Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “📚 книжное братство” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 59 days, net -1,247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162,769–164,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 05:38
162,956
-200
25 Sept 2026, 13:18
163,156
-156
19 Sept 2026, 03:41
163,312
-25
16 Sept 2026, 17:18
163,337
-49
14 Sept 2026, 18:38
163,386
-31
13 Sept 2026, 06:36
163,417
-18
11 Sept 2026, 08:36
163,435
-43
8 Sept 2026, 14:22
163,478
-83
5 Sept 2026, 04:37
163,561
-45
3 Sept 2026, 06:59
163,606
-34
2 Sept 2026, 02:36
163,640
-26
1 Sept 2026, 03:38
163,666
-42
31 Aug 2026, 04:08
163,708
-26
30 Aug 2026, 07:35
163,734
-22
29 Aug 2026, 07:34
163,756
-27
28 Aug 2026, 04:58
163,783
-20
27 Aug 2026, 04:49
163,803
-22
26 Aug 2026, 05:04
163,825
-67
25 Aug 2026, 05:54
163,892
-17
24 Aug 2026, 06:06
163,909
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.68%
avg views ÷ 162,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.679%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
44 (20 June 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
169,770
Reactions total
1,152
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 10:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈439
Videos
≈1
Links
≈1,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,106 reactions across 44 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
1,635
52.6%
💯
809
26.0%
🕊
332
10.7%
😢
264
8.50%
💩
36
1.16%
🎃
30
0.966%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 44 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @flibusta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В конце ноября, в оттепель, часов в девять утра, поезд Петербургско-Варшавской железной дороги на всех парах подходил к Петербургу. Было так сыро и туманно, что насилу рассвело...Из пассажиров были и возвращавшиеся из-за границы...
Федор Достоевский "Идиот"47%
Лев Толстой "Анна Каренина"48%
Николай Гоголь "Мертвые души"6%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Во всяком случае нужна решительность. Ежели, несмотря на все эти выгодные условия, вам нехорошо там, где вы живете, постарайтесь устроить лучше. Поезжайте за границу, выдьте замуж, подите в монастырь, заройтесь в деревню, но не будьте ни секунды в нерешительности. Это самое тяжелое и даже вредное состояние».
Из письма Льва Николаевича Толстого Валерии Арсеньевой от 6 декабря 1857 года.
"А что касается честности - да, она гигиены требует, ничего странного. Как зубы, скажем. Иначе - разрушается помаленьку и болит, ноет…"
Георгий Полонский, повесть "Доживём до понедельника", 1970 год.
"Успех – это признание, подтверждение твоих возможностей и прав в искусстве, но не индульгенция от ошибок и провалов. Даже увенчанный однажды лавровым венком не может всегда и всюду таскать его за собой, потому что, знаешь ведь, лавровые листики в суп идут, и можно весь лавровый венок в бульоне сварить."
Евгений Леонов, "Письма сыну",1992 год
«Зло неистребимо. Никакой человек не способен уменьшить его количество в мире. Он может несколько улучшить свою собственную судьбу, но всегда за счет ухудшения судьбы других. И всегда будут короли, более или менее жестокие, бароны, более или менее дикие, и всегда будет невежественный народ, питающий восхищение к своим угнетателям и ненависть к своему освободителю. И все потому, что раб гораздо лучше понимает своего г…
«Когда ребёнок впервые узнает цену взрослым — когда серьёзный малыш впервые догадывается, что взрослые не наделены божественной проницательностью, что далеко не всегда суждения их мудры, мысли верны, а приговоры справедливы, — всё в нём переворачивается от ужаса и отчаяния. Боги низвергаются с пьедесталов, и не остается уверенности ни в чём.»
Джон Стейнбек. "К востоку от Эдема"
❤🔥143💯74🕊9🎃7
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @flibusta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 27 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В конце ноября, в оттепель, часов в девять утра, поезд Петербургско-Варшавской железной дороги на всех парах подходил к Петербургу. Было так сыро и туманно, что насилу рассвело...Из пассажиров были и возвращавшиеся из-за границы...
Федор Достоевский "Идиот"47%
Лев Толстой "Анна Каренина"48%
Николай Гоголь "Мертвые души"6%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какую теорию пытается проверить Раскольников в романе Ф.М. Достоевского «Преступление и наказание»?
Теорию «разумного эгоизма»19%
Теорию «права сильной личности»78%
Теорию исторического прогресса3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Уютная Библиотека @knijky · 21,955 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
Книги Флибуста 📕 Аудиокниги @flibustabooks · 152,864 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
Книжный Вестник @duosoft_books · 119,437 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Аудиокниги @AUDIOKNIGI_CHANNEL · 256,254 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Книги и Аудиокниги | Флибуста @skachat_chitat_besplatno · 89,871 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Классические книги @freeclassicbooks · 111,138 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Must Read | Что почитать @YourMustRead · 25,717 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Книжный Клуб | Литература @GoBooks · 19,929 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
Писатель и его рассказы @Pisatel_rasskazy · 88,907 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
Книжная полка маркетолога @Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,222 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Книги | Аудиокниги @flibusta_anglysky · 368,586 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Английский язык 🇬🇧 @dailyeng · 73,161 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Сила Книги | Аудиокниги | Flibusta @silaknigi · 122,637 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Книги на миллион | бизнес блог @ikniga · 836,679 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Словарный запас | Саморазвитие @slovar_psikhologia · 83,556 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Психология саморазвития @SilaSlov · 118,281 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Мое Образование @moe_obrazovanie · 227,955 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Художник, рисуй! | Digital Art образование @simpleartist · 58,880 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Психология @PsyEducation · 59,182 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжное братство” (@flibusta), 162,956 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flibusta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.