Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Radical Rozova

Channel

Radical Rozova

@valerierozov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,996subscribers

-289 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258460104
TypeChannel
Username@valerierozov
Created1 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/valerierozov

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,99510,28510,1406 August 2026 — 10,285 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,285 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,278 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,274 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,234 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,209 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,204 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,200 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,199 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,200 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,186 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,181 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,177 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,173 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,165 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,159 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,147 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,122 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,113 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,101 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,093 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,091 subscribers27 September 2026 — 10,061 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,015 subscribers9 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,995 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,000 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,006 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,999 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,001 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,005 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,006 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,005 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,011 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,012 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,015 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,012 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,012 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,011 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,010 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,004 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,002 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,001 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,996 subscribers9,9966 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net -289. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,952–10,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 14:479,996-5
6 Nov 2026, 12:5710,001-1
5 Nov 2026, 12:3610,002-2
4 Nov 2026, 12:2010,004-6
3 Nov 2026, 13:2610,010-1
2 Nov 2026, 15:3110,011-1
1 Nov 2026, 18:1910,012-1
31 Oct 2026, 18:5710,013+1
30 Oct 2026, 20:4610,012-3
29 Oct 2026, 20:0610,015+2
28 Oct 2026, 22:5610,013+1
28 Oct 2026, 00:0610,012+1
27 Oct 2026, 02:4810,011+6
26 Oct 2026, 00:1910,005-1
24 Oct 2026, 23:2710,006+1
22 Oct 2026, 23:4910,005+4
21 Oct 2026, 20:5110,001+2
18 Oct 2026, 18:079,999-7
17 Oct 2026, 20:1710,006+6
16 Oct 2026, 19:4710,000first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 9,996 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held49 (24 May 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total9,470
Reactions total256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 09:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,310 reactions across 48 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,310100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
136
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 49 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
53
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @valerierozov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

18 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,730 views73 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

У Rare&Chosen тут недавно было очередное мероприятие. Мы снимали атмосферный и очень вкусный (что редкость для Лондона и для групповых мероприятий) французский винный бар. Ближе к концу ужина главный менеджер, Грегуар, стал мыть и натирать винные бокалы. Я подскочила к нему, чтобы он мне показал, как это делается. Дома я постоянно страдаю от того, что бокалы такие все заляпанные, как будто достались мне от древних…

❤73

16 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC≈2,300 views53 reactions4 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

А у нас новый промпт для ChatGPT. Оставлю в комментарии для тех, кто хочет такое же про себя.

❤53

15 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,540 views89 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я сдала на права только с третьего раза. Это было унизительно и тяжело, я уже не говорю про то, сколько это стоило. В Англии сдать на права сложнее, чем получить паспорт. Очередь на практический экзамен 11 месяцев. И то, это запись в какой-нибудь дурацкий тест-центр черт знает где. Самое обидное было то, что во время второй попытки я уже ехала назад в тест центр, до конца экзамена оставалось пару минут. И тут, ког…

❤89

12 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,900 views41 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мой муж последние 2 года развивает свою международную студию. Они делают бренды, AI-native дизайн интерфейсов, классные и современные коммуникации. Поражаюсь, насколько иначе в UK выглядит клиентский рынок. Компания у тебя, вроде бы, в Лондоне — а клиенты вообще отовсюду, от Индии и Сингапура до Калифорнии и ЮАР. И еще больше поражаюсь, насколько одинаково выглядит рынок кандидатов и проблемы на нем. Что дома мы за…

❤41

7 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC≈2,880 views44 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вышло интервью основателя Higgsfield, Алекса Машрабова Смотреть можно тут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszn8rFtxm4 Мне очень нравится Алекс. Среди многих современных успешных стартаперов, которые таким похвастаться не могут, он похож на человека искреннего, трудолюбивого. Абсолютно не вижу в нем никаких понтов, попытки доминировать или какого-то липкого чувства собственного превосходства. Очень приятный, интер…

❤44

6 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC≈2,410 views69 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я нашла свое слабое место Еще одно!) Была на рабочем звонке с моей испанской командой. Мы обсуждали статусы по нашим делам. Наши дела — это различные мероприятия для сообщества в Лондоне. А статус у нас такой. Мы неплохо поставили на поток обычные мероприятия. В этом году мы победили многолетних лидеров, Милан и Мадрид, по количеству ивентов. У нас уже есть понятные рабочие форматы, удобные для нас площадки и кал…

❤69

2 Oct 2026, 08:43 UTC≈2,810 views57 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Чему стартапы могут научиться у Фаберже Вчера я побывала на выставке Фаберже в лондонском магазине компании. Я не большой любитель объектного искусства, поэтому удивилась, что вышла оттуда вдохновлённой. Спросила себя почему. 01 Наследие. В tech мы пренебрегаем наследием в угоду инноваций. Да, тех молод, а Фаберже существует с 1842 года. Но они строили своё наследие шаг за шагом. В эпоху ИИ конкуренция всё чаще ид…

❤57

1 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,610 views83 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Можно по-разному относиться к Олегу Тинькову, но я восхищаюсь его чувством юмора и отношением к себе :)

❤83

1 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,680 views137 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Только спустя четыре года в эмиграции до меня дошло нечто ужасное Причем Миша говорил мне про это, когда мы только приехали. Я как-то послушала, не обратила внимания и пошла дальше. Я здесь — никто. Дома у меня была репутация, связи, место под солнцем. Люди понимали, где я работала, что я делала и пользовались продуктами, которые я разрабатывала. Я хорошо знала, как работает привлечение, что можно запускать, а у …

❤137

30 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC≈2,550 views58 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Трамп запустил новый сайт для доступа к государственным услугам Во-первых, это красиво. Во-вторых, все, кто жил в Америке, всегда плевались от того, как сложно получить любую госуслугу. Даже не верится, что это можно поправить одним днем. В-третьих, дизайном занимался Joe Gebbia, основатель Airbnb, а теперь — U.S. Chief Design Officer. В-четвертых, сайт работает на Gemini и Grok. Честно — меня такое супер вдохно…

❤58

30 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,280 views22 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026

Ко мне довольно регулярно приходят с запросом на менторство. Последние пару лет я всегда отказывала: у меня был не самый удачный опыт с этим форматом, и я его для себя закрыла. Но в последнее время я сама начала обращаться к