Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Птички в голове

Channel

Птички в голове

@ptichkamaman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,144subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622295617
TypeChannel
Username@ptichkamaman
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ptichkamaman

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1352,1442,139.56 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,139 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,143 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,144 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,139 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,135 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,142 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,137 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,139 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,143 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,144 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,134–2,145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:392,144+1
14 Sept 2026, 06:392,143+4
10 Sept 2026, 04:572,139+2
4 Sept 2026, 17:372,137-4
31 Aug 2026, 18:252,141-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:442,142+7
26 Aug 2026, 03:062,135-4
22 Aug 2026, 21:122,139-2
16 Aug 2026, 07:262,141-3
12 Aug 2026, 21:532,144+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:412,143+4
6 Aug 2026, 21:502,139+3
6 Aug 2026, 06:162,136no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:562,136first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

316 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9429.7%
👍4413.9%
😁4012.7%
custom 5368819762652527122299.18%
💯278.54%
206.33%
🤩103.16%
😎92.85%
❤‍🔥82.53%
😱82.53%
🏆72.22%
👌61.90%
🤯41.27%
😈30.949%
🙏30.949%
😍20.633%
🎃10.316%
🤝10.316%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ptichkamaman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC100 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Сериал След, серия Бестиарий 🤣

custom 53688197626525271221614😎91

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC119 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

вышла серия, где я снималась. вышла в мае. но есть только на пиратских ресурсах. выкладывать отрывок, где я бегаю и кричу?) 🤣

8😁3

6 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC144 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы постепенно привыкаем к мысли, что нейросети — это уже не игрушка, а вполне себе коллега. Иногда стажер. Иногда очень уверенный стажер, который не просит зарплату и не боится сводных таблиц. И тут я заметила еще один эффект. ❤️В июне мы набрали очередной поток стажеров. Резюме, кстати, было не так много, зато пришедшие ребята оказались очень четкими, толковыми и потенциально сильными. Даже обидно, что поработать п

14👍9💯8

4 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC166 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как я уже писала, мы начали учиться работать с ИИ. И не на уровне «зайди в ChatGPT, попроси отредактировать текст и собери структуру презентации». Мы учимся делать с ним то, что действительно может сильно сократить трудозатраты и освободить время. В идеале — не для того, чтобы работать еще больше, а чтобы наконец оставить себе немного пространства на мысли, решения и нормальную постановку задач. Хотя кого я обманыва

💯11😁74

30 Jul 2026, 06:51 UTC204 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У одной моей коллеги есть питон, кролик и кажется паук. Видимо она не попала в наше исследование, которое мы в Comunica провели совместно с «Лесным приютом». Мы спросили у пиарщиков, есть ли у них внутренний зверь питомец. И что получилось) ▫ Домашние животные есть у 88,1% респондентов — это и кошки, и собаки, а также муравьи, креветки и улитки; ▫ 25% специалистов коммуникаций взяли своего питомца из приюта, в 24%

custom 5368819762652527122138🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hub_skPhoto

☀️ Лето — пора отпусков и каникул. Свободного времени становится больше, возникают новые идеи и цели. Предлагаем вам провести последние дни июля с пользой и присоединиться к марафону вебинаров от МосХаб.Сколково. Вместе с экспертами отрасли разберём актуальные темы в ИТ, маркетинге и бизнесе — прямо в нашем сообществе ВКонтакте. Расписание и анонсы всех вебинаров станут доступны 29 июля на сайте МосХаб.Сколково.

👍6😍1😱1

28 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC218 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня обсуждали на клиентском статусе как ускорить согласование материалов. Собрали серию лайхаков. Сохраните себе) 🫠 Жалобно стоять у стола коллеги, шаркая ножкой, и молчать. 😞Регулярно подходить и грустно вздыхать, и, растягивая имя, нудеть: «Даааааш, Дашааааа» 💉У многих в офисе есть стеклянные будочки, можно подходить к ним,когда там сидит коллега, дышать на стекло, рисовать сердечко и писать внутри слово - K

😁156💯4

27 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC193 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @openspace_notes

Posted without readable text

10🏆7👌6👍2🎃1

23 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC284 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Приятно, когда так пишут наши адресаты) А вы что успели этим летом?

14

23 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC281 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rockpandaaahospitalityPhoto

Пример классного мерча от Лемана ПРО. Когда делаешь упор на сервис и вау) Наполнение: 1. Чек-лист что успеть летом 2. Дождевик 3. Фартук 4. Набор для мохито 5. Книга 6. Мелки (краски лета) Ну мед же, скажите? Дарите и удивляйте партнеров и блоггеров) Отели так тоже могут, поверьте!

👍18🤩10

22 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC283 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Попросила ChatGpt написать список вопросов, исходя из брифа, что хочу провести интервью с продюсером по работе с селебами. У чата gpt видимо это тоже больная тема - написал мне 145 вопросов. Почти все толковые. Боюсь их отправлять своему собеседнику) скажет, обалдели что ли в конец? А ведь обычно бриф и есть такая простыня))))

😁15💯4😈3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ptichkamaman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Надо было вчера
@nadobulovchera · 26,350
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Есть контакт?
@estcontact · 28,578
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Форумчанка
@forumchanka_on_air · 22,129
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
UnderПяр
@underpyar · 22,336
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Птички в голове” (@ptichkamaman), 2,144 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptichkamaman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.