Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шапизнес 🤹🏼‍♀️

Channel

Шапизнес 🤹🏼‍♀️

@shapizness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,130subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831687943
TypeChannel
Username@shapizness
Created28 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shapizness

Growth

7,1307,1827,1567 August 2026 — 7,139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,132 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,146 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,158 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,179 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,182 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,170 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,143 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,130 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,122–7,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 05:377,130-13
2 Sept 2026, 21:487,143-27
30 Aug 2026, 09:557,170-12
27 Aug 2026, 04:247,182+3
24 Aug 2026, 06:377,179+1
20 Aug 2026, 20:037,178+20
17 Aug 2026, 12:557,158+12
13 Aug 2026, 23:577,146+14
10 Aug 2026, 23:517,132+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:377,130-9
7 Aug 2026, 13:187,139first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

811 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54767.4%
🔥10713.2%
💯779.49%
😍384.69%
❤‍🔥101.23%
🏆101.23%
👌101.23%
👍70.863%
🐳30.37%
💅10.123%
🤣10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 9 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shapizness. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,370 views46 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сижу, разгребаю чаты, в каждом кто-то ждет моего решения по какому-то важному вопросу и думаю, что в последнее время ощущаю себя скалой. Об эту скалу регулярно бьются волны разной степени интенсивности, периодически накрывают цунами, где-то она остается целой, а где-то вода камни-таки подточила, но незначительно. Вспоминаю себя лет 7 назад, тогда такой объем неопределенности, ответственности, необходимости справлять

28😍8💯6❤‍🔥2👍2

28 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈2,180 views121 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

На что не нужно было тратить деньги в Тайни? На днях бизнес-деть отметил 8 месяцев. Смотрю на P&L и хвалю нас за то, что мы очень даже бережливые ребята (✡️), немного было неэффективных инвестиций, но все-таки без них не обошлось. Делюсь, на что мы слили деньги зря — мне кажется, этот опыт кому-то да может быть полезен: 🍄 блогеры с мама-центричным контентом — вы, наверное, удивились, но, да, для нашего продукта пло

82🔥29❤‍🔥8👍1💯1

8 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,400 views126 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Рандомная мысль дня: в 99,9% случаях команда по дефолту воспринимает нового руководителя негативно, еще до того, как он вышел и успел сказать хотя бы слово :) Каждый мой выход руководителем в сформированную команду с первых секунд сопровождался тоннами скепсиса, недоверия, бывало и саботажа. Никто, увы, не бросается в твои объятия, даже если жизнь с предыдущим лидером (или вообще без него) была тяжелой, а ты призван

88💯27👌10💅1

30 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,660 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Точка Банк в очередной раз делает оооочень добротную бизнес-конфу ТОК и попадает в один из главных запросов сегодняшнего дня — дает предпринимателям возможность перенять практический опыт у тех, кто продолжает развивать бизнес, несмотря на любые обстоятельства. В этом году в спикерах снова клевые предприниматели: Иван Шкиря (Callibri, Haunds), Николай Попович из «ВкусВилла» и Beyond Taylor, Дарья Молокова из Simpule

11🔥5👍4🤣1

26 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,330 views74 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Тайни-апдейт! 🎁 В мае-июне я чуть ослабила операционный контроль в Тайни, а хорошие дела там продолжали происходить — ну мед 😊 запустили коллабу-лимиточку с Boft — в каждом боксе теперь дофаминовые фоторамки для фиксации важных моментов детства. и промики на бесплатную печать фотографий! 😊 в экстремистской сети мы медленно, но идем к тому качеству контента, который я хочу видеть. становимся чуууть больше похожи на

51🔥13🏆10

18 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC≈2,670 views159 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Пару месяцев, как я совмещаю управление своим бизнесом, найм и материнство Зовется это нынче портфельной карьерой — когда у тебя есть параллельно несколько «работ» и источников дохода. Видела много текстов, где портфельная карьера романтизируется, но мне это кажется слегка лукавством, и очень хочется добавить субъективной честности в этот разговор — решение диверсифицировать рабочие роли у нашего поколения вызваны т

116💯24🔥19

21 May 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,440 views116 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Фух, зафиксировали рекордно-долгое молчание в этой газетке! Все потому что я решила, видимо, еще чуток проэкспериментировать с вместимостью своей психики и захватила себе еще одну роль. Новость такая: теперь я совмещаю предпринимательство и топ-менеджерство в найме :) Пока не раскрываю деталей куда и кем, но, видимо, здесь теперь будет больше про трендовую нынче портфельную карьеру 🪂 если есть какие-то вопросы и те

75🔥27😍14

29 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,920 views76 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Остановилась возле стеллажа дочки и думаю — это что, мы такой капсульный гардероб игрушек сами создали? 🥹💔 Меня часто спрашивают в предпринимательской тусовке, почему я решила делать физический бизнес, а не tech, если в техе у меня хорошая экспертиза, он более маржинальный и существенно менее геморный? А вот поэтому. Потому что видеть, что твоя дочка из всего миллиарда игрушек по своей воле выбирает те, что произве

48😍16💯10🐳2

21 Apr 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,770 views72 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мои маркетинг-скрины этой недели🧚🏻‍♀️ Все хорошие кейсы всегда скриню и складываю в отдельную папочку. Вот что из увиденного понравилось на этой недельке: 🖤 оффлайн-механика от студии автопортрета uptoyou: голосование стикером на окне — клево и визуально, и по механике, и с точки зрения метча попсового тренда с бизнесовым кол-ту-экшном 🖤 кастомный дизайн лимонадов от Лапочки для инфлюенсеров — если кастом, то вот т

48🔥14💯9🐳1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @shapizness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FounderWoman
@FounderWoman · 44,875
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Ловись рыбка
@heyanie · 32,719
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 152,697
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 37,668
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 58,344
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов
@hutzp · 46,497
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 106,256
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Дашич, беги🚀
@dashich_begi · 37,115
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Mama Nature
@tomnayaa · 43,280
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 54,466
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Есть контакт?
@estcontact · 28,567
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шапизнес 🤹🏼‍♀️” (@shapizness), 7,130 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shapizness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.