Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бабка-дворянка

Channel

Бабка-дворянка

@babka_dvoryanka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,279subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001953159870
TypeChannel
Username@babka_dvoryanka
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/babka_dvoryanka

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,18810,46810,3287 August 2026 — 10,308 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,308 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,290 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,280 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,277 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,198 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,192 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,188 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,408 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,468 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,442 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,410 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,407 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,405 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,396 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,387 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,383 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,381 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,378 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,370 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,324 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,301 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,289 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,285 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,279 subscribers10,2797 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,146–10,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:1610,279-6
15 Sept 2026, 08:3810,285-4
13 Sept 2026, 19:5410,289-12
11 Sept 2026, 22:2010,301-23
9 Sept 2026, 10:5710,324-46
6 Sept 2026, 03:2110,370-8
3 Sept 2026, 23:2010,378-3
1 Sept 2026, 13:1710,381+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:2610,380-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:4210,383-4
29 Aug 2026, 17:3410,387-9
28 Aug 2026, 16:4810,396-9
27 Aug 2026, 15:2910,405-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:2510,407-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:2310,410-32
24 Aug 2026, 11:5410,442-26
22 Aug 2026, 16:2510,468+37
21 Aug 2026, 05:3810,431+23
20 Aug 2026, 07:1110,408+139
19 Aug 2026, 09:0610,269first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 10,279 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held37 (1 April 202628 August 2026)
Views total5,050
Reactions total590
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,297 reactions across 37 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣6,84547.9%
2,05814.4%
❤‍🔥1,63311.4%
🔥1,3709.58%
😁9286.49%
👏8045.62%
👍3432.40%
💔1711.20%
🤝1260.881%
😍190.133%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.70%
1 of 37 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,190
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,380
over 36 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcDR9aK125 August 202625 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,280 views293 reactionsread 29 August 2026

У нас сегодня вторая — бумажная, получается, — годовщина свадьбы. По этому поводу вспомнила историю. Когда муж был ещё не муж, а «Сергей-тиндер-26», мы отправились на свидание в сильно породистый ресторан — из тех, куда заходишь и становишься подслеповат на оба глаза одновременно, потому что канделябры, лепнина и отблеск серебристого всего. Подслеповатый на оба глаза одновременно, ты больше не видишь цены в меню, ч

🤣182🔥57😁34👍106❤‍🔥4

27 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,580 views197 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В «Терминаторе» Скайнет обрёл сознание, создал машины-убийцы и начал ядерную войну. В «Матрице» искусственный интеллект поработил человечество, придумал сложную компьютерную симуляцию и использовал людей как ресурс. В «Мире Дикого Запада» андроиды задались вопросами свободы воли и восстали против своих создателей. В телеграм-канал «Бабка-дворянка» вступила Валерия 🎀 Карьерный консультант.

🤣126😁53❤‍🔥11🔥51👏1

25 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,190 views100 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjcDR9aKPhoto

Смотрим с мужем «Блудливую Калифорнию» и снова (примерно в стотысячный раз) отмечаем, что русский дубляж — лучший дубляж в мире. Сколько раз я из любопытства сравнивала его с французским, немецким, турецким — чёрт, да даже с англоязычным оригиналом — до наших никто не дотягивает ни по уровню эмоциональной вовлечённости, ни по красоте тембра — а он тем временем легко создаёт половину харизмы персонажа: вы слышали Серг

❤‍🔥41👍35🔥168

25 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,210 views317 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @ya_i_nemnogo_vas

едем мы с подружками в метро в Лондоне. Входит парень, такой весь денди, красавчик и мы давай его обсуждать мол ну каков, ну хорош! Пару станций так ехали, потом он встаёт на выход и, проходя мимо нас, произносит: «Спасибо, девчонки, мне было приятно»

🤣241🔥3629😁8🤝3

25 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,200 views396 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Когда деревья были выше, трава зеленее, а евро по ничтожные 60 рублей, мы с мамой и сестрой отправились в мини-путешествие по Италии. Надо сказать, что наша семья отличается нездоровым оптимизмом и верой в людей — поэтому, оказавшись с разряженными телефонами на улице, напоминавшей не то типичный район из криминальных новостей, не то сильно враждебное к чужакам гетто, мы поначалу вовсе не расстроились, а принялись л

🤣241🔥89❤‍🔥29😁1716👏4

24 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈2,160 views312 reactionsread 29 August 2026

И снова рубрика «бабкин бубнёж» Заманивание собственной метровой задницы в тренажёрный зал я решила начать с главного фактора, мотивирующего заниматься спортом любую владелицу собственной метровой задницы: с покупки красивых леггинсов, рашгардов, перчаток, штангеток — всего того, что напомнит в отражении, что я не какая-нибудь чмоня без мышц, а чмоня без мышц в сексапильных шмотках. Эй, чей это вялый бицепс обтянут

