Друзья, это не реклама, но если вам или вашим братьям/сёстрам/детям от 18 до 23 лет, очень советую вам проект, в организации которого я сам участвую. Проект называется неУниверситет. Это бесплатная программа по прокачке студентов в сферах, которым не учат в вузе. 90% программы проходит онлайн. 2 раза в неделю по вечерам будут онлайн-лекции по важным темам: личные финансы, здоровье и психология, построение отношений…

Channel
Мастриды
@mustreads
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
45,187subscribers
-253 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001010812972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mustreads |
| Description | Рациональность, тренды общества, лучшие книги и статьи Моя биография и ссылки на основные проекты: t.me/mustreads/4337 Мой Ютюб: YouTube.com/@bookchel Мой Инст: Instagram.com/mustreader Реклама: @darina_ranadi РКН: clck.ru/3G5tWQ |
| Created | 3 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mustreads |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 45,187 | -7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 45,194 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 45,199 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 45,210 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 45,220 | -29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 45,249 | +9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 45,240 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:09 | 45,246 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:08 | 45,250 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 45,251 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 45,261 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 45,268 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 45,278 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 45,282 | -90 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 45,372 | +78 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 45,294 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 45,293 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 45,303 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 45,306 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 45,310 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 45,187 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,220
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (18 May 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 36,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈597
- Videos
- ≈19
- Links
- ≈2,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 3.33%
- 1 of 30 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 4,120
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 8,350
- over 29 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VfnxyWbKYQ | 1 | 8 September 2026 | 8 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 10 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Заставляет задуматься недавно опубликованный главным стартап-акселератором мира Y Combinator список приоритетных ниш, в стартапы в которых они готовы инвестировать. Главный тренд на осень 26-го — переход ИИ в материальный мир. Стартапы на стыке хард- и софтвера. В том числе, один из пунктов списка добавлен туда по заявке американской армии (любопытно, что YC за такое вроде не пока не стали кэнселлить, хотя в 2018 го…
В марте исполнится пять лет с момента нашей эмиграции. За это время мы с Катериной многое пережили! Сначала переезд в Турцию с сотней кило багажа и двумя животными, потом проблемы с документами (одно время даже пришлось провести в статусе нелегалов, потому что нам не продлили турецкий ВНЖ). Вторая эмиграция — теперь уже в Казахстан, в 2023-м. Адаптация, налаживание быта с нуля, перевоз грузовика вещей из России. Боль…
Мастрид, с мыслями по итогам прочтения которого я буду ходить в фоновом режиме ещё долго. Рекомендую прочесть всем: https://ai-2040.com/ Подробные рассуждения про текст войсом скоро опубликую на своём обновлённом канале @godnoplease (подписывайтесь, если ещё не сделали этого — там в несколько раз чаще мастриды от меня!) #ИИ_мастрид #тренд_мастрид #золотой_фонд_мастридов
