Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 18—expl—crea

Channel

18—expl—crea

@eclecthoughts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,803subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783416178
TypeChannel
Username@eclecthoughts
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eclecthoughts

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,8032,8712,8376 August 2026 — 2,869 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,868 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,865 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,857 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,851 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,847 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,844 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,841 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,832 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,819 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,811 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,803 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,793–2,881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:012,803-8
12 Sept 2026, 08:162,811-8
8 Sept 2026, 12:352,819-13
3 Sept 2026, 15:382,832-9
31 Aug 2026, 11:032,841-3
28 Aug 2026, 13:082,844-3
21 Aug 2026, 17:062,847-4
18 Aug 2026, 14:362,851-6
15 Aug 2026, 19:222,857-8
12 Aug 2026, 19:132,865-6
9 Aug 2026, 22:112,871+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:202,868-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:372,869first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20341.1%
🔥10220.6%
👍8918.0%
😁8517.2%
😐102.02%
👎51.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eclecthoughts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC141 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мой новый головной убор для записи особо важных подкастов-лекций-вебинаров

😁9🔥54

3 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC454 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обычная Яндекс Погода, а тексты — муа Не нейтральное «жарко», а «припекает» — муа Не просто «припекает», а ещё что делать — муа Не просто что делать, а «надевать крутые очки» — муа

31🔥9😁7👍4

2 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC456 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Компьютерная медитация Я много лет медитировал сидя: тишина в комнате, жопа на стуле, приоткрытое окошко — полностью контролируемая среда В сидячей медитации обычно тренируется узкое внимание на чем-то одном — дыхании: отвлекался, замечал, возвращал фокус Затем, когда сидячая медитация перестала наполнять, а больше возбуждала тревогу, начал практиковаться на улице — во время ходьбы. Там больше вещей охватываешь: т

🔥10👍64

30 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC580 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

24 материала о редактуре и ценности Собирал материалы с 22 года. Сразу видна ценностная школа, на которой я создавался Чек-лист для редактора. Тема, смысл, начало статьи, заги, структура, подача, иллюстрации Почему ваша картинка к статье — говно. Про информативные иллюстрации Как (и зачем) писать о банальном. Выложить багаж, объяснить от обратного Как делать карточки в соцсети. Редкий гуглдок Люды Сарычевой Сма

21🔥9👍5

29 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC487 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, атас, я нашёл свою редакторскую базу данных, которую вёл с 2022 года, кажется На скриншоте — самая лучшая интерпретация редакторских грейдов, бессмертно лучшая Её полезно перечитывать раз в недельку, чтобы напоминать себе о том, как круто работать Забирайте → https://www.notion.so/8d91c56dad5749f28b19c0df7a299587 Автора забыл, простите. Вроде Саша С...

🔥106👍3

29 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC483 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Участник нашёл стажировку в моём закрытом канале Это главная новость. Всего 11 человек, а уже случилась великая ценность Что уже обсудили → 1. Состояние рынка и как на нём искать работу по моей версии 2. Нейросети и как с ними уживается субъектность и агентность 3. Поделился бесплатным курсом: как создавать кейсы для B2B 4. Куча моей ежедневной работы Что у нас дальше по плану → 1. Завтра отправлю ребятам сво

8🔥5👍3👎1

23 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC608 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кабель-менеджмент рабочего места сложнее, чем создавать цифровые продукты

👍13😁11🔥61

23 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC592 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как доносить ценность продукта через понимание ценности в JTBD Во фреймворке создания продуктов Jobs To Be Done определение ценности звучит так: разница между Job/Solution Cost и Job/Solution Benefits. Сейчас упрощу и расскажу подробнее 🔘 Job/Solution Cost — это все ресурсы, которые нужно потратить для того, чтобы выполнить работу (задачу) Например, главная работа (задача) человека — слушать аудио-книгу во время п

17🔥7👍5

20 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTCviews —

18—expl—crea pinned «Создаю для вас закрытый канал Там у нас нарисуется более тесный контакт. Это будет моим «прямым эфиром» и базой данных Что буду туда закидывать (первая версия продукта): 🔘 Кусочки моей работы: буду показывать, какие решения принимаю и почему. Много скриншотов…»

20 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC625 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самое интимное сейчас: история чатов в ChatGPT или Claude Раньше все боялись, что кто-то может проникнуть в твою историю браузера — и увидеть, хи-хи-ха-ха, порнушку Сейчас история поисковых запросов в гугле ощущается не так стрёмно. Она всего лишь показывает, куда человек ходил, и оставляет пространство для дюжины толкований: «Ну и что такого в порносайте, вдруг я собирал материал для статьи?» Другое дело, более ч

😁34😐107

18 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC632 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не доверяйте карманам Как только познакомились с новым карманом, сразу навострите ушки Он может казаться надёжным спутником, но его единственное искреннее желание — освободиться: в неожиданный момент выплюнуть электронку, паспорт с уникальной фоткой или презерватив Каждому карману полагается проверка. Засуньте в него тот самый неиспользованный презерватив, заштопайте строительным степлером два-три раза — и забудьт

😁157🔥7

18 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC510 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тестирую простой стилистический приём — стрелочки Здесь стрелка вниз — способ последовательно погрузить в проблему таблица кажется зрелым решением ↓ в неё приходит человек и начинает декодировать данные ↓ выясняется, что таблица ничего не объясняет ↓ расшифровка интерфейса становится отдельной работой ↓ внешне аккуратный экран всё равно даёт тяжёлый опыт Прочитал один пункт — идём дальше, на следующий уровень посл

12👍5🔥5😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eclecthoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Это работа для редактора
@glvrd_job · 22,828
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Купрум
@tolkosprosit · 43,068
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 46,565
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Паша и его прокрастинация
@abbsol · 29,625
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,535
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,350
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Работа в медиапроектах Т-Банка
@tj_collega · 31,896
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Work for writers
@Work4writers · 34,194
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 September 2026
По ходу разберёмся
@pohodu_media · 28,230
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 43,105
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Ждём резюме l Лайфхакер
@zdemcv · 76,292
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 19 August 2026
Норм удалёнка
@normremote · 31,179
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
Копирайтер, редактор — удаленная работа
@self_ma · 33,476
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Т-Бизнес секреты
@bs_business · 70,462
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Работа с текстами — вакансии
@work_editor · 31,298
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Job for Media & Content
@forallmedia · 23,246
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 September 2026
Норм работа
@normrabota · 135,835
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“18—expl—crea” (@eclecthoughts), 2,803 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eclecthoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.