Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps

Channel

Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps

@b_goncharenko

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,164subscribers

-446 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461436926
TypeChannel
Username@b_goncharenko
DescriptionПо рекламе и предложениям — @lllinook Обо мне https://bogdan.vision
Created19 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/b_goncharenko

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,16415,61015,3876 August 2026 — 15,610 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,602 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,595 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,590 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,585 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,584 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,578 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,576 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,573 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,560 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,554 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,550 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,548 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,543 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,538 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,524 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,525 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,521 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,509 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,503 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,501 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,496 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,485 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,476 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,469 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,448 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,422 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,415 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,414 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,400 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,395 subscribers30 September 2026 — 15,321 subscribers10 October 2026 — 15,306 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,295 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,292 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,294 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,281 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,275 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,274 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,270 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,268 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,266 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,258 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,248 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,244 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,237 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,239 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,234 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,219 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,213 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,199 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,193 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,184 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,179 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,177 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,168 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,167 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,164 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -446. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,097–15,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 10:1615,164-3
6 Nov 2026, 13:4415,167-1
5 Nov 2026, 10:2015,168-9
4 Nov 2026, 09:1815,177-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:5915,179-5
2 Nov 2026, 13:0015,184-9
1 Nov 2026, 12:5515,193-6
31 Oct 2026, 13:2815,199-14
30 Oct 2026, 10:0115,213-6
29 Oct 2026, 07:5915,219-15
28 Oct 2026, 03:4815,234-5
27 Oct 2026, 05:5815,239+2
26 Oct 2026, 02:2915,237-7
25 Oct 2026, 01:2015,244-4
24 Oct 2026, 04:3815,248-10
23 Oct 2026, 02:5815,258-8
22 Oct 2026, 01:0915,266-2
20 Oct 2026, 21:4515,268-2
19 Oct 2026, 20:1915,270-4
18 Oct 2026, 22:1815,274first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 15,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held46 (10 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total23,280
Reactions total452
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
718
Videos
142
Links
451

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,154 reactions across 44 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤76335.4%
😁50623.5%
💯1989.19%
👍1667.71%
🤣1346.22%
🔥1295.99%
👎632.92%
🥰311.44%
🎉291.35%
😢271.25%
🤬200.929%
👏170.789%
💅150.696%
🦄150.696%
😱140.65%
🏆110.511%
🤯60.279%
👌50.232%
🤔30.139%
🤩20.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 46 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @b_goncharenko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (27.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,160 views32 reactionsread 8 November 2026

DAST Слышал о таком? Буквально значит Dick And Swastika Test. Используется дизайнерами логотипов. Они проверяют, как будет вести себя лого, если его повернуть, перевернуть, отразить, что будет, если он будет на лифте или минивэне, где двери разъезжаются, проверяют негативное пространство, перспективу, быстрые вращения и другие искажения. Всё, чтобы логотип случайно не оказался похожим на нечто неприличное. Да, вир…

👍26💯2🔥2❤1🥰1

2 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC≈1,410 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Забрал звание лучшего портфолио месяца за октябрь Письмо пришло с утра, радостно. Вообще, за этот год портфолио попало в 5 или 6 подборок. Честно говоря, мне забавно наблюдать за всей этой историей, потому что портфолио я сделал год назад и это моё первое полноценное портфолио за шестнадцать лет карьеры. Да, у меня было когда-то портфолио на behance, были шоты на дриббл, но я не могу назвать это портфолио. Если че…

❤32🔥8

30 Oct 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,610 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Три шага до успеха Именно такую цифру называет каждый уважающий себя стейкхолдер. Оформить кредит за шаг, но отписаться от музыки за двадцать три. Окей, есть у бизнеса свой корыстный интерес, это понятно. Но, дело в том, что не каждый флоу нужно сокращать. Например, перевод денег. Открыть приложение, выбрать «переводы», выбрать адресата, ввести сумму, подтвердить перевод, отправить деньги. Звучит так, что можно и…

