Йоп, Ян! Тут ты найдешь факты о самых разных вещах, которые нас окружают.
По коммерции и контенту: [email protected]
Личный тг-канал Яна: @yantoples_official
Наш подкаст ТОПКАСТ: @topcast_show
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://rkn.link/NA2
Created
20 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -15,618. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 508,722–529,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:41
511,065
-586
15 Sept 2026, 17:18
511,651
-556
13 Sept 2026, 23:17
512,207
-417
12 Sept 2026, 07:59
512,624
-898
10 Sept 2026, 03:55
513,522
-1,155
6 Sept 2026, 22:40
514,677
-775
4 Sept 2026, 11:20
515,452
-498
2 Sept 2026, 22:57
515,950
-414
1 Sept 2026, 23:34
516,364
-450
31 Aug 2026, 20:34
516,814
-486
30 Aug 2026, 22:49
517,300
-289
29 Aug 2026, 22:12
517,589
-385
28 Aug 2026, 21:57
517,974
-309
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
518,283
-350
27 Aug 2026, 03:33
518,633
-373
26 Aug 2026, 06:43
519,006
-328
25 Aug 2026, 03:54
519,334
-407
23 Aug 2026, 23:57
519,741
-687
22 Aug 2026, 10:47
520,428
-641
20 Aug 2026, 23:39
521,069
first reading
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.80%
avg views ÷ 511,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
45,000
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
92 (23 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
2,159,400
Reactions total
52,356
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈447
Links
≈3,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 43s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94,005 reactions across 83 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
43,781
46.6%
🙈
5,234
5.57%
🐳
5,095
5.42%
👀
4,530
4.82%
🎃
4,190
4.46%
🤯
3,627
3.86%
🕊
2,968
3.16%
🗿
2,864
3.05%
🔥
2,536
2.70%
custom 5472009457200277262
2,534
2.70%
⚡
2,291
2.44%
👻
2,051
2.18%
custom 5372951839018850336
1,981
2.11%
👾
1,940
2.06%
custom 5467491306223730835
1,249
1.33%
💅
1,247
1.33%
😢
840
0.894%
😱
811
0.863%
custom 5371081166013078244
745
0.793%
😇
742
0.789%
10 further kinds
2,749
2.92%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110,954 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
164
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 91 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toplesofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.09%
1 of 92 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
45,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
49,200
over 90 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqv2RTQP
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Запускаем гадания по архиву NASA!
По этой ссылке на каждый день приходится одна космическая фотография от NASA. Если вы родились позже 16 июня 1995 года, то можете найти там свой день рождения. А если раньше, то просто важную для вас дату: день знакомства с кем-то близким, например.
Скидывайте в комментарии фото и дату, выберем самый красивый день!
🍄 Недавно вышел большой тест всех нейронок на... грибах 🍄
Лучше всех справилась Gemini 3.8 Flash: она правильно определила гриб в 65% случаев. GPT-5.6 Sol с первого раза угадал только 42%, DeepSeek V4 — 30%.
Это значит, что даже самая крутая нейронка будет косячить в каждом третьем грибе.
В основном это безобидные ошибки, но иногда нейронки путают сыроежки и бледные поганки, а это уже смертельно.
На самом деле, р…
В середине 19-го века была очень популярна спиритическая фотография — можно было сфотографироваться с призраками!
Секрет довольно прост. На одну и ту же фотопластинку (аналог пленки из 19 века) делали два снимка: сначала с одними людьми, а потом с другими.
В итоге фотографии как бы накладывались друг на друга, и люди с первого снимка получались бледными и полупрозрачными — будто призраки.
Но в свое время такие изо…
⚡️НОВЫЙ ВИД КОШАЧЬИХ⚡️
Ученые нашли в Боливии ранее неизвестный вид дикой кошки. Впервые за 100 лет семейство кошачьих получило обновление!
Вид назвали Leopardus tilcayo. Ученые нашли его в приюте для диких животных, куда тилкайо отнес местный житель, который подобрал его котенком, приняв за домашнюю кошку.
