Fara Homidi Essential Bronzer Compact Бронзирующая крмпактная пудра для лица в оттенке Bois В эту прекрасную субботу решила наконец вам поведать о своих последних бьюти-обсессиях — продуктах для лица бренда Fara Homidi🥹 Присаживайтесь поудобнее! Я обожаю находить почти неизведанные «жемчужинки» в косметическом мире и недавно познакомилась с новой для меня американской маркой Fara Homidi. Это молодой нишевый люксовы…

Channel
Уходом единым
@uhodom_edinym
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,538subscribers
+193 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001264917435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uhodom_edinym |
| Description | Автор Юлия Носевич Сотрудничество @rootsmedia Instagram (запрещен в РФ): https://instagram.com/uhodom_edinym YouTube: https://youtube.com/@uhodom_edinym Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FZ4YR |
| Created | 29 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uhodom_edinym |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:49 | 63,538 | -15 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:38 | 63,553 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 63,563 | -34 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:11 | 63,597 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 63,596 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:39 | 63,600 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 63,631 | +31 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 63,600 | +47 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 63,553 | -10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 63,563 | -20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 63,583 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:06 | 63,587 | +14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 63,573 | +11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 63,562 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 63,569 | +8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 63,561 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:55 | 63,565 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 63,572 | -25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 63,597 | +5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 63,592 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.6%
- avg views ÷ 63,538 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,290
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (15 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 223,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,030
- Videos
- ≈250
- Links
- ≈710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 28s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.33%
- 1 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 10,200
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 10,300
- over 74 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Ranymhbgy9 | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Мой топ средств для умывания прямо сейчас🔥 Clinical Skin Brightening Face Wash — космос с феерическим составом! 2% гликолевая кислота, 1% салициловая кислота, экстракт лакрицы, тетрагексилдецил аскорбат и токоферол. Подойдет тем, кому нужны сияние и эксфолиация. Marini SkinSolutions Bioglycolic Face Cleanser — еще одно кислотное средство для умывания, но в виде кремовой эмульсии. Полирует кожу как пилинг, стирая вс…
Video, posted without a caption
Marini SkinSolutions Transformation Eye Cream Трансформирующий крем для кожи вокруг глаз с интенсивным восстанавливающим и увлажняющим действием Вы еще не сбились со счету, сколько постов я посвятила продуктам Marini SkinSolutions ? Ничего не могу с собой поделать — это реально мой самый любимый уходовый бренд на данный момент🤍 После неудачного опыта с очень уж зубодробительным HydroPeptide Eye Renewal с ретинолом …
Photo, posted without a caption
Что покупать у Victoria Beckham?💰 Собрала для вас все посты о продуктах Виктории — нажимайте на ссылку, переходите, читайте🤍 — увлажняющий сияющий праймер Victoria Beckham by Augustinus Bader The Cell Rejuvenating Illuminator в оттенке Golden; — тональный флюид Victoria Beckham by Augustinus Bader The Foundation Drops with TFC8; — консилер Victoria Beckham by Augustinus Bader The Concealer Pen; — контурные стилу…
Video, posted without a caption
Ладно, давайте сменим пластинку и после обсуждения неудачных покупок — выше — поговорим о покупках удачных🤪 Компания у нас собралась разношерстная! — сбилась со счету, сколько мной было куплено этих антиперспирантов от Vichy за последние пятнадцать лет. Обожаю! Меняю лишь вариации, в этот раз заказала версию от пятен; — крем для рук и для ног Gehwol. Крем для рук Gerlasan повторяю уже то ли во второй, то ли в трети…
Конфуз с бальзамом для губ Prada🙈 Вот думаю — нужен ли тут вообще пост?🤪 #prada
Video, posted without a caption
DSD de Luxe 1.1 Antiseborrheic Shampoo Антисеборейный шампунь Диксидокс Де Люкс Переписывалась с личных сообщениях с подписчицей о бренде DSD de Luxe, и мы вместе пригли к выводу — это бренд, который влюбляет в себя надолго. Даже если ты «сходишь налево» и попробуешь другие марки, зуб даю, ты вернешься к DSD de Luxe опять😄 С этим шампунем у меня произошло именно так! Я обожала его пять лет назад и теперь подсела на …
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @uhodom_edinym. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@uhodom_edinym edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bogdanovich_elena · 115,945
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@irinameyk · 133,246
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@ByCosmetist · 19,197
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 October 2026
@katrin_rul · 35,673
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 September 2026
@facebbos · 20,213
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@hirecomend · 18,858
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 October 2026
@julyabaybeauty · 27,633
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
@koshechkiklub · 26,523
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@bigbeautyboss · 88,760
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@aidaprodom · 317,653
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@piletskayabeauty · 94,581
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@koffkamk · 24,543
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
@jeni_vosk · 19,641
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
@abramovskayada · 28,531
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
@sunxsteel · 25,922
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
@byeva · 26,160
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
@klyukinad · 26,424
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
@vizoviy · 26,894
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
@spivakkatyaa · 28,153
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@anastasiia_kuzhovnik · 25,032
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
@Beauty_AD · 26,014
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уходом единым” (@uhodom_edinym), 63,538 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uhodom_edinym.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.