Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Брендинг На Грани

Channel

Брендинг На Грани

@BrendingNaGrani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,689subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187915070
TypeChannel
Username@BrendingNaGrani
DescriptionДля ценителей названий и лого на грани) Мы в ВК: https://vk.com/brendingnagrani Мы на Пикабу: https://pikabu.ru/@logotipper Мы на Дзене: https://dzen.ru/id/5dc1a1b7bd639600b3665039
Created25 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BrendingNaGrani

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,6899,7519,7206 August 2026 — 9,720 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,726 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,731 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,743 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,741 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,731 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,732 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,735 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,751 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,746 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,751 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,743 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,741 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,742 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,748 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,742 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,727 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,721 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,729 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,730 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,719 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,705 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,700 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,694 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,689 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,680–9,760 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:369,689-5
2 Nov 2026, 07:169,694-6
29 Oct 2026, 22:479,700-5
27 Oct 2026, 04:269,705-14
23 Oct 2026, 19:379,719-11
20 Oct 2026, 23:559,730+1
18 Oct 2026, 02:219,729+8
15 Oct 2026, 09:589,721-6
12 Oct 2026, 18:119,727-15
5 Oct 2026, 21:389,742-6
28 Sept 2026, 08:569,748+6
18 Sept 2026, 14:589,742+1
14 Sept 2026, 02:019,741-2
10 Sept 2026, 02:009,743-8
4 Sept 2026, 17:019,751+5
31 Aug 2026, 16:239,746-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:379,751+16
25 Aug 2026, 18:289,735+3
23 Aug 2026, 04:029,732+1
20 Aug 2026, 02:239,731first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 9,689 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held37 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total9,100
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,450
Videos
≈35
Links
≈204

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,083 reactions across 33 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥40036.9%
👍22721.0%
😁22420.7%
👏11510.6%
❤958.77%
🥰100.923%
😢50.462%
👎30.277%
😱20.185%
🤯20.185%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC708 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Новая подборка отменных названий и слоганов из рубрики Нейминг-Шмейминг) #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #юмор #каламбур #играслов #креатив #бренды #слоган #логотип

🔥13👍8👏4❤2😁2

4 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC807 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Отменный Нейминг-Шмейминг для технологической компании) Кстати, для этого бренда помимо названия мы также разработали логотип и фирменный стиль) #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #логотип #юмор #дизайн #слоган #каламбур #играслов #маркировка

🔥10👍7👏4❤1

3 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC997 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Встречайте новую подборку отменных названий и слоганов из рубрики Нейминг-Шмейминг) #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #юмор #каламбур #играслов #креатив #бренды #слоган #логотип

👍15👏7❤5🔥5

2 Nov 2026, 08:51 UTC968 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Отменный Нейминг-Шмейминг для киностудии) #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #логотип #юмор #дизайн #слоган #каламбур #играслов #хоррор #киностудия

👍14😁6🔥5👏3❤1🥰1

1 Nov 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

На какой канал подпишемся?) #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #логотип #юмор #дизайн #каламбур #играслов

🔥5👍3👏2

30 Oct 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @Logotipper_Agency

Posted without readable text

30 Oct 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,310 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @Logotipper_AgencyPhoto

Ко Дню работника рекламы «Сбер» организовал совместную наружную кампанию с зелёными брендами «Сбер» пригласил торговые сети «Азбука вкуса» и «ВкусВилл», аптечную сеть «Ригла», стриминговый сервис «Звук», сервис поиска и бронирования отелей «Отелло», сервис поиска недвижимости «Домклик» и РБК. Идея кампании: общий цвет — не повод конкурировать, а возможность поддержать друг друга. Она продолжает идею «Быть зелёным —…

😁14👍5🔥2👏1😢1

29 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,030 views69 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @Logotipper_AgencyPhoto

В честь приближающегося Хэллоуина составили подборку наших тематических маскарадных нарядов для известных брендов) Собрали здесь новое и лучшее) За идею для Додо спасибо @ilya_stallone #Logotipper #логотип #юмор #Хэллоуин #бренды

🔥41👍16❤8👏2😁2

28 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC585 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Logotipper_AgencyPhoto

Наверное, уже почти все слышали историю про кофейню LOVE, которую из-за нового закона пришлось экстренно переименовывать в Олега... Если нет, то вкратце было так: кофейня LOVE из Златоуста после новых требований к русскоязычным вывескам решила не заказывать дорогой новый логотип, а просто переставила и перевернула буквы старой вывески — так LOVE превратился в «ОЛЕГ». Находчивый ребрендинг завирусился и привлёк огромн…

😁27👏17🔥13❤3👍1

27 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC930 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

26 августа отмечался День благодарности собаке. В честь этого мы собрали подборку наших добрых и оригинальных собачьих брендов из рубрики «Нейминг-Шмейминг») #НеймингШмейминг #нейминг #логотип #юмор #каламбур #играслов #дизайн #собаки

🔥22❤6👍6🥰2👏1😁1

26 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,480 views75 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас к импортозамещению добавилась и повальная кириллизация и локализация названий и логотипов брендов. А ещё недавно был Международный день странной музыки) В честь всего этого мы собрали большую подборку наших концептов по «русификации» известных иностранных групп и исполнителей. #русификация #дизайн #юмор #кириллизация #логотип #креатив #Logotipper_импортозамещение #нейминг

🔥38😁30❤3👍3👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @BrendingNaGrani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll171 voters

Выбираем активности по душе:

  1. Волейбол43%
  2. Тренажёры23%
  3. Бег16%
  4. Йога18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Yan_Dilan
@yan_dilan · 77,629
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
BspChannel
@BSPhistorychannel · 23,415
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
Ёрш
@loginoversh · 62,727
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Tech Debunker
@tech_debunker · 24,326
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Мем в глаз попал
@memineye · 19,791
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
Печатные выражения
@pechat_sallyks · 26,351
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Брендинг На Грани” (@BrendingNaGrani), 9,689 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BrendingNaGrani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.