💯23👍2🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC≈1,990 views54 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Дизайн никому ничего не должен Налетайте) Да, мы двигаем пиксели, чтобы бизнес стриг веточки, чтобы пользователи хлопали в ладоши и мы с Мекрюковым могли радостно писать про висцеральный эффект. Но черт подери, все в погоне за функцией и содержанием стали забывать о процессе и форме. Неужели не хочется иногда сделать что-то просто крутое. Не отвечая на вопрос «зачем?», а чтобы сказать «потому что могу». В дизайне…

👍36😁7👎4🦄3❤1🔥1🤯1🥰1

27 Oct 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,990 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Руководитель или заказчик говорит: «Пора подключать AI-агентов». Вы смотрите ролики, что-то пробуете, уже примерно понимаете, как это работает. Но открываете свою задачу... и непонятно, с чего начать В такой момент полезнее увидеть весь процесс по шагам: что открыть, что настроить, какую задачу дать агенту и как проверить результат. 28 октября в 18:00 мск Даниил Шишко 😎, продуктовый дизайнер, пройдет этот путь в пр…

😁5❤3🤬1🤯1

23 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC≈2,310 views46 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Исследование продуктового дизайна DevCrowd проводят ежегодное исследование, оно большое и интересное. Помогает оценить, что происходит в мире дизайна в снг прямо сейчас. Приятно находиться в компании своих друзей. И ильи. Четвёртый год в топе специалистов, за которыми следят в СНГ.

😁23❤14🤣6🦄2🎉1

20 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,640 views61 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Зафичерили моё портфолио на bestportfolio Внезапно и приятно 🥰 Оказался в компании лучших. Среди Аритры, Сухаила и Пратикаши UPD. Спустя сутки пришёл еще бейдж, что портфолио попало в топ-10, заняв шестое место в списке лучших😌

👍36🤣19🦄6

19 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,450 views53 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Всем, кто получил внж Испании – пользуйтесь

❤25😁23👌4👎1

16 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC≈2,580 views45 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Воровство – это признание Честно, не понимаю, почему многих бесит, когда их работу крадут. Ровно так же не понимаю, почему большинство не показывает процесс и свои концепты, не говорят об этом на конференциях из-за nda и прочей ереси. Если после этого кто-то использует твою работу, это говорит лишь о твоём уровне. Моя планка качества, которую я транслирую команде – сделать так, чтобы конкуренты у нас воровали. Есл…

❤30👍7👎4🔥3😁1

16 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,650 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Задумался тут: если AI-агент выбирает товар за клиента, то для кого мы вообще делаем продукт? Вот смотрите. Мы годами строим персональные рекомендации, тестируем гипотезы, оптимизируем воронки — борьба идёт за внимание человека. Тем временем человек говорит своему агенту «собери ужин на двоих за 2500, без лактозы, с доставкой к 19:00» — и агент сам сопоставляет все варианты, а потом выдает готовые ответы. Кому тогд…

❤11👎4👍3

13 Oct 2026, 18:27 UTC≈2,490 views67 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Опыт есть, работы нет Боже, ну говорила мама, не открывай тредс на ночь глядя.. Нет, надо было да? Короче, очередной пост, где дизайнер негодует, мол, 10+ лет опыта, а работы нет. Забавно, что все претензии о том, что оказывается надо сделать портфолио, отобрать релевантные проекты, собеседования проходить. Но при этом оставаться на фрилансе почему-то не хочет. Не пойму только, с каких пор цифра в опыте стала проп…

😁52💯8❤5👎1💅1

6 Oct 2026, 15:49 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 8 November 2026

Какая у тебя была зарплата в 20 лет?

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @b_goncharenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,012
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,243
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,914
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,223
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,413
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,528
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,066
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,105
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,329
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 62,923
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах
@blackproduct · 21,363
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,211
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 81,566
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,141
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 24,960
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,619
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,880
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева
@vladimir_merkushev · 21,844
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,876
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,316
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,918
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,618
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,049
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,116
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps” (@b_goncharenko), 15,164 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b_goncharenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.