Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRexplore

Channel

PRexplore

@prexplore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,248subscribers

+287 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001081004414
TypeChannel
Username@prexplore
Created23 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prexplore

Growth

7,9508,2488,0995 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,956 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,950 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,977 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,064 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,144 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,181 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,246 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,248 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net +287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,905–8,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 03:568,248+2
3 Sept 2026, 08:178,246+65
30 Aug 2026, 20:398,181+37
28 Aug 2026, 01:268,144+80
21 Aug 2026, 08:078,064+87
18 Aug 2026, 11:467,977+27
15 Aug 2026, 19:587,950-6
12 Aug 2026, 08:487,956-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:237,959-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:047,961no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:477,961first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 8,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held45 (17 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total46,280
Reactions total1,261
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,249 reactions across 44 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,00044.5%
🔥33314.8%
🤝30513.6%
2139.47%
👏1285.69%
💅1175.20%
😈873.87%
❤‍🔥472.09%
🌚70.311%
😁50.222%
💯20.089%
👎10.044%
👾10.044%
😱10.044%
🙈10.044%
🤷‍♂10.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,720 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍19🔥9👏7💅5🤝54😈2❤‍🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,730 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Соцсеть Х сообщила, что раскрыла китайскую бот-ферму, которая через фальшивые аккаунты и комментарии на площадке продвигала нарративы против строительства дата-центров для ИИ в американских штатах (методы какие-то знакомые 🤔). Утверждается, что китайские злоумышленники форсили на площадке идею о росте стоимости электричества для конечных потребителей соседних с дата-центром регионов и вообще всячески критиковали эту

👍19🔥9🤝8👏4😈3💅21❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,800 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Испортил праздник фанатам и собрал дружный хейт издатель культовой игры Heroes might and magic III студия Ubisoft Entertainment: на днях она выпустила 3D-римейк, и приурочила к этому выход долгожданной Steam-версии оригинальной игры 1999 года, которая до сих пор не сходит с десктопов — ведь она прекрасна. И да, её до сих пор не было в Steam. Но горькое разочарование вместо чарующих звуков музыки Пола Ромеро ожидало

👍217🔥7🤝5😈4👏3💅2❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,250 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍287🤝7🔥5❤‍🔥1👎1👏1😈1

25 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,880 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Интересный увидели случай, который должен заставить задуматься агентства, предоставляющие услуги по продвижению: OpenAI заблокировала группу аккаунтов "из России", которые с помощью ChatGPT "распространяли дезинформацию", а именно — генерировали комментарии для размещения в Substack, Telegram, X, Facebook and LinkedIn в пользу некоего Burke Institute. В обличающем тексте новости не нашли никакого намека на политиче

👍19👏9🔥64💅4😈4🤝2❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,860 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Эйчары с энтузиазмом сваливают на ИИ тонны неразобранных резюме и радуются своей эффективности — но это плохие новости как для кандидатов, так, в итоге, и для работодателей. Исследование Принстонского и Чикагского университетов показало, что ИИ моментально формирует субъективную предвзятость к кандидатам на работу по критериям, которые никак не связаны с профессиональной пригодностью. И дело даже не в культурной одн

👍29🤝125🔥3❤‍🔥1👏1💅1💯1

24 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,900 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Важный тренд подметил Постмаркетинг: приоритеты компаний в работе с инфлюэнсерами смещаются с количественных метрик вроде охватов к легитимности высказывания. Пока локально — пост ссылается на исследование бразильского рынка коммуникаций. Согласно полученным данным, бренды в этой стране все чаще обращаются к реальным экспертам с релевантным бэкграундом, а не к просто популярным блогерам. Что вполне логично — в мире,

👍29🔥9🤝73💅3❤‍🔥1😈1

24 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,830 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Тогда как уничтожение бумажных книг ИИ-гигантами из сенсации превращается в отраслевой стандарт (вслед за Anthropic на этом попался Amazon), на спасение исчезающих знаний бросился отважный пиратский кораблик — онлайн-библиотека Anna's Archive, которая призвала пользователей загружать сканы любых бумажных книг на площадку. Администрация ресурса обещает признание и пожизненное членство каждому, кто загрузит даже неболь

👍27🔥65🤝4😈3❤‍🔥1👏1💅1

21 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,820 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Приз за фейспалм недели забирает Amazon, который на днях громко анонсировал "безопасную доставку" товаров дронами в 500 городах, но что-то сразу пошло не так. Завирусившееся видео того, как покупка с радостным всплеском отправляется прямиком в бассейн состоятельного клиента из Техаса, заставило журналистов вспомнить, что это уже не первый аналогичный случай: год назад появилось видео, как у кого-то коробка упала ряд

👍22🔥6👏5💅5🤝5😈41❤‍🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,830 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Интересный у нас произошёл случай. Решили мы вместе с каналом Журналисты и медийщики сравнить, в каких соцсетях сидят журналисты, а в каких — пиарщики. И вот, что вышло 🙈 Голосование пало жертвой массовой SERM-атаки в пользу цифровых продуктов отечественных корпораций — VK, Max и Дзен. Всей правды о том, что предпочитают журналисты, мы теперь, конечно, не узнаем. Зато становятся наглядны методы борьбы за аудиторию р

👍226🔥6🤝6👏4😈4💅3❤‍🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,870 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Специальность "Строительство" вытеснило "Рекламу и связи с общественностью" из ТОП-10 самых популярных у абитуриентов направлений, сообщил глава Минобрнауки Валерий Фальков. Кажется, дети начали что-то подозревать. А шутки про завод приняли как руководство к действию. #новости #тренды Сегодня о том, каким будет завтра. Подписаться 🧬

👍24🔥6🤝6😈53👏3💅3❤‍🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,410 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍28🤝64🔥4👏3💅2❤‍🔥1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @prexplore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRexplore” (@prexplore), 8,248 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prexplore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.