Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for commit -m "better"

Channel

commit -m "better"

@itpgchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,714subscribers

+115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567842955
TypeChannel
Username@itpgchannel
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/itpgchannel

Growth

3,5983,7143,6566 August 2026 — 3,599 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,598 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,601 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,606 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,618 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,631 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,638 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,656 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,685 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,714 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,581–3,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 00:393,714+29
1 Sept 2026, 13:253,685+5
29 Aug 2026, 14:163,680+24
26 Aug 2026, 10:233,656+18
23 Aug 2026, 09:133,638+7
19 Aug 2026, 16:463,631+13
16 Aug 2026, 19:463,618+12
12 Aug 2026, 22:153,606+5
9 Aug 2026, 21:523,601+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:263,598-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:213,599first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,374 reactions across 23 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁39128.5%
🔥37026.9%
🤡1359.83%
1319.53%
👍1027.42%
💩775.60%
🐳392.84%
🤣372.69%
💯181.31%
🎉161.16%
👏141.02%
💊100.728%
🆒50.364%
🤩50.364%
😇40.291%
👎30.218%
😱30.218%
🤔30.218%
👾20.146%
😐20.146%
7 further kinds70.509%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,636 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC718 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

причем я сам попросил - лень идти за totp

👏4🤡3🐳2🔥1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC943 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О, и антропики до этого догадались!

🔥24🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC972 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#perf - это состояние души. Например, когда github actions тебе дает 20 джобов по 4 ядра на Linux, и 5 джобов по 3 ядра на macos, то ты делаешь так, чтобы эта халява никогда не простаивала! Хорошо иметь свою систему сборки https://t.me/itpgchannel/4282, в условном meson/cmake хрен бы так легко попилил свой CI.

💯10🔥7🤡7👾21

7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,150 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://github.com/pg83/shitty/releases TL;DR - новый релиз #shitty: * sixels * табы preview, пока без UI вкладок, только возможность создавать и переключаться между ними с клавиатуры

8🔥5😱3👍2🤡1🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,160 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#trustme Получилось порядка 17к тестов (на КДПВ 10к нод, иногда нода больше одного теста). На старте trustme (бывший #mrustc) проходил только 2/3 из них, сейчас, после суток пыхтения, и фикса порядка 150 (!!!) багов, проходит уже 3/4. И это я еще не прогнал его с санитайзерами на полном корпусе тестов. В целом, не умаляя заслуг его автора (а он проделал титанический труд), это довольно много говорит о качестве кода

15🔥8👍2🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC≈1,510 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы запустить autoresearch для #trustme, нужен очень плотный корпус тестов, с целевой метрикой "сократи количество fail". В https://t.me/itpgchannel/4296 писал, как я "ограбил опенсорс", чтобы соорудить свой монструозный корпус тестов для #shitty. Прямо сейчас снова граблю опенсорс, на этот раз тащу к себе самые разнообразные тесты на компилятор rust! https://github.com/pg83/trustme/blob/master/PLAN.md - вот пла

🔥23😁17👍8🤡52👀1

6 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,560 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=66036 TL;DR - Rust запретили AI в разработке. Запретили и запретили, долбоебы и долбоебы, кто бы сомневался. Но у меня под это дело как раз есть анонс нового проекта! Думаю, вы заметили, что мне нравятся всякие autoresearch #LLM штуки, типа моего #shitty, это когда я краду 5000 тестов на терминал в opensource, а потом говорю клоде "повтори"! https://t.me/itpgchannel/42

🤡29🔥25😁157👍4🐳31🆒1

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,610 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вот и шелл для #shitty подоспел!

😁40🔥11🤩42💯1

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tech_b0lt_Genona

Четверг, а значит время проектов от подписчиков! 🌝 Тем, кто пропустил, что такое четверговые проекты от подписчиков, можно прочитать тут - https://t.me/tech_b0lt_Genona/4983 Слово автору @sowound --- Зачастую у софта практически нет никакого UX. Если в скрипте ошибка, то желаю тебе удачи в попытках понять, откуда она вообще взялась. Для Windows буквально нет ни одной bash-совместимой оболочки, а powershell — это

😁27💩10👍7🤔31

5 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,690 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выпустил новый релиз #shitty - https://github.com/pg83/shitty/releases! Всякие мелочи: * лигатуры и поддержка всратых Nerd иконок * toml config * произвольные переопределения кейбиндов * 1200 цветовых тем, цельнотянутых из iterm, #kitty, #alacritty, и везде, где нашел * фиксы и оптимизации Но самое важное в этом релизе, что я таки пошел на поводу у тех, кому не нравится название #shitty! Теперь в репозитории живу

😁5519🤡9🔥8👍7💩6🐳3💯3

4 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,610 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @seeallochnayaPhoto

Число сообщений о серьезных киберуязвимостях продолжает расти. В июле 21 крупная технологическая организация опубликовала около 2500 CVE высокой и критической степени серьезности — примерно в 5 раз больше, чем ежемесячный рекорд до анонса Claude Mythos Preview. Источник

🤡12👍8🔥42🤩1

4 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,740 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Публикация на opennet порадовала меня уж лишь тем, как там корежило копилефтоблядей #GNU, любо-дорого!

😁31🤡196💊5🔥3👍2😐2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @itpgchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

addmeto
@addmeto · 71,899
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“commit -m "better"” (@itpgchannel), 3,714 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itpgchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.