Автор канала - Ольга Дементьева @HR_4_PR, руководитель агентства HR4PR, специализирующегося на подборе топ-менеджеров в области PR/маркетинга.
Основатель закрытого сообщества PR- директоров
✅Регистрация в перечне РКН
Created
18 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,813–15,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 19:16
15,934
+52
19 Aug 2026, 15:51
15,882
+3
18 Aug 2026, 15:34
15,879
+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:35
15,878
-11
16 Aug 2026, 08:43
15,889
-7
14 Aug 2026, 20:34
15,896
+5
13 Aug 2026, 09:45
15,891
+27
12 Aug 2026, 07:42
15,864
+14
11 Aug 2026, 06:55
15,850
+18
10 Aug 2026, 07:30
15,832
-11
9 Aug 2026, 10:01
15,843
-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:34
15,844
+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:03
15,843
+14
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
15,829
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:10
15,829
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.90%
avg views ÷ 15,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
780
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
63 (1 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
49,161
Reactions total
1,069
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,330
Videos
≈480
Links
≈2,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 48s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,036 reactions across 55 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
380
36.7%
👍
278
26.8%
🔥
248
23.9%
👏
48
4.63%
👌
24
2.32%
⚡
13
1.25%
🤩
13
1.25%
custom 5372923951796198347
7
0.676%
🆒
6
0.579%
👨💻
5
0.483%
🤣
5
0.483%
✍
4
0.386%
🤝
4
0.386%
😘
1
0.097%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,069reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 63 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hr4pr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему мы говорим «талант», думаем, как его развивать, и одновременно боимся его закопать? #ОднимСловом
Я сейчас в Петербурге, прогулялась по залам потрясающего Училища Штиглица. Прикреплю видео, потому что это действительно стоит увидеть.
И вот здесь я снова подумала о слове «талант».
В древнегреческом оно сначала означало меру веса, а позже стало названием крупной денежной единицы.
А современное значение связано…
🎯 Карьерная дилемма
Вам предлагают повышение.
Зарплата выше, статус выше, но вместе с этим больше ответственности и меньше свободы. Что выберете?
🚀Приму оффер, рост того стоит, потом перестрою процессы под себя и верну себе свободу62%
Соглашусь, если деньги соответствуют новой роли37%
Откажусь! Нервы и личное время дороже красивых должностей10%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Используйте карьерный навигатор под задачу 🎯
Собрала здесь главное, о чём говорили этим летом: про поиск работы, карьерный рост, самопрезентацию, найм, управление и просто интересные истории, из которых иногда можно вынести вполне практичный карьерный урок.
Выберите задачу → переходите сразу в нужный раздел → сохраняйте то, что пригодится позже.
Внутри есть и посты, и исследования, и подкасты, и кейсы.
➡️КАРЬЕРА И…
В рубрике #ВысокаяЛюбознательность мои заметки про идеальную самопрезентацию
и о том, как продавать свой опыт на уровне топ-менеджмента.
Мы часто обсуждаем, как правильно составить резюме.
Обычно кандидаты подробно перечисляют свой опыт: «управлял командой», «внедрил систему», «отвечал за бюджет».
И ждут, что работодатель сам поймёт, как всё это можно применить к его бизнесу.
А теперь представьте кандидата, которы…
Гуманитарий + IT: новая карьерная формула
Раньше мы выбирали одну профессию и копали вглубь. Сейчас конкурентное преимущество возникает на пересечении экспертиз.
➡️Слышали о «цифровых гуманитариях»? Написала подробнее здесь для BFM колонку,
думала о том, что нам всем не обязательно срочно осваивать новую профессию. Достаточно провести аудит того, что мы уже умеем.
Задайте себе пару вопросов:
🔹Какие технологии и ИИ…
Гарантия долгосрочной занятости становится новым карьерным бонусом
Что сегодня действительно важно сотрудникам при выборе работодателя?
