Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 48 days, net +5,584. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,035–23,754 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:54
22,863
+734
18 Sept 2026, 16:59
22,129
+685
16 Sept 2026, 06:56
21,444
+512
14 Sept 2026, 11:20
20,932
+16
12 Sept 2026, 22:58
20,916
-19
11 Sept 2026, 01:18
20,935
-1
8 Sept 2026, 00:41
20,936
+3,363
4 Sept 2026, 21:21
17,573
+616
3 Sept 2026, 09:25
16,957
+11
2 Sept 2026, 05:33
16,946
+20
1 Sept 2026, 07:14
16,926
-243
31 Aug 2026, 06:56
17,169
-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:46
17,170
-5
29 Aug 2026, 03:36
17,175
-12
26 Aug 2026, 23:36
17,187
-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:13
17,190
-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:48
17,192
-7
23 Aug 2026, 10:17
17,199
-13
21 Aug 2026, 21:36
17,212
-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:22
17,216
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 22,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,520
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
25 (14 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
190,429
Reactions total
4,329
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 02:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,120
Videos
≈485
Links
≈339
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,629 reactions across 25 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
933
16.6%
🔥
834
14.8%
😁
752
13.4%
👏
727
12.9%
🤔
664
11.8%
👍
650
11.5%
🥰
424
7.53%
👎
329
5.84%
🤩
240
4.26%
😍
28
0.497%
💯
13
0.231%
😘
7
0.124%
🎉
6
0.107%
❤🔥
5
0.089%
🤡
5
0.089%
😱
4
0.071%
🌚
2
0.036%
👀
2
0.036%
custom 5778204603514359229
1
0.018%
🍾
1
0.018%
2 further kinds
2
0.036%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,629 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
166
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 25 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forumchanka_on_air. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вчера под осенним дождём Форумчанка добралась до особняка Roden на встречу Исторического дискуссионного клуба Ольги Касьян. Тема завораживала уже названием — «Азбука Севера: искусство становиться своим» ❤️
Ольга устроила отличный ликбез про предпринимателей дореволюционной России и, чтобы мы точно не потерялись где-то между XIX веком и современным бизнесом, провела очень понятные параллели.
Например, Нижегородская …
Да-да, Форумчанка сразу после съёмок заглянула на Неглинную в restore: — и вышла оттуда уже в новеньких Apple Watch в титановом корпусе 😌⌚️
Как и обещали — 22 сентября получила. Без очередей, мам, пап и кредитов 😂 Всё чётко: пришла, примерила, забрала.
И помимо новых функций, они просто очень красивые 😍 Титан, аккуратный корпус — в общем, биохакинг тоже может быть стильным. Так что теперь будем красиво следить за с…
Перед ВЭФ партнёры пригласили Форумчанку на капустный ужин в честь фестиваля «Крошево» 🥬 Тогда мы честно попробовали серые щи, прониклись русским гастрономическим кодом и ещё не подозревали, что это только начало наших серьёзных отношений с капустой 😂
Продолжение следует: 26 сентября Форумчанка собирается в Боровичи, которые на один день превратятся в настоящую капустную столицу России ❤️🥬
И едем мы туда не просто …
Суббота у Форумчанки прошла под знаком надкусанного яблока 🍎 В restore: показывали новинки Apple, и, кажется, кто-то в Купертино наконец добрался до брендбука Форумчанки 😁
Новый iPhone — в роскошном бургунди 🍷❤️ Ну всё, другие цвета можно было даже не распаковывать 🥰
Всё-таки истина в вине. А если винный оттенок ещё и совпадает с корпоративными цветами — считайте, выбор одобрил отдел маркетинга 😂
Весёлый оранжевый…
Сбер — настоящий мастодонт ВЭФ 😌
В этом году свой стандартный офис Сбер превратил в полноценный многофункциональный стенд 😍. Работать здесь по-прежнему можно, но теперь велик риск зайти по банковскому вопросу и выйти через час с новой картой, коллекционной монетой и результатами обследования 😌
Начнём с красивого 😍. Каждый участник ВЭФ может оформить здесь лимитированную карту с видами Владивостока 🌉 Или поменять св…
На стенд Корпорации развития Дальнего Востока и Арктики неожиданно ожидаемо заглянул Михаил Захарович Шуфутинский😄🤩🔥Переворачиваем календарь и ждём пленарку ☺️ #стендпарад
Доброе утро, любимые ❤️
Пока Форумчанка носится по полям ВЭФ, наш журнал делает примерно то же самое — разлетается по площадкам, стендам, отелям и рукам форумчан 📖✨
А внутри, между прочим, большие разговоры с большими героями Дальнего Востока. В том числе интервью с губернатором Хабаровского края Дмитрием Демешиным — о развитии региона, новых проектах и о том, куда сегодня вообще движется Дальний Восток🔥
Но отдель…
Сегодняшний вечер Форумчанка завершает на концерте «Душа России. Язык, который понимают все» при поддержке А7 и ПСБ ❤️🎶
Площадь Борцов Революции гуляла вместе с Филиппом Киркоровым, Николаем Басковым, Гариком Сукачёвым, Клавой Кокой, Люсей Чеботиной и другими артистами. И особенно приятно, что большой праздник сделали не только для участников ВЭФ, но радушно открыли двери для всего Владивостока ✨
А поскольку Форумч…
В командировки ездит не только Форумчанка, иногда в них отправляются даже шедевры изобразительного искусства 😌🖼️✈️
Картина Александра Дейнеки «У моря» в девятый раз покинула Русский музей — и приехала сразу на ВЭФ во Владивосток 🌊
Шедевр представили в совместном пространстве ПСБ и А7 «Душа России»❤️
Среди редких предыдущих поездок — биеннале в Сан-Паулу в 1963 году и выставка в Риме в 2011-м. Теперь в географии по…
Завтра к пленарке ожидается наплыв участников, которые прилетят дневными и вечерними рейсами «Аэрофлота» 😌
Кстати, РСХБ заботится о форумчанах ещё на подлёте к Владивостоку ✈️
На борту «Аэрофлота» пассажиров встречал гастрономический привет от банка — крафтовые сыры российских фермеров 🧀❤️ Те самые, которые можно найти на маркетплейсе РСХБ «Своё Родное». Так что после ВЭФ гастрономический роман можно продолжить …
Форумчанка заглянула в деловую программу ВЭФ, отдельное внимание посвящено, конечно, защите дикой природы🐻🌲 И ВТБ это направление поддерживает уже не первый год — от проектов по сохранению редких видов до вполне конкретной инфраструктуры. Один из таких проектов — строительство центра реабилитации диких животных на Камчатке 🐾
А к ВЭФ экологическая история получила ещё и красивое продолжение — «Синюю книгу» 💙📘 Лимитир…
Разброс тем, которые модерирует Форумчанка, уже начинает немного пугать саму Форумчанку 😂
Профессиональный кругозор на ВЭФ расширился в сторону диких птиц 🦅
Форумчанка выступила модератором пленарной сессии Международного форума «День сокола», который уже четвёртый год проходит в рамках ВЭФ. И, кажется, это одна из самых красивых традиций форума ❤️
До сегодняшнего дня главное, что связывало Форумчанку с соколами, …
🔥87😁67❤37👏29🤔28👍24🥰19👎15
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @forumchanka_on_air. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
220 технологий @tech_220 · 37,221 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Форумчанка” (@forumchanka_on_air), 22,863 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forumchanka_on_air.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.