Figma представила новые возможности Code Layers, которые позволяют работать с интерактивными прототипами прямо на холсте. Теперь можно превратить обычный макет в работающий интерфейс с реальными взаимодействиями и анимациями, а затем дорабатывать его через Figma Agent. Также можно переносить существующие сайты в Figma через расширение для Chrome, добавлять прототипы из кода через MCP и дублировать их, чтобы сравнив…

Channel
Figma Design
@figmadesign
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
105,332subscribers
-1,588 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001443540902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @figmadesign @figmaplugin |
| Description | Сотрудничество: @normanross |
| Created | 16 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 101 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/figmadesign |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 105,332 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 105,335 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 105,353 | no change |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 105,353 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 105,373 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 105,379 | -21 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 105,400 | -17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 105,417 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 105,431 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 105,441 | -21 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 105,462 | no change |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 105,462 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 105,486 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 105,492 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 105,511 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 105,514 | -22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 105,536 | no change |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 105,536 | -19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 105,555 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 105,561 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.4%
- avg views ÷ 105,332 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,000
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (18 May 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 119,930 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈986
- Videos
- ≈326
- Links
- ≈1,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 15m 51s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 81
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 18
- of 39 we hold a reading for · 46%
- Most on one post
- 13
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @figmadesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.56%
- 1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 12,000
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 20,000
- over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vfnxy12fB2 | 1 | 30 September 2026 | 30 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
На Config India Figma представила сразу несколько обновлений. Code Layers позволяют работать с кодом прямо на холсте, а новые Specs помогают собирать документацию, требования и контекст проекта в одном месте. Для AI-агентов добавили Guidelines и Code Sources, чтобы они лучше понимали дизайн-систему и могли использовать существующие компоненты и код. Еще анонсировали Payload, инструмент для публикации сайтов прямо …
Расширение Figma для Chrome теперь умеет захватывать код веб-страниц и переносить его прямо в Figma в виде кодового слоя. Так можно работать с существующими сайтами непосредственно в редакторе, сохраняя их код.
Figma Agent теперь умеет лучше работать с контекстом из разных файлов. Можно попросить его подтянуть контент сразу из нескольких дизайн-файлов, прочитать стикеры или текст из FigJam и добавить их в макет как аннотации. Еще агент умеет находить изображения в Figma Slides и переносить их в дизайн, например чтобы сразу применить к ним эффекты.
Figma Agent вышел из беты Он работает прямо на холсте и помогает не выпадать из процесса: можно просить менять макеты, собирать новые варианты, применять дизайн-систему, разбирать фидбек и автоматизировать рутину. www.figma.com/blog/workflow-lab-staying-in-the-flow-with-the-figma-agent/
В Figma Motion теперь доступны анимации текста и аудио. Текст можно анимировать по символам, словам или строкам и настраивать появление прямо на таймлайне. Туда же теперь можно добавлять аудиодорожки и синхронизировать их с анимацией. Обновление уже доступно. www.figma.com/community/file/1682540379260940278/figma-motion-updates?fuid=1432793107374253430
В Figma Motion появилось сразу несколько обновлений Теперь можно сохранять собственные стили анимации, публиковать их в библиотеки и использовать по всей дизайн-системе. Эти же стили смогут автоматически применять Figma Agent и кодовые агенты через MCP, а в skills на них можно будет ссылаться как на готовые правила. Также уже доступен экспорт в Lottie. На следующей неделе добавят аудио на таймлайн и анимации текст…
Blur FX — плагин для создания радиального, углового и motion blur прямо в Figma. Можно настраивать интенсивность, направление и точку фокуса с live preview. Install plugin
Осенью у бизнеса снова появляется то, на что летом не хватало времени: новый сайт, обновление визуала, маркетинговую стратегию и десятки других задач. Найти того, кто просто возьмёт и сделает всё без месяца собеседований и найма в штат — отдельная задача. Поэтому 7 млн человек ежемесячно ищут услуги дизайнеров и других фрилансеров на Авито Услугах. Чтобы попасть в этот поток, достаточно трёх шагов: оформить профиль…
Вот так Figma выглядела 10 лет назад. Именно 28 сентября 2016 года сервис вышел в публичный доступ.
Auto Layout в Figma научился переносить элементы по вертикали. В вертикальном Auto Layout появился Wrap. Если контент не помещается по высоте, элементы переходят в новую колонку, а не выходят за границы фрейма. Механика повторяет поведение CSS Flexbox и подходит для адаптивных списков, карточек и многостолбцовых интерфейсов с меняющимся количеством элементов.
