Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON 🚀 | Activities

Channel

TON 🚀 | Activities

@actonton

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

124,078subscribers

-20,754 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002272370488
TypeChannel
Username@actonton
DescriptionДелюсь интересными новостями и своими активностями в сети TON. Не даю инвестиционные советы и ни к чему не призываю. Строго DYOR. Чат: @activitiesonton Связь: @snake0ne Хорошие юзернеймы для вас: @topuserka
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/actonton

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

85.2 average views per post against 124,078 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.069%. Across the 2,371 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–315,465 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.38% and 20.3%, with a median of 9.93%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 September 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Posts measured70 of 70 published in the window (70 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled5,963
Mature posts only0.069% over 69 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers124,078 measured 27 October 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,371 channels · p10 2.05% · p25 4.38% · p50 9.93% · p75 20.3% · p90 33.0%
Position in cohort0.253th percentile · 1/143 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.233% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 27 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

124,078144,832134,4557 August 2026 — 144,832 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144,760 subscribers9 August 2026 — 144,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 144,069 subscribers11 August 2026 — 143,821 subscribers12 August 2026 — 143,445 subscribers13 August 2026 — 143,206 subscribers14 August 2026 — 142,972 subscribers15 August 2026 — 142,514 subscribers17 August 2026 — 142,147 subscribers18 August 2026 — 141,765 subscribers19 August 2026 — 141,469 subscribers20 August 2026 — 141,308 subscribers21 August 2026 — 140,999 subscribers22 August 2026 — 140,599 subscribers24 August 2026 — 139,961 subscribers25 August 2026 — 139,648 subscribers26 August 2026 — 139,388 subscribers27 August 2026 — 139,270 subscribers28 August 2026 — 138,954 subscribers30 August 2026 — 138,592 subscribers30 August 2026 — 138,355 subscribers31 August 2026 — 138,125 subscribers1 September 2026 — 137,751 subscribers2 September 2026 — 137,379 subscribers4 September 2026 — 137,031 subscribers7 September 2026 — 136,366 subscribers10 September 2026 — 135,485 subscribers12 September 2026 — 135,087 subscribers14 September 2026 — 134,509 subscribers15 September 2026 — 134,074 subscribers17 September 2026 — 133,456 subscribers28 September 2026 — 131,080 subscribers5 October 2026 — 129,479 subscribers9 October 2026 — 128,209 subscribers13 October 2026 — 127,311 subscribers14 October 2026 — 126,977 subscribers16 October 2026 — 126,785 subscribers17 October 2026 — 126,494 subscribers18 October 2026 — 126,299 subscribers19 October 2026 — 126,038 subscribers20 October 2026 — 125,758 subscribers21 October 2026 — 125,462 subscribers22 October 2026 — 125,174 subscribers23 October 2026 — 124,947 subscribers24 October 2026 — 124,611 subscribers25 October 2026 — 124,506 subscribers26 October 2026 — 124,301 subscribers27 October 2026 — 124,078 subscribers7 August 202627 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 81 days, net -20,754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120,965–147,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 21:16124,078-223
26 Oct 2026, 22:25124,301-205
25 Oct 2026, 19:47124,506-105
24 Oct 2026, 17:08124,611-336
23 Oct 2026, 16:19124,947-227
22 Oct 2026, 14:34125,174-288
21 Oct 2026, 07:17125,462-296
20 Oct 2026, 06:36125,758-280
19 Oct 2026, 03:31126,038-261
18 Oct 2026, 00:58126,299-195
17 Oct 2026, 02:01126,494-291
16 Oct 2026, 01:37126,785-192
14 Oct 2026, 23:21126,977-334
13 Oct 2026, 13:36127,311-898
9 Oct 2026, 13:37128,209-1,270
5 Oct 2026, 03:41129,479-1,601
28 Sept 2026, 08:41131,080-2,376
17 Sept 2026, 19:18133,456-618
15 Sept 2026, 17:55134,074-435
14 Sept 2026, 04:15134,509first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.069%
avg views ÷ 124,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.7
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 70 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held132 (30 July 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total5,999
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Oct 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,270
Videos
≈192
Links
≈2,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 07s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 43 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4543.3%
🔥2221.2%
👍1413.5%
😁109.62%
👀32.88%
👎21.92%
👏21.92%
💯21.92%
🤝21.92%
🥰10.962%
🫡10.962%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 132 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @actonton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Oct 2026, 11:13 UTC39 viewsread 28 October 2026

Классный функционал: 💎 Предложения по подаркам прямо в чате Нажмите "Деньги" в любом чате, выберите один из представленных подарков и сделайте предложение в GRAM. Они могут принять или отклонить его одним касанием. Ваши GRAM безопасно хранятся и будут возвращены, если предложение будет отклонено, или если пройдет 24 часа.

25 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC83 viewsread 28 October 2026

Почему телеграм решил выкатить ленту рекомендаций? Ответ здесь Метрики падают. Как ни крути, а блокировки дают о себе знать 🤔

25 Oct 2026, 13:25 UTC82 viewsread 28 October 2026

Ждём ленту рекомендаций в следующей обнове телеги Полноценное превращение в социальную сеть не за горами 😭

23 Oct 2026, 12:42 UTC68 viewsread 28 October 2026

Будет интересно, если оплата будет в грамах 💎

23 Oct 2026, 12:42 UTC85 viewsread 28 October 2026
Forwarded from @thedailytonrusVideo

🍌 JUST IN: Как будет выглядеть встроенный AI-агент в Telegram Пользователи смогут подключить стороннего AI-провайдера — например, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok или OpenRouter — через API-ключ и общаться с моделью в отдельном диалоге с @agent. Пока функция скрыта в beta-версии Telegram для macOS и недоступна по умолчанию. В демонстрации используются тестовые данные, а сам принцип работы к релизу ещё может измениться. @thed…

21 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

И самое прикольное, подпись к подарку, который ещё не пробовал в блокчейне можно удалить за 1 ⭐️

🔥2

21 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC87 viewsread 28 October 2026
Photo

Открыли возможность переноса подарков из профиля сразу в кошелёк телеграма 👍 Теперь можно сделать свой кошелёк максимально клоунским. Фон можно менять только с подарками Plush Pepe и Resistance Dog, увы, только для мажоров функция 😬

20 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC87 viewsread 28 October 2026
Photo

Про самое главное чуть не забыли, теперь можно создавать ботов с припиской _gay. Очень важное нововведение! 🤔

20 Oct 2026, 18:18 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

Ура, мтонга! В сегодняшнем обновлении добавили возможность клеить подарки на свой кошелёк. Вот теперь заживём 💪

❤3

20 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC89 viewsread 28 October 2026
Video

В Walt добавили возможность подключения ии-агента к кошельку, чтоб он помог вам эффективнее и быстрее потерять все оставшиеся деньги 😬 Прикольная функция, на самом деле

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @actonton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@actonton edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 October 2026
Most recent edit
12 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Какой дизайн гем?

  1. 🎁61%
  2. 🎁35%
  3. 🎁23%
  4. 🎁23%

The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON 🚀 | Activities” (@actonton), 124,078 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actonton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.