советского ковра на стене. Смотрит в камеру с легкой улыбкой. Безупречный макияж. На ковре висят большие надувные белые фальгированные шары в форме цифр «1988» и надпись «MADE IN». Она одета в классический красный спортивный костюм того времени…
❤8💩3🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @komarova_88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @komarova_88 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ДОКТОР ВАРНАВСКИЙ @doctor_varnavskiy · 24,494 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Записки судмедэксперта @sudmednotes · 166,893 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Твори добро с Серегой и наш мир станет добрее❤️ @SeregaSoul1 · 24,425 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
Доктор Гребешкова @doctor_grebeshkova · 33,903 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Семья mom_amam❤️ @mom_aamam · 33,298 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 September 2026
ВИКТОРИЯ | ТАНАТОПРАКТИК @tanatovik · 18,825 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 October 2026
tata_will_tell @tata_will_tell · 33,958 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 September 2026
Необычные путешествия @mikearoundtheworld · 151,064 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Голова Медузы🪼 @golovameduza · 23,477 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Марина Балмашева @balmasheva_marina · 20,218 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 September 2026
Мамка Бабских Форумов @ks_nyash · 18,968 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 October 2026
Микерина. Роды? Зови акушера! @mikeryna_sashaa · 188,067 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ @dmitry_lukyanchuk · 123,820 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Елена Яловик @elenayalovik62 · 27,638 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Ирина Смирнова @IrinaSmirnova1 · 187,756 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
coroner's word 💀 @sudmed_words · 21,273 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
Скорая помощь @EMHelp_Channel · 25,291 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Истории со скорой” (@komarova_88), 111,531 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komarova_88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
