Channel
@r_chp
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,194subscribers
+117 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001322232529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r_chp |
| Description | Мы публикуем только то, что интересно нам — создателям этого паблика. У нас тут своя атмосфера. Обратная связь (прислать видео, ссылку, отклоняют заявку в чат): @ru_chp_obratka_bot Помочь можно тут: (Сбер) 2202 2080 3480 7587 |
| Created | 31 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r_chp |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “РУ_ЧП” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 31,194 | -30 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 31,224 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 31,210 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 31,206 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 31,210 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 31,208 | +16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 31,192 | +72 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 31,120 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 31,116 | +16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 31,100 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 31,079 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 31,075 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 31,078 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 31,083 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 31,077 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 31,077 | first reading |
207 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 207 (4 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,035,280 |
| Reactions total | 39,232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 177 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36,120 reactions across 190 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 6,141 | 17.0% | |
| 🏆 | 4,301 | 11.9% | |
| 🤣 | 3,129 | 8.66% | |
| 😁 | 2,867 | 7.94% | |
| 😱 | 2,128 | 5.89% | |
| custom 5251301176737013980 | 1,771 | 4.90% | |
| custom 5447544503143504937 | 1,633 | 4.52% | |
| 👏 | 1,290 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5373112999076699207 | 1,237 | 3.42% | |
| 🔥 | 1,168 | 3.23% | |
| 👀 | 1,113 | 3.08% | |
| 😢 | 935 | 2.59% | |
| 🤯 | 743 | 2.06% | |
| 🤪 | 671 | 1.86% | |
| 🦄 | 629 | 1.74% | |
| 🐳 | 575 | 1.59% | |
| 🌚 | 509 | 1.41% | |
| 👍 | 508 | 1.41% | |
| custom 5375135722514685501 | 495 | 1.37% | |
| 🍾 | 447 | 1.24% | |
| 34 further kinds | 3,830 | 10.6% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 207 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 207 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ночное... Сегодня во всех СМИ первое видео про то как робот впервые превзошел мировой рекорд Усэйна Болта в беге на 100 метров. Машина развила максимальную скорость до 12,66 м/с, лучший показатель Болта составляет 12,42 м/с. Но почему не показали остальных претендентов? #китай_как_всегда
😁102custom 537513572251468550118🤣14⚡7custom 53529643368285659934🏆3❤1👀1
Понял только, что водитель "Теслы" погиб. Я устал, я запутался. Вечер уже. Я смотрю в перевод с вьетнамского как баран в новые ворота. Почувствуйте себя админом, распедальте аудитории, что тут произошло. Где тут, сука, внедорожник? Кто, блядь, Линь, кто Цзянь, кто Ли? Почему потом на трезвость проверяют госпожу Лам? Психбольница, ёпт. Три человека погибли в результате ДТП на шоссе В то время как двое людей пытал…
🤯57👀17🤔10🤷♂7🤪5😢4custom 52513011767370139804❤2
"Уход от мотобата" Так называется файл с видео, размещенный в одном из чатов Йошкар-Олы. С воротами мужик на стоянке не доработал, конечно. За ссылку спасибо читателю Транзистор. #мотоциклисты, #погони, #Йошкар_Ола, #господа_полицейские, #надо_было_бить
🤬89custom 525130117673701398048🫡9❤4🦄4👏3🔥3💯1
Сисярит такой "Автодор" тут выложил очередное. Сообщают, что профессионала лишили прав на полгода + штраф. #встречный_поток_это_какой, #ничего_себе_какой_он_плохой, #профессиональное, #противоречит_объяснимому
🤬95🤪41🤯23😎9custom 52513011767370139806custom 53751357225146855015👀3❤2
Возможно это самое необычное кино про байкеров, которое вы видели... Красноярский край. Так-то автор все по делу говорит. #берегите_животных, #мотоциклисты, #все_правильно_сделал, #природа_очень_даже, #пвп_или_зассал, #спасибо_Руслану
💯188❤20✍8🤷♂6🐳4custom 53751357225146855014👍3🎄1
Дама с собачкой Снято вот только что в Ленобласти. Спасибо за видео Роману, это его приятель снял, ему ссылку скинут. #авторское_видео, #красный_же, #увернулся_сцукован, #берегите_животных
custom 537311299907669920790🙈37🤬25👀5👻4❤1🦄1😁1
Ловили мужики горбушу, а поймали вот это вот... Снято на днях в Усть-Камчатске. Ученые подтверждают, что из-за аномальной жары косяки тунца дошли до берегов Камчатки. Теперь их не только во Владивостоке и на Сахалине ловят, но и там. #рыбаки
🐳77🔥28😱14👍7custom 52513011767370139803👀1🤬1
"Фура — дура, штык — молодец" (с) Суворов А.В. Симферопольское шоссе у Подольска. #профессиональное, #кирпичи, #это_он_зачем_так_сделал, #дтп
🏆76custom 544754450314350493736🤬16😁14👻4😎4❤2👀2
Тормозят только слабаки Вчера днем в Новосибирске. Семнадцатилетний мотоциклист в больнице, его пассажир удрал. За рулем Toyota Yaris находилась 71-летняя женщина. #Новосибирск, #мотоциклисты, #у_меня_хрен_проскочишь, #женщина_за_рулем, #дтп
🏆53custom 537513572251468550131😢10custom 53731129990766992079😁8👏4🗿2🤬2
Обидчивый какой! "Водитель "Шевроле" обиделся на водителя автобуса, который, по его мнению, его подрезал. Дальше молотком разбил зеркало и уехал", - пишет наш читатель Евгений (спасибо ему за видео!). Снято вчера вечером в Красногорске. #авторское_видео, #Красногорск, #общественный_транспорт, #скрылся_с_места_дтп
custom 5251301176737013980120🤬39🦄10🤪8☃3🌚2👏2custom 53731129990766992072
Пятничный репортаж про леопардессу и ее прайд обчекрыженных львов Снято сегодня во Владивостоке. Исключительно со звуком! #Владивосток, #синька_и_норкоманы, #драка, #отдыхать_нужно_красиво, #все_хороши, #воины_синего_легиона, #региональный_репортаж
🤣151custom 537311299907669920776🏆28👍9😱5🤩4custom 54475445031435049374🔥3
Гаучо на траверсе Тихуана (Мексика), 18 августа. О состоянии пострадавших ничего не сообщается. #что_то_пошло_не_так, #мотоциклисты, #берегите_животных, #дтп
🦄77😁20👻14🌚7custom 53731129990766992077😢6👀4🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @r_chp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@r_chp edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 26,584 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RU_CHP” (@r_chp), 31,194 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_chp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.