Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SaaS по Понятиям

Channel

SaaS по Понятиям

@saasstuff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,954subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001870404415
TypeChannel
Username@saasstuff
DescriptionКанал SaaS фаундера и автора Венчура по Понятиям (@ventureStuff) про SaaS бизнесы, GTM и как зарабатывать деньги в SaaS. Гайд по Go-to-market для фаундеров: https://almas.vc/gtm
Created13 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/saasstuff

Growth

8,9428,9618,951.56 August 2026 — 8,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,946 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,954 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,959 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,961 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,954 subscribers8,9546 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 13 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,939–8,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 08:038,954-7
16 Aug 2026, 08:038,961+2
12 Aug 2026, 10:268,959+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:518,954+8
6 Aug 2026, 15:558,946+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:528,942no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:088,942first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 8,954 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.784%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held27 (20 May 202619 August 2026)
Views total44,300
Reactions total313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
130
Videos
21
Links
120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 40s
Average length
2m 08s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

985 reactions across 24 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29930.4%
😁25125.5%
👍16316.5%
🔥14314.5%
❤‍🔥323.25%
💯292.94%
🤣272.74%
👏131.32%
🤬80.812%
🥴40.406%
🦄30.305%
🐳20.203%
💊20.203%
😍20.203%
🫡20.203%
👻10.102%
💋10.102%
🗿10.102%
😱10.102%
🤯10.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,018reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 27 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saasstuff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,090 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT Ads Народ, вы не представляете как я жду активации ChatGPT ads для Кипра, чтобы мог наконец зарегать как белый человек и лить рекламку Кто-нить уже лил ?

🔥13🤬72

18 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC≈2,470 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Почему я не люблю холодный outreach в Телеге Потому что скамье

😁33🔥3💯21

17 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC≈2,570 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Пора заняться FB-кабинетом В 2019 году я крутил рекламу на приложение про "эротические аудио истории для женщин". Тогда это направление взлетало. Но был один креатив, в котором была 2д иллюстрация и кажется (.)(.) проскочил как кружок с радиусом в 3 пикселя (еще раз графика была примерно как в клипе Мумий Тролля "Невеста"). За это был бан аккаунта И вот 7 лет у меня заблочен кабинет, приходилось через других регат

😁5👍42👻1

14 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,210 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Как достать трафик на свой пет-проект в Telegram или ТГ-канал? Чат, сразу к делу: POV телеграм-блогера вокруг продукт-менеджмента/вайбкодинга/стартапов/бизнеса: -> рекламная выручка от 300К до 1М+ руб в мес POV темщика с ТГ ботом: -> выручка до $1M в мес, большинство вокруг 1000-500К руб в мес Что за темы по ботам в целом: • ИИ помощники (Hermes/Openclaw assistants) • ИИ генераторы (типа генерация видосиков че

7🔥5👍2🤣2

13 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,360 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Дядьки, кто grok 4.6 тестил уже? говорят на уровне с fable

  1. Я не тестил52%
  2. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код и читает код. Грок 4.6 топ4%
  3. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код. Грок 4.6 средне/плохо3%
  4. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и не понравилось, до fable не тащит2%
  5. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и классно выдает3%
  6. Просто посмотрю результат37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈4,940 views29 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Какая стадия своих начинаний?

  1. Работаю работу25%
  2. Хочу свой проект, нет идеи16%
  3. Есть идея но не знаю с чего начать7%
  4. Уже запустил, не пойму правда где траф достать22%
  5. Запустил, знаю где траф но сил или бабок на него не8%
  6. Траф пошел но связка хуево конвертит или ее нет. Короче Юзеры в бабло не превращаются6%
  7. Пошли продажи но пока не сходится экономика3%
  8. Экономика сходится но хочется больше7%
  9. Я ничего из этого не умею, безработный и без планов но хочется результаты увидеть7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁17👏7🦄31🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,380 viewsread 22 August 2026

Как вы решаете проблему continuous development? Вот у меня в SaaS клиенты присылают фичереквесты со скриншотами и стал я по сути их копипастить в Клод Начинает заебывать Кто как решает проблему сбора фидбека, суммаризации дубликатов (два клиента одно и тоже просят но разными словами) и кнопка моего апрува на имплементацию?

4 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC≈5,140 views61 reactions3 Starsread 22 August 2026

Как СНГ солопренеру принимать платежи зарубежом В прошлый раз писал тут спрашивал про платежки у всех и оказалось, что это огромная боль и квест получить деньги. У многих есть непонимание схем, ролей и маршрутов денежек. Поэтому решил записать гайд с базой как это все в целом работает и что возможно. Готовил этот выпуск несколько дней. Многие спрашивали про экзотические кейсы - типа вьетнама - просто посмотрите вид

37👍21🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈4,620 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Cold Start Телеграм-проектов Я пробовал - ВП (взаимные продвижения) - Конференции - Посевы за бабки - Telegram Ads - YouTube самый масштабный - YouTube, но это огромный труд а вот быстро и не сильно напрягаясь - это Telegram ads Он подходит как для Телеграм-каналов, так и для телеграм-ботов, естественно, у которых монетизация есть, причем на моем опыте это самый дешевый траф, а также самый приятный с точки зрения

😁20👍104🥴3🫡2

29 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC≈5,080 views61 reactions2 Starsread 22 August 2026
Video

Платежки Готовлю видос Пишите в коментах вопросы

👍43🔥15🐳21

24 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈6,440 views33 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Мотивация стартовать на выходных Нет лучшей мотивации, чем сын маминой подруги! 😂 Надеюсь вдохновит и пару идей подкинет к подходу найти тему, быстро сделать, быстро проверить спрос и где искать первых юзеров. Доп. мысли после видео: - понимаю что в СНГ другая ценовая чувствительность - думаю над этим - делаю другой западный проект и уже первый клиент мне строчит фиче-реквесты - за день сделал 12 доработок по прод

❤‍🔥21😁8👍2👏2

16 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈7,080 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

GPT 5.6 SOL заруинил MRR вайбкодеру Чат есть такой чувак стримы в ютюбе ведет - Bridgemind. Стримит постоянно - просмотры норм набирает, вайбкодит "до миллиона долларов". И вот пишет что ему GPT 5.6 SOL ночью пока он спал в страйпе все подписки отменил на тысячи долларов. Внимание вопрос - что пошло не так? Я Gpt не юзаю кроме как для генерации картинок в YouTube.

😁33🔥42

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @saasstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Poll979 voters

Дядьки, кто grok 4.6 тестил уже? говорят на уровне с fable

  1. Я не тестил52%
  2. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код и читает код. Грок 4.6 топ4%
  3. Я - крутой инженер который шарит за код. Грок 4.6 средне/плохо3%
  4. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и не понравилось, до fable не тащит2%
  5. Я вайбкодер и код не читаю. Грок 4.6 тестил и классно выдает3%
  6. Просто посмотрю результат37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll985 voters

Какая стадия своих начинаний?

  1. Работаю работу25%
  2. Хочу свой проект, нет идеи16%
  3. Есть идея но не знаю с чего начать7%
  4. Уже запустил, не пойму правда где траф достать22%
  5. Запустил, знаю где траф но сил или бабок на него не8%
  6. Траф пошел но связка хуево конвертит или ее нет. Короче Юзеры в бабло не превращаются6%
  7. Пошли продажи но пока не сходится экономика3%
  8. Экономика сходится но хочется больше7%
  9. Я ничего из этого не умею, безработный и без планов но хочется результаты увидеть7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 168,451 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 58,910
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 80,150
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SaaS по Понятиям” (@saasstuff), 8,954 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saasstuff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.