Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Makarov Media Lab💡

Channel

Makarov Media Lab💡

@ivanmakarovlab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,864subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601559513
TypeChannel
Username@ivanmakarovlab
Created23 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ivanmakarovlab

Growth

1,8621,8771,869.56 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,873 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,875 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,876 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,870 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,865 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,862 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,864 subscribers1,8646 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,860–1,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:591,864+2
3 Sept 2026, 14:211,862-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:171,865-1
28 Aug 2026, 01:241,866-4
25 Aug 2026, 01:361,870-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:071,872-4
18 Aug 2026, 02:031,876-1
12 Aug 2026, 04:581,877+2
9 Aug 2026, 11:541,875+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:061,873+7
6 Aug 2026, 06:471,866no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:221,866first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1726.6%
💯1320.3%
🔥1015.6%
😁914.1%
710.9%
custom 528272254758919622223.13%
🙏23.13%
🤯23.13%
🕊11.56%
😢11.56%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rushufflePhoto

Хуже, чем в Париже Я думаю, многие обратили внимание, в какую клоаку превратился бывший модный район Китай-Город. Там теперь каждый вечер пиздят кого-нибудь на проезжей части, а в субботу туда лучше вообще не заходить, если вы в чистом, чтобы не быть случайно обблеванным. Судя по видосам, делают это совершенно не нефоры, а какая-то мефедроновая гопота. И потому совершенно неудивительно, что нефорский дворик или скве

🤯2😢1

7 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC131 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как работать с разными образами будущего Будущее всегда выглядит иначе, нежели мы способны его себе вообразить. Это цитата Станислава Лема, который подчеркивал, что будущее не будет «химически очищенным» от наших проблем и страхов. Оно будет переписывать правила, ставить перед жестким выбором и требовать жертв, заставляя пересматривать многое из того, что сегодня кажется незыблемым. Однако то, каким мы представляем

🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC171 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

впрочем лучше Валеры пока никто не пошутил

😁41

7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC204 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кинопоиск то убирал, то вот снова вернул оценку Колобку. Это вообще все больше похоже на социальный протест. И чем дальше в лес, тем больше будет таких историй. Зеленый слоник там очень удачно приютился

😁3

7 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC358 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Говорят самолет пролетел на каком то барьере звука. Эффектно конечно делается трафик и новости в 26м году

👍6

7 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC417 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А все же слышали взрыв хлопок?

💯13

6 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC424 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Живые есть?

🙏2custom 52827225475891962222

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC327 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TerraInMedia

Что еще рассказал Евгений Капьев: 📚Рост "Эксмо" по итогам первой половины года - +8% в деньгах и в штуках. То есть, рост цен на книги остановился. А фактический спрос при этом показал рекорд за последние годы 📚В топе - хилинг-проза: "Если все кошки в мире исчезнут" (все еще считаю переоцененным чтивом, но понимаю, почему нравится другим), "Кафе на краю Земли" и "Бабушка сказала сидеть тихо" (пока не добралась, но К

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC268 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @frank_media

📖 В Казахстане искусственный интеллект будут изучать с первого класса школы, сообщило Министерство просвещения в своем телеграм-канале В начальной школе учащиеся будут знакомиться с ИИ на «простых примерах из повседневной жизни». В 5-9 классах их научат среди прочего «эффективно» использовать ИИ в учебе, а в старшей школе казахстанцам объяснят принципы работы ИИ, в том числе основы машинного обучения, нейронных сете

2😁2

6 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @prbyyarPhoto

TikTok Live ВНЕЗАПНО захватил половину стримингового рынка Детально изучил свежий отчёт аналитиков Stream Hatchet за второй квартал 2026. И правда, как пишет «База Киберспорта», «кто только не дрался с Twitch, а из-за угла вышел TikTok, хлопнул их по голове своими механиками — и занял трон». Но там есть ещё сумасшедшие цифры-факты в плане ЧМ по футболу-2026 на стримингах. ВОТ ОСНОВНЫЕ ВЫВОДЫ: 📊 TikTok Live — 8,9 м

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ivanmakarovlab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Makarov Media Lab💡” (@ivanmakarovlab), 1,864 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivanmakarovlab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.