Исследование «Талантист» показывает интересную картину: среди ключевых факторов для россиян не только хорошая зарплата и финансовая стабильность, но и гарантия долгосрочной занятости, приятная атмосфера, баланс работы и личной жизни. В исследовании участвовали более 21 тысячи челов…
Фрилансерам стали платить больше.
Но рынок меняется не только в деньгах
Средняя выплата одному фрилансеру за год выросла примерно на 19%.
К такому выводу пришли аналитики Solar Staff, сравнив период с июня 2025 по июнь 2026 года.
Полные результаты исследования есть в нашем распоряжении.
При этом совокупные выплаты выросли только на 7%.
То есть бизнес не просто увеличивает объём работы с фрилансерами. Он готов боль…
📚 Что почитать: «Пиар в НЕреальном времени»
Десять лет назад мы учились работать в «реальном времени». С тех пор поменялось, кажется, всё: объём информации вырос в 100 раз, аудитория распалась на пузыри, а на смену диджитализации пришла нейрофикация.
Михаил Умаров выпустил новую книгу о том, как управлять доверием в мире, где факты часто значат меньше, чем их интерпретация.
Почему это маст-рид для пиарщика?
Книга …
Нанимают за экспертизу, а запоминают личность
Что общего у самых интересных людей, которых вы встречали?
Скорее всего, вы сейчас вспомнили не их должность.
Не подумали: «Он был прекрасным финансистом» или «Она отличный маркетолог».
Вы вспомнили что-то другое: как человек говорил, чем увлекался, что его отличало, о чём с ним было интересно разговаривать.
И вот здесь есть важная мысль для карьерного продвижения:
на…
⚡️Пока одни компании запрещают сотрудникам разглашать зарплаты, а другие боятся указывать их даже в вакансиях,
Buffer пошла в противоположную сторону: опубликовала в открытом доступе зарплаты всех своих сотрудников. Включая CEO
Buffer, это американская SaaS компания, которая развивает сервис для управления соцсетями: публикации контента, аналитики и работы с несколькими платформами из одного места.
Компания известн…
👍4❤3🔥2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @hr4pr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎯 Карьерная дилемма
Вам предлагают повышение.
Зарплата выше, статус выше, но вместе с этим больше ответственности и меньше свободы. Что выберете?
🚀Приму оффер, рост того стоит, потом перестрою процессы под себя и верну себе свободу62%
Соглашусь, если деньги соответствуют новой роли37%
Откажусь! Нервы и личное время дороже красивых должностей10%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Получить новое назначение, расширить масштаб влияния38%
Создать/запустить что- то новое19%
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А как вы обычно ищете сотрудников? Что хорошо работает, какой метод👇
Публикую вакансии на хх и жду откликов39%
Размещаю вакансии в своих соцсетях и тг- каналах18%
Использую прямой поиск, сам(а) звоню подходящим кандидатам22%
В основном все классные кандидаты приходят по рекомендациям коллег43%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
После вчерашнего разговора про мышление, стратегии и фреймворки мне захотелось задать вам один вопрос.
Когда перед вами оказывается новая, сложная задача, что вы делаете в первую очередь?
Ищу методику или чек- лист33%
Действую интуитивно, а уже потом разбираюсь, что сработало17%
Ищу человека, который уже решал похожую задачу28%
Начинаю действовать и корректирую по ходу курс47%
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 37,000 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лучшие вакансии @vacanciesbest · 160,775 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Беспощадный пиарщик @prbezposhady · 151,968 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Москва промышленная @prommoscow · 79,680 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
Лобушкин @lobushkin · 100,045 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Больше джобсов @morejobs · 82,316 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
Журналистика @dddjournalism · 130,110 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Russian Business @rb_ru · 370,588 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
БП онлайн @bponline · 100,281 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
⚡️Лобушкин молнит @lobushkinflash · 61,347 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HR4PR” (@hr4pr), 15,934 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr4pr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.