Тилкайо покрыт леопардовыми пятнами, по размеру меньше домашней кошки.
Прямо сейчас готовим для вас новый выпуск о самых необычных состояниях вещества.
Отсняли его в конце августа, со зрелищными экспериментами и долгожданной темой космоса. И вот, сегодня рекомендации подкидывают свежее видео на канале «Космос Просто» – и там тоже обсуждают состояния вещества!
Что ж, если очень долго тянуть с подготовкой темы, кто-то другой обязательно успеет о ней рассказать 🙈
Мы продолжим монтироват…
Принесли вам недавние фотографии барханного кота — это один из самых неуловимых видов диких кошек в природе. Они живут в пустынных местах и почти не выходят из нор днем.
Размером эти ребята с домашнюю кошку! А на фото вообще котенок.
Разбираем человека на кусочки, чтобы лучше узнать строение тела!
К счастью, теперь это можно сделать безопасно онлайн. Разработчица, используя GPT-6 Astra, создала сайт, который разбирает мужскую анатомическую модель на 2234 фрагмента. Каждая мышца, кость или сосуд со своим описанием.
Увлеченно следим, чему еще научилась GPT-6 Astra за последнюю неделю.
То мультфильм заанимирует, то игру создаст, то математические задачи решит. У нас один вопрос: «Ну а нам-то что?! Как это улучшит нашу жизнь?»
Чтобы разобраться, записали четверых из нашей команды на онлайн-кэмп, который буквально так и называется — Курс по AI-агентам и личной эффективности.
Стартует 28 сентября и продлится 4 недели, а ведет его…
На этой фотографии бабочка данаида монарх в крохотном рюкзаке!
Ученые придумали такие рюкзаки, чтобы отслеживать перемещение этих бабочек, которые находятся под угрозой исчезновения. Геоданные передаются с помощью радиоволн, а само устройство работает на солнечной батарейке.
Настала пора ответить на важный вопрос: ВЫЖИЛА ЛИ БУРМАЛДА 2?
Велика фантазия наших подписчиков...
Бурмалда младшая ВЫЖИЛА! Подписчики ютуб-сообщества в этот раз не знали, какое именно существо вы приготовили, так что все, как и в природе, решал рандом. Катаклизм, который Бурмалда 2 пережила — три года без Солнца! Пепел поднялся в небо и помешал фотосинтезу.
Но благодаря вашему выбору, бурмалда питалась падалью и …
❤2,050🔥74🐳35🕊9⚡6🎃6👻6
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @toplesofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@toplesofficial edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Йоп, Ян Топлес @yantoples_official · 98,863 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,701 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
ХОРОШИЕ НОВОСТИ @goodnews_goodtimes · 46,634 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
SlivkiShow - Official @slivkishow_youtube · 79,122 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
Редакция.Наука @redakciya_nauka · 31,883 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Scammers @scamsociety · 364,825 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Naked Science @nsmag · 191,976 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Dagon @dagon_official · 25,781 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Vert Dider @vertdider · 26,948 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
BIOMACHINE @bmchn · 175,924 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
QWERTY @qwerty_live · 21,603 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
амоБлог @amoblog · 31,020 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Альберт @robiyolo · 48,232 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Dzari @DrDzari · 267,375 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Мудреныч @moodrenych · 25,523 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Thoisoi @TheThoisoi · 45,321 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
chad @chadgpt_ru · 138,289 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Marmok_yt @marmok_yt · 477,594 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Очевидные вещи @ochewid · 55,316 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
MyGap @MyGapTelegram · 89,029 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
Utopia Show @topapopa · 368,504 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,220 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
ЧД @che_d_e · 37,585 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Айбелив Айкенфлаев @ibelieveicanf · 39,024 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 144 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
6 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Ян Топлес(uk.wikipedia.org) “…(Росію) і борються за нашу спільну перемогу»{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/toplesofficial/7601 |title=Пост в Telegram}}{{Cite web |url=https://www…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТОПЛЕС” (@toplesofficial), 511,065 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toplesofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.