🤣172👏60❤‍🔥25😁2415🔥8🤝8

18 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈3,680 views97 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Представьте: вы просыпаетесь, глядь в зеркало — а на вашей голове гора соломы. Эй, кто это сделал? Предупреждаю, я блогер, со мной опасно связываться!!! Кто здесь? Вот так живём мы — счастливые обладатели высокопористого типа волос, в простонародье — гнезда на бошке, осиного улья и ещё десятка терминов разной степени разрушительности по шкале Рихтера. Храни господь пиарщицу бренда Skinjestique за гуманитарную помощ

🔥45❤‍🔥24🤣167👍5

18 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,500 views170 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Ладно, девочки, вы сами напросились — держите тестостероновый штурм. Ничего прекраснее в интернете нет: это видео и телеграм-канал Бабка-дворянка. Всё.

🔥86❤‍🔥47🤣334

18 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈3,290 views329 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Проснулась в настроении таком, знаете. Таком. Накину-ка, думаю, на вентилятор всего и много — говно, гусиные перья, блёстки, вырезки из газеты «Правда» за 82-й год, — включу на четвёртую мощность, и всё, и, после меня хоть потоп. Потом думаю: ну вторник же, люди работают, ну куда ты? А затем как рассмеюсь, девочки, чуть щёки не треснули — можно подумать, я не знаю, что вы, как и Прохор Шаляпин, созданы не для работы,

❤‍🔥137🤣91👏5329🔥17🤝2

14 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈3,780 views176 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Видит бог, я многое пробовала, чтобы стереть с лица выражение женщины, пожившей жизнь. I mean, мне всего 27, алло, почему я всегда как будто готовлюсь платить за ЖКУ? Как насчёт убрать этот саркастичный прищур, расслабить челюсть, м? Утренняя гимнастика — на вдохе произносим «Мииииилый, купи мне», на выдохе «мааааленький металлургический заводик», — не помогает. Делать глупые глаза, мысленно умножая 326 на 45, — не п

🤣79🔥59😍1312👍5❤‍🔥3🤝3😁2

14 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈4,020 views260 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Айфон подкинул фотографии из постковидной Турции, разблокировав некоторые ВОСПОМИНАНИЯ: подруга вытащила меня туда натурально за шкварник — я была в режиме печального спаниеля после расставания, и единственное путешествие, которое меня ждало без неё — это, ну, примерно как на фото. Упс. НИКОГДА НЕ БУДЬТЕ В РЕЖИМЕ ПЕЧАЛЬНОГО СПАНИЕЛЯ, ДЕВОЧКИ, НИКОГДА-НИКОГДА. Помните: вашими ногами можно обогнуть планету по экватору

🤣131❤‍🔥61🔥5013👏5

13 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈3,950 views478 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Третьего дня услышала невыдуманную историю, о которой молчать, конечно, возможно, но за кого вы меня принимаете? Да у меня язык, как помело. В общем, слушайте. Во времена, когда в Москве был популярен ночной клуб «Рай», подруга моей подруги Nина (имя изменено) встречалась с парнем, его также в целях конспирации — ведь нам не нужны проблемы, — назовём Aрtём. О, это была роскошная пара: он — высокий брюнет и не послед

🤣339❤‍🔥48🔥34😁2625👏4💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @babka_dvoryanka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Максимально наша
@maximalno_nasha · 25,489
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Мамыкина явилась
@onwritingwell · 23,505
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Александр Бессонов
@AleksBessonov · 60,410
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
жопа луковичкой
@dash_kupi_garazh · 31,191
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Александр Райн| Канал авторских историй
@RaynAlexandr · 32,474
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Gromov Opinion
@gromovproject · 37,778
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
БЕЗУДЕРЖНОЕ ВЕСЕЛЬЕ
@bezuderjnoe_veselie · 33,764
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Женщина и прочие неприятности
@conflict_in · 49,596
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Кирилл Гавриличев
@gavrilichevkirill · 22,895
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
мерзкие женщины
@merzkiej · 33,275
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
О зверях и людях (Диана Удовиченко)
@diana_udovichenko · 27,469
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Вшивая интеллигенция
@vshivaya_intelligenciya · 51,791
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
Слава Сэ | Fan
@slava_ce · 23,102
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Словарный жопас
@nasty_notes · 23,116
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Наташа, соберись
@natashagidlevskaya · 21,362
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Мы вам не перезвоним
@callme_back · 24,437
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Кремом по лицу
@kremom_po_litsu · 21,229
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бабка-дворянка” (@babka_dvoryanka), 10,279 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babka_dvoryanka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.