Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дизайнер, привет

Channel

Дизайнер, привет

@jun_hi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,461subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001764614500
TypeChannel
Username@jun_hi
DescriptionРеклама и связь: @generalsupport Канал с вакансиями: @jun_hi_vacancies Канал с рефами: @refs_hi ——— Пишу о дизайне и жизни ❤️ product designer ex: магнит, x5 retail, точка, whoosh, unabank
Created12 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jun_hi

Growth

23,46123,49023,475.57 August 2026 — 23,463 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,463 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,467 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,466 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,467 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,465 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,468 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,470 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,475 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,485 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,490 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,485 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,486 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,487 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,471 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,461 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,457–23,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 12:1623,461-10
21 Aug 2026, 01:2523,471-16
19 Aug 2026, 21:5123,487+1
18 Aug 2026, 20:2623,486+1
17 Aug 2026, 18:3723,485-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:1623,490+5
15 Aug 2026, 01:4423,485+10
13 Aug 2026, 18:2923,475+5
12 Aug 2026, 15:1523,470+2
11 Aug 2026, 16:5323,468+3
10 Aug 2026, 16:2323,465-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:0123,467+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:5723,466-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:2723,467+4
7 Aug 2026, 04:3023,463no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:2223,463first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 23,461 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held42 (28 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total114,310
Reactions total1,943
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,890
Videos
119
Links
1,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,943 reactions across 42 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67934.9%
😁39520.3%
👍34117.6%
🔥31916.4%
🤯1759.01%
🤔241.24%
😢100.515%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,943reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 42 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jun_hi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,420 views22 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

Как я запустил HireHi, не написав ни одной строчки кода 😁 Когда я начинал делать свой сервис, команды разработки у меня не было. Да и сам я код писать вообще не умел. Было только понимание, каким должен быть продукт, куча проблем текущих агрегаторов и желание попробовать сделать лучше. В итоге весь фронт, бэк, админку и тесты я собрал с помощью AI. Моей задачей было нормально объяснять, что должно происходить, пров

9🔥7😁6

21 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,660 views77 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Делайте как кайф Я выложил этот реф в канал с рефами, у него там много дизлайков. Но самый прикол в том, что автор этой прилы её выпустил в AppStore ровно в таком дизайне. Вот ссылка А после он написал об этом в Х, собрал сотни тысяч показов и первые деньги выручки) Мораль: никогда и никого не слушайте и делайте так, как по кайфу вам. А эксперты и советчики, что это хрень и так не надо будут всегда) У меня тоже и

55🔥10👍7😁5

21 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,790 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Как проектировать интерфейс для ИИ-агента Дэмиен разбирает работу над Copywriter, сервисом для создания шаблонов продуктовых текстов. Раньше клиент заполнял форму, разработчик вручную собирал шаблон, а команда несколько раз обновляла его после обратной связи. Такой процесс плохо масштабировался. Теперь агент получает примеры хороших текстов, определяет структуру и правила, создаёт шаблон и обновляет его после про

7🔥3🤯2👍1

20 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,890 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Иногда рынок IT напоминает подъём в гору 🏔 Пока я делаю HireHi, каждый день смотрю вакансии и вижу, как быстро меняются требования. Вчера дизайнеру хватало Фигмы, исследований и хорошего портфолио. Сегодня уже спрашивают про AI-агентов, работу с кодом, метрики и ещё десяток новых инструментов. Пытаешься за всем успеть, открываешь очередной сервис, читаешь про новый набор навыков и в какой-то момент уже не понимаешь

7😁7🔥4🤔2

20 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,980 views85 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Если вы думаете, что у вас что-то с головой, прочитайте скрин и вы поймёте, что с вами всё нормально. А компании и руководству на скрине, кто таким помышляет желаю скорее закрыться и никогда больше не взаимодействовать с людьми и их не нанимать. Компанию я не знаю, но сам факт, что такой пиздец есть шокирует. Увидел скрин на просторах Х и стало плохо. Никогда не идите в такие компании, где вы чувствуете изначально

