Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хороший интерфейс

Channel

Хороший интерфейс

@goodux

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,805subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001368931815
TypeChannel
Username@goodux
Created4 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goodux

Growth

6,7706,8056,787.57 August 2026 — 6,775 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,775 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,773 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,771 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,774 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,778 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,776 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,781 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,792 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,805 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,765–6,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:216,805+13
3 Sept 2026, 14:586,792+11
31 Aug 2026, 00:056,781+5
27 Aug 2026, 14:036,776-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:196,778+4
20 Aug 2026, 11:246,774+4
17 Aug 2026, 19:576,770-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:086,771-2
11 Aug 2026, 05:046,773-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:436,775no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:186,775first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 6,805 subscribers
Avg views / post
978
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held24 (28 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total10,760
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 09s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

272 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11943.8%
😁7025.7%
🔥5721.0%
👏165.88%
🤔103.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goodux. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.17%
1 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,480
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,110
over 23 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvFhZrB17 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC536 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Страшно не успеть за AI.🏃‍♂️ Вокруг уже будто все собирают макеты агентами, а ты все еще делаешь руками. По сути, это просто еще один инструмент. Сначала непривычно, потом становится частью работы. Кстати, 20 августа у Pixel Perfect будет бесплатный эфир 😇 Ребята возьмут большую дизайн-систему банка и попробуют собрать по ней новые экраны с помощью AI-агента. Причем покажут не только, что получилось в итоге, а весь

1

19 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC680 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Самый безумный сайт со шрифтами в истории, который я видел – departuremono.com Кстати, поддерживает кириллицу. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

🔥62

19 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC868 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Если на концерте Канье будет та самая сфера 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

🔥7😁51

19 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC863 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Компания Anthropic запустила новый навык /design Он может анализировать ваш код, понимать существующий визуальный стиль и генерировать редактируемые артборды пользовательского интерфейса непосредственно из кода Клода. Вы можете просмотреть варианты, подкорректировать дизайн, а затем попросить Клода реализовать его в коде. В настоящее время доступен в качестве предварительной версии для пользователей Pro, Max, Team

9🔥2

18 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC855 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🔈 Как найти работу в 2026 году Вы все слышали о том, что происходит с рынком труда (если коротко там полный трэш) - hh / rabotaby глючит, вакансии исчезают, конкуренция х10, а рекрутеры просто не отвечают. Каждую неделю новые правила, и ты либо под них подстраиваешься, либо идешь нахер. Эта подборочка может закрыть базу. Не моего авторства, но я посмотрела и там прям очень хорошо, можно использовать. 🔴10 ключевых

2

18 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC852 views28 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Когда вы уже экспортировали и обнаружили опечатку 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

😁244

17 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,110 views43 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

В фигму добавили умный перенос текста из CSS с text-wrap: balance и pretty text-wrap: balance Подбирает переносы так, чтобы все строки блока получились примерно одинаковой длины. Это особенно хорошо работает для заголовков и коротких блоков текста. text-wrap: pretty решает проблему «висячей строки» и переносит текст так, чтобы в последней строке оказалось минимум два-три слова. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

32🔥11

17 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC956 views24 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Video

Вот что Apple постит в TikTok 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

😁21🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Успей получить грант до 75% на магистратуру по дизайну Школа дизайна Центрального университета завершает набор в магистратуру «Проектирование человеческого опыта» — программу для тех, кто хочет выйти за рамки привычного дизайна и создавать опыт, системы и смыслы. Студенты выберут направление для углубленного изучения: ⚫️«Продуктовый дизайн», в рамках которого пройдут весь путь создания цифрового продукта — от иссле

13 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,600 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Эволюция работы с 3D в After Effects с 1997 по 2026 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

9👏2

13 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Adobe Premiere в нативном режиме на Apple Vision Pro Приложение для visionOS оснащено полноценным интерфейсом для пространственного монтажа с плавающими панелями, поддержкой пространственных видеороликов и инструментами настройки глубины текста. Уже доступно в App Store. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс

9

7 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,480 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvFhZrBPhoto

Дизайн уже не тот. И это хорошая новость. ДизайнКонф II — конференция от Британской высшей школы дизайна о том, как сегодня устроена индустрия и какие навыки теперь определяют современного дизайнера. За один день мы разберем четыре направления современного коммуникационного дизайна: графический дизайн, моушн, UX/UI и арт-дирекшн. Вместе с экспертами из Яндекса, Т-Банка, Самоката, The WAK, Щуки, Tuman, Щелочь, Ambi

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @goodux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,288
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 87,136
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 106,282
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 35,875
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,613
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Вакансии дизайнерам
@jun_hi_vacancies · 42,543
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 35,140
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 80,192
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Оди
@awdee · 33,532
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хороший интерфейс” (@goodux), 6,805 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodux.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.