Channel
@zenkonserva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002345451555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zenkonserva |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zenkonserva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 61 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 60 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 9 | 31.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 13.8% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жуткая история о штрафах за обзоры товаров: https://t.me/gorkunova_pravo/505 Самое ужасное, что на блогера никто не жаловался. ФАС проводит собственный мониторинг соцсетей и протоколирует даже сторис, которые через сутки пропадут. Вывод один: если делаете честный обзор продукта, а не маркированную рекламу, не ставьте кликабельную ссылку на производителя/продавца и не побуждаете пользователя к походу в конкретный м…
🔥2
Если вам скучно жить, то вы можете в строке гугла набрать site:chat.deepseek.com/share/ и читать то, что люди спрашивали дипсик. Завораживающе
👍2
С момента удаления Дзена из App Store прошел почти месяц. Как изменилась доля iOS в трафике? Почти никак. Немножко выросла. Было 7,56% за последние 30 дней, стало 7,99%. Сегодня нас выкинули из Google Play, так что андроиды тоже зафиксирую — 67,62% за последние 30 дней. Через месяц проверим, уходит ли читатель. *Цифры — метрика, готовый отчет «Операционные системы», доля по визитам
❤4
Дзен разослал авторам письма о новом способе заработка — через РСЯ. Некоторые авторы видят в этом тревожный звоночек к отмене монетизации.
Дзен выкинули из App Store 😢 *Дополню. За последние 30 дней доля айфонного трафика у меня 7,56%. Не так уж и мало
😁2😢2
Из опроса Магнита — список платформ для заработка на блоге.
😁3
— Ты все ещё сама или на ишаке? — ??? Оказывается, так нейронку называют в писательской среде.
😁3
Как сейчас работает Дзен и что писать, чтоб читали — интервью с Толокольниковым. Подтверждает гипотезу, что аудиторию получает тема.
Как работают алгоритмы новостной ленты? Об этом Насте рассказал управляющий директор «Дзена» Александр Толокольников. Они также обсудили, как ИИ меняет информационную среду и как писать тексты, чтобы их точно прочитали. MAX ВЕДЫ | VK ВЕДЫ | Наш сайт | Likee ВЕДЫ
🤔1
Отбой. Кортекса для авторов можно не ждать, пока запуска не было, в планах подключение СМИ. Кто первый из СМИ слямзил тему у блогера, тот и первоисточник.
🤡1
Кортекс должен выполнять функции механизма борьбы со слопом. Ну, дай бог, чтоб этот новый робот начал давать приоритет оригинальным авторам. Через пару недель посмотрим, будут ли перемены в топах.
👍1
Дзен презентовал новую ИИ-архитектуру «Кортекс», которая позволит быстрее распознавать уникальные инфоповоды, эффективнее верифицировать первоисточники и предлагать новости по узким интересам и с учетом обсуждений в мессенджерах. Но это ещё не все новинки Дзена в области искуственного интеллекта. Компания представила также новый инструмент для блогеров - ИИ студию. Она даёт возможность: - адаптировать тексты под мо…
🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @zenkonserva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дзен. Операция «реанимация»” (@zenkonserva), 61 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zenkonserva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.