Сегодня я очень вдохновлён, потому что наконец-то придумал, как мне почаще радовать вас контентом и побороть перфекционизм, из-за которого здесь редко выходят посты. Всё дело в том, что я много читаю мастридов, у меня всегда много интересных мыслей и инсайтов, которыми хочется делиться с миром, но: (1) мои стандарты высокие, и обычно я решаю, что для "Мастридов" та или иная мысль или текст недостаточно мощные (2) у…
История, о которой я больше всего думаю в последние недели – взлом сайта Hugging Face ИИ-агентами OpenAI. Например, мы обсуждали её в вышедшем на днях подкасте с Артёмом Родичевым и с ChatGPT 5.6-Sol. На днях появились новые подробности произошедшего, от которых у меня пошли мурашки по коже. Кажется, это похоже на то, как мог бы произойти ИИ-апокалипсис. Только в этот раз человечество отделалось лёгким испугом: всё-…
ИИ уже умеет мастерски манипулировать нами и "сбегать" от надзора исследователей. Что дальше? Обсуждаем это с Артёмом Родичевым — создателем ИИ-компаньонов ex-Human и постоянным гостем моего подкаста. Говорим о грядущем ИИ-апокалипсисе, гонке США и Китая, вечной битве Open AI и Anthropic и не только. А ещё в подкасте появился новый соведущий. Кто это — узнаете в выпуске: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mOj31Am-TEs
Вышла моя новая статья для журнала "Номер" — гайд о том, чем заняться в короткую поездку в Алмату. Материал основан на местах, куда мы водили гостей нашей свадьбы. Даже такая взыскательная публика, как наши друзья со всего мира, была впечатлена! Всем советую Алмату как место для путешествия в любой сезон (зимой можно совместить с катанием на лыжах или борде, летом — с прогулками по горам). Если последуете моим реком…
Чем больше у меня информации, тем легче мне принимать решения и понимать себя. Всё благодаря одной привычке: я пользуюсь любой возможностью узнать что-то о себе. Подкасты с самыми разными гостями (включая тех, с кем я не согласен), психотерапия, жизненные челленджи типа переезда в другую страну, медицинские тесты — все эти инструменты использую регулярно. Поэтому несколько лет назад я и решил пройти ДНК-тест. Я ожи…
ИИ уже сейчас знает о вас больше, чем жена, лучший друг и психолог. Можно ли оцифровать человеческую психику и создать свою «цифровую душу»? И главный вопрос: кому она будет принадлежать? Говорим об этом с Андреем Кисловым — нейроученым и CEO стартапа Synthius AI, который создает память для ИИ по принципам работы человеческого мозга. А еще разбираемся, какому ИИ опаснее всего доверять свои секреты, как нейросеть уч…
Сегодня мне исполнилось 33. Немного о том, насколько я одержим шахматами: решил участвовать в чемпионате Алматы несмотря на то, что его последний игровой день пришелся на мой ДР. В итоге сегодня 8 часов провёл за доской в напряженных интеллектуальных баталиях и только в десятом часу вечера вернулся домой. Выступил неплохо: 6.5 очков из 9, разделил 4-14 места, по доп. показателям стал восьмым (видимо, получаю призовы…
Возможно, когда-нибудь я напишу мастрид о том, как в эмиграции организовать свадьбу на почти 100 человек в стилистике дореволюционной России. Но пока что оцените фото!
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @mustreads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@DLTcrypto · 91 postSlang Bang! / Слэнг Бэнг!
@REAL_slangbang · 721 postCoffee Break
@coffeebreak · 381 postGOD, NO (Мастридер)
@godnoplease · 3,2511 postHabitLab ✓ Катерина Акулич
@habitlab · 2,6351 postМаствотч
@mustwatch · 21,4841 postBIOHACK | БИОТЕХНОЛОГИИ
@thisbiohack · 7,2361 postUrban English
@urban_english · 211 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@mustwatch · 21,48411 postsSlang Bang! / Слэнг Бэнг!
@REAL_slangbang · 722 postsАрхитектурная труба
@archtruba · 6221 postТри сигмы
@beyond3sigmas · 1,7401 postКанал 767
@Channel767 · 41 postЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,0331 postDLTcrypto
@DLTcrypto · 91 postДоктор Z прописал
@docpro · 139,6501 postHabitLab ✓ Катерина Акулич
@habitlab · 2,6351 postРеклама есть?