Небольшой лайфхак для Figma: левую панель можно скрыть и оставить больше места под работу.
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @figmadesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@easyfigma · 25,264#1
@figmaweb · 40,080#2
@Figmachex · 17,609#3
@EasyAdobeAI · 13,388#4
@dezzigners · 8,442#5
@ludochka_plugins · 19,216#6
@designdealer · 86,252#7
@secretd · 22,172#8
@dsgn_tutorial · 81,681#9
@wtfont · 129,372#10
@poyasnizaux · 20,021#11
@design_telega · 77,797#12
@uxidesign · 20,526#13
@uxnotes · 23,588#14
@lagutalaguta · 7,468#15
@thedesigner · 29,758#16
@design_jam · 6,750#17
@design_awesome · 9,589#18
@EasyAdobePS · 21,390#19
@design_awards · 21,696#20
@dbooks · 63,140#21
@a1exeybychkov · 16,775#22
@duiux · 6,630#23
@goodux · 7,039#24
@AGIMAdesign · 3,198#25
@chipsadesign · 4,318#26
@uha_dsgn · 17,380#27
@ui_tools · 10,428#28
@sayhellotomaxshirko · 10,445#29
@true_figma · 25,769#30
@editboat · 12,557#31
@uxrdsgn · 8,368#32
@figma2html · 44,702#33
@uxfromhell · 50,357#34
@cyrillicdesign · 34,563#35
@dsgn_edu · 34,114#36
@uxlive · 36,166#37
@jun_hi · 23,422#38
@pdigest · 49,162#39
@local_talent · 9,123#40
@ozondesign · 17,914#41
@nowhow · 24,394#42
@awdee · 33,311#43
@ilyaskopin · 9,980#44
@designhunters · 79,877#45
@interfacefuture · 6,343#46
@behancerdsgn · 40,734#47
@uxfail · 13,215#48
@refs_hi · 9,588#49
@visualmove · 29,867#50
@jun_hi_vacancies · 43,009#51
@cyrillicbrands · 7,412#52
@designsniper · 27,984#53
@sexyfont · 134,109#54
@sortofdesign · 12,449#55
@uifail · 14,590#56
@craftworkdesign · 4,855#57
@posterino · 57,138#58
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,111#59
@bbeuxui · 10,491#60
@uxhorn · 21,294#61
@b_goncharenko · 15,237#62
@shrift_free · 57,581#63
@DesignBoard · 9,394#64
@design_translator · 20,646#65
@wannabelikerozov17feb · 16,099#66
@desprod · 25,670#67
@max_kanalchik · 14,223#68
@fontsch · 67,221#69
@designdomashka · 11,839#70
@featureoftheday · 12,290#71
@senior_designer_pragmatica · 17,428#72
@rozetked · 652,973#73
@temalebedev · 971,458#74
@ayuev · 12,887#75
@crauchru · 5,920#76
@uprockpro · 18,472#77
@dprofileru · 10,905#78
@mockup_curator · 45,004#79
@ochen_studio · 6,619#80
@uxlead · 3,456#81
@ui_muse · 5,096#82
@exploitex · 2,016,846#83
@designvorkel · 10,082#84
@morrre_dsgn · 9,891#85
@blinklinks · 3,219#86
@mobileux · 9,832#87
@dprofilejob · 17,902#88
@pixelmove · 4,045#89
@intelligentdsgners · 25,020#90
@dsgners · 19,180#91
@tildanews · 32,670#92
@psd_eu · 26,266#93
@fordesigner · 25,215#94
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@easyfigma · 25,264
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
@figmaweb · 40,080
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
@ludochka_plugins · 19,216
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
@figma60sec · 24,897
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@thedesigner · 29,758
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@EasyAdobePS · 21,390
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
@designdealer · 86,252
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@posterino · 57,138
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
@dsgn_edu · 34,114
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
@uprockdesign · 21,393
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
@mokaposhnaya · 61,754
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
@designrar · 50,648
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@wtfont · 129,372
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@true_figma · 25,769
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@Illustrationlessons · 47,398
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@figma24 · 18,867
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
@figma_maketss · 34,820
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@figma2html · 44,702
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@dbooks · 63,140
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
@dsgn_tutorial · 81,681
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@secretd · 22,172
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
@design_telega · 77,797
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@shrift_free · 57,581
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@uxidesign · 20,526
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 91 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Figma Design” (@figmadesign), 105,332 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/figmadesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.