🤯46😁268👍3🔥1😢1

20 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,090 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔐 OTP-поле ломает вход даже за несколько секунд Антонина из ЮMoney разобрала, почему ввод кода из смс часто бесит: не срабатывает автоподстановка, криво вставляется код, теряется фокус, после ошибки приходится набирать всё заново. Готовых единых правил в исследованиях не нашлось, поэтому команда сопоставила источники и собрала практические рекомендации. Главный вывод простой: лучший сценарий, когда код вообще не над

9👍2🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC≈2,300 views91 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Че делаете? Я вот хедер запинил при скролле в 2 ночи. Залил на прод кстати уже

🔥65😁177🤯2

19 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,390 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Связка с АИ Недавно писал про свой воркфлоу, который меня устраивает по цене и эффективности. Самое приятное в нём, что инструменты уже работают связкой. Один помогает с одним этапом, другой подхватывает дальше, и не приходится каждый раз собирать всё с нуля. У многих сейчас примерно такой же набор: Claude, GPT, генераторы, Фигма. Только каждый инструмент живёт отдельно. Тут сгенерил текст, там попросил накидать ид

😁107🔥2😢2

19 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,220 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🧭 Первую работу в ИТ ищут не по мечте, а по доказательствам Маргарита Лукманова в «Кинжале» отвечает читателю, который проходит курсы, но без коммерческих проектов чувствует себя «никому не нужным». Это не так: без реального опыта войти можно, но одного желания мало. Нужны артефакты, которые показывают, что вы уже решаете маленькие рабочие задачи: учебный проект, пет-проект, тестовое или волонтёрский кейс. Первая ро

6👍3🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,340 views18 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

🧭 Нет жалоб. Это ещё не значит, что интерфейс удобен Дмитрий Смагин из ПИК рассказывает, как команда впервые начала системно работать с интерфейсами внутреннего B2B-продукта для конструктивного проектирования. На демо заказчики принимали функционал без критики, хотя интерфейс был слабым. Проблема оказалась не только в экранах, а в процессах: не было макетов, дизайнеров, единого набора правил и нормальной обратной св

👍85😁4🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,410 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔔 Inspiration #197 Подборка лендингов и сайтов для вдохновения на предстоящую неделю 🔥 – ogakidigital.com – coda.co – shiori.sh – mues.ai – motherdesign.com – riffo.ai ——— – focusfour.app/en – smith-diction.com – structured.money – affinity.studio – betterway.fr – riptype.xyz ——— – frostcollective.com – beta.deuxhuithuit.com – moody.mjarosz.com – radaville.studio – ourlifeswork.com – garriock.com ——— – obviou

7👍3🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈3,120 views73 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Безумие за 60 млрд! Думал ли Майкл Труэлл и его банда, создавая курсор в 2022 году (как будто вчера), что сегодня они зафиналят сделку с SpaceXAI на 60 млрд долларов. Я напомню, что 4 года назад Майкл лично писал каждому пользователю курсора касаемо багов и прочего. Спустя 4 года в его кармане 15 млрд долларов и связь с Маском. Просто легенда! А ему всего 25 лет. А Маск легенда вдвойне и я думаю, это одна из самы

👍34🔥2110🤔4😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @jun_hi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,621 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 63,357
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 78,401
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,894
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Telegram Designers
@designers · 71,910
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 87,404
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Учебник дизайнера
@dsgn_tutorial · 83,624
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Джуниор Вакансии Стажировки IT
@juniors_rabota_jobs · 66,556
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 106,665
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
СЕТИ — IT & Digital вакансии
@it_vakansii_jobs · 93,552
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Young & Junior - вакансии IT
@young_june · 71,900
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дизайнер, привет” (@jun_hi), 23,461 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jun_hi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.