Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,174–30,289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:20
30,196
+8
16 Sept 2026, 14:17
30,188
-10
14 Sept 2026, 17:41
30,198
+11
13 Sept 2026, 00:39
30,187
-11
11 Sept 2026, 03:15
30,198
-2
8 Sept 2026, 07:35
30,200
+4
5 Sept 2026, 05:00
30,196
-2
3 Sept 2026, 08:39
30,198
-1
2 Sept 2026, 05:12
30,199
-9
1 Sept 2026, 07:46
30,208
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:55
30,212
-5
30 Aug 2026, 06:57
30,217
+3
29 Aug 2026, 05:15
30,214
-9
28 Aug 2026, 05:38
30,223
+7
27 Aug 2026, 08:15
30,216
-1
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
30,217
-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:37
30,222
-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:15
30,225
+18
22 Aug 2026, 13:07
30,207
-14
21 Aug 2026, 01:36
30,221
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 30,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
18 (29 June 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
54,910
Reactions total
2,809
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈86
Links
≈380
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
6,348 reactions across 18 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,037
32.1%
🔥
1,340
21.1%
💩
1,245
19.6%
👍
495
7.80%
😁
277
4.36%
🤯
212
3.34%
😢
195
3.07%
🤣
142
2.24%
💯
75
1.18%
👀
34
0.536%
😱
31
0.488%
💔
28
0.441%
🥰
28
0.441%
😭
24
0.378%
👏
23
0.362%
😨
17
0.268%
🍌
14
0.221%
👎
12
0.189%
🙏
11
0.173%
🤡
11
0.173%
23 further kinds
97
1.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,348 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 18 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hochu_domoj. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
14,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
14,200
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwqwP3f
1
29 June 2026
29 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Новый ролик в эфире!
https://youtu.be/jiv0Goy7mvk
В новом видео я через традиционную кухню Непала пытаюсь понять местную жизнь и культуру.
Как до сих пор работает кастовая система, как стране живется с молодым премьер-министром рэпером, почему яйца до сих пор считаются символом богатства, а за поедание говядины можно сесть в тюрьму.
Как обычно, красиво, вкусно и питательно не только для желудка, но и для мозгов!
…
Очень романтическая история случилась недавно.
Приходит мне имейл: “Леня, привет! Ты нас не знаешь”.
Обожаю, когда так начинаются письма - сразу обещают какое-то приключение.
Дальше оказывается, что пишет мне русскоязычная пара из Берлина. Ютуб сообщил им, что они входят в 0,1% моих самых постоянных зрителей. А еще они мечтали пожениться в Нью-Йорке и скоро приедут сюда для этого. Но у них нет свидетеля. Поэтому они…
Офигеть историю про Папуа, попы и папика напечатали в New Yorker (на самом деле, там не смешно)
Начинается все, как рассказ про гениального ученого с забавной фамилией Гайдузек, который получил Нобелевскую премию за изучение страшной болезни куру, от которой мерли люди в Папуа Новой Гвинее. Симптомы выглядят так, будто в тебя вселился злой дух. Но оказалось, что просто не нужно есть мозги своих умерших врагов, потом…
Если этот пост наберет 300 какашек, я, наконец, начну что-то выкладывать и рассказывать про нашу эпичную одиссею к племени короваев в Папуа.
Для разогреву держите несколько фоточек с пленки. Удивительно на них смотреть, потому что у Рокфелера, которого где-то в тех краях съели, все выглядело так же - ничего не поменялось.
UPD: нормально вы какашками бросаетесь!
Это я 12 лет назад в капсульном отеле в Токио.
ЭТО ПОСТ ДЛЯ БЫСТРЫХ И АВАНТЮРНЫХ
Как видите, у меня в руках селфи-палка, но это не значит, что я женщина или балерина. И блогером я тогда тоже еще не был. Я приехал на конференцию про какое-то там будущее, которое строит молодежь, хотя ни строителем будущего, ни молодым я уже не был. Это был просто способ почти нахаляву попасть в Японию. И мы две недели делали презент…
КОЛУМБИЮ ОБЛИЖЕШЬ!
Последний ролик из колумбийской серии уже на канале!
Шлифанем этот цикл большим видосом про еду, где, набивая щеки, будем обсуждать местную жизнь, привычки, традиции, проблемы и радости. Как обычно, еда - это только социальный лубрикант, а настоящая пища тут - для ума.
Побываем в баре, который открыли партизаны-сепаратисты, сходим в домашнюю самогоноварильню, попробуем самый лучший в мире хлеб (…
ВАКАНСИИ В «ХОЧУ ДОМОЙ»
Некоторые в нашей команде быстро выгорают от переизбытка впечатлений, количества голых жоп на монтаже и неуемной тяги к бродяжничеству. Поэтому ищем троих спецов, готовых жертвовать собой за деньги (платить можем и криптой, и свиньями)
РЕЖИССЕР МОНТАЖА
Собирать большие ролики из терабайта материала, снятого бесталанным оператором. Часто на английском. Начать нужно будет с хард левела - фильм…
АНТРОПОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ЭРОТИКА
Короваи, племя, к которому мы сейчас ездили в Папуа, изобрели довольно уникальный способ прикрывать интимные места. Можно сказать, свой эксклюзивный дизайн нижнего белья.
Они используют для этого лист дерева, который наматывают особым образом.
Но одна загадка мучила нас всю экспедицию.
Уважаемые знатоки, внимание вопрос: где писюн?
Впечатлительным фотки лучше не открывать.
Вернулся из экспедиции своей мечты.
13 лет назад я увидел в «Мире наизнанку» племя короваев - людей далеко в джунглях Папуа, которые живут в домах на деревьях. Тогда мне казалось, что это абсолютно недостижимое место и нереальное путешествие.
И вот спустя 13 лет мы поехали туда вместе с Сашей Потоцким, который тогда помогал «Миру наизнанку» их снимать. Еще и свозили с собой маленькую группу завсегдатаев туров «Хочу …
Новое видео на канале!
Остросюжетная, высокоградусная и высокогорная история о том, как я решил найти самые лучшие хинкали в Грузии, вышел из гостиницы в теплом Батуми, а оказался в снежных горах.
Чтобы найти идеальные хинкали, я пас баранов и бухал с пастухами, пытался долететь на вертолете до изолированных горных деревень, слушал бесконечные тосты и дегустировал бессчетное количество хинкалей.
Ну а по пути узнал…
Ролик про хинкали выйдет завтра, чтобы вы нагуляли аппетит.
А пока поделюсь старинным грузинским фильмом «Пастухи Тушети» - мы будем говорить о нем в ролике. И о пастухах там будет много.
Тушети - изолированный горный регион Грузии, попасть куда можно только летом. В остальное время все занесено снегом и жить там остаются всего 16 человек. В полной изоляции на 8 месяцев!
https://youtu.be/qqZgOL4BFAE?is=7OqOFFH96l7…
❤68🔥32👍12👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hochu_domoj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПЛАНЕТКА / культовый канал @petenkaplanetka · 58,698 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Alexander Pilot - Путешествие с Пилотами @dashapilotessa · 30,962 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
Трэвелхакер @trvlhacker · 23,218 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хочу домой - Путешествия, в которые вы не поедете” (@hochu_domoj), 30,196 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hochu_domoj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