@influencealive · 4111 postMash
@mash · 3,096,8041 postМосквач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,111,0051 postНамочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,5251 postTelegram Info
@tginfo · 83,1371 post9 утра | Новости и анонсы
@v9utra · 74,1881 postИлья Варламов
@varlamov · 237,0491 postЖизнь замечательного человека
@vlasaf_filasaf · 3871 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zamesin · 50,414#1
@ctodaily · 33,689#2
@Matskevich · 25,302#3
@justakindreminder · 36,685#4
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,000#5
@mspiridonov · 66,824#6
@prostopushka · 4,544#7
@mustchess · 4,050#8
@denissexy · 137,325#9
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#10
@RationalAnswer · 107,884#11
@addmeto · 71,835#12
@whalesgohigh · 61,691#13
@yurydud · 864,661#14
@seeallochnaya · 79,594#15
@techsparks · 46,537#16
@disruptors_official · 73,061#17
@svtvnews · 113,037#18
@ai_newz · 96,889#19
@kyrillic · 61,020#20
@vas3k_club · 11,239#21
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005#22
@eschulmann · 303,468#23
@temalebedev · 968,245#24
@kontext_channel · 838,100#25
@hoolinomics · 99,279#26
@lentachold · 392,921#27
@thebell_io · 105,282#28
@startupoftheday · 60,449#29
@uxlive · 35,985#30
@SergeXXI · 4,460#31
@cryptovalerii · 30,829#32
@beastinthegarden · 679#33
@groks · 43,050#34
@alexandrshtefanov · 191,276#35
@zamesin_flow · 8,486#36
@Doctor_Kovalev · 3,069#37
@auantonov · 321,690#38
@vcnews · 112,033#39
@banksta · 438,140#40
@bezaspera · 73,225#41
@ontologics · 3,453#42
@retra · 165,509#43
@minutavminutu · 166,652#44
@sale_caviar · 192,936#45
@aavst2022 · 176,254#46
@cryptoEssay · 62,598#47
@ryba_lotsman · 52,481#48
@ftsec · 19,395#49
@kashinguru · 75,441#50
@mrlibertarian · 30,056#51
@dumik · 22,244#52
@pezduzalive · 372,470#53
@brokendance · 80,370#54
@Shmit16 · 17,565#55
@trap_critics · 29,747#56
@thequietplace · 51,349#57
@temno · 79,763#58
@fe_city_boy · 27,347#59
@avvablog · 10,945#60
@Theedinorogblog · 43,821#61
@furydrops · 28,365#62
@fichism · 25,378#63
@votyakov_ar_life · 7,148#64
@NeuralShit · 53,680#65
@tasteofrain · 11,453#66
@proproduct · 38,826#67
@trendriven · 717#68
@stalin_gulag · 300,961#69
@fedyabooker · 79,200#70
@knifemedia · 101,812#71
@yashin_russia · 136,933#72
@nplusone · 64,280#73
@aioftheday · 43,807#74
@t_jrnl · 98,720#75
@lider · 176,017#76
@cgevent · 52,361#77
@aihappens · 14,506#78
@betternotworse · 28,526#79
@danokhlopkov · 13,689#80
@augmentek · 1,587#81
@d_code · 404,952#82
@dbeskromny · 152,750#83
@yashernet · 5,330#84
@boris_again · 17,596#85
@Finindie · 72,841#86
@rationalnumbers · 25,686#87
@prostoecon · 295,976#88
@norimyxxxo · 154,423#89
@vasil_topolev · 44,432#90
@rebrykblog · 12,228#91
@markofglory · 14,731#92
@dukaliti · 123,032#93
@kinopoisk · 806,604#94
@minaevlife · 318,729#95
@pppanchik · 2,498#96
@Cronenberg1664 · 41,358#97
@donttouchmyface · 55,148#98
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PsyEducation · 59,345
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@justakindreminder · 36,685
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
@ThinkCritical · 47,239
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@hochu_domoj · 30,196
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
@namochimanturu · 56,525
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
@flibusta · 163,312
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
@litsomel · 30,536
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
@RationalAnswer · 107,884
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
@dailyeng · 73,242
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@techsparks · 46,537
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
@DenisSemenikhin · 34,420
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…|date=20221114144409 }} - Мастриды[https://t.me/mustreads/2107 Мастриды] {{Wayback|url=https://t.me/mustreads/2107 |date=20221114122844 }} - Telegram…”
read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мастриды” (@mustreads), 45,187 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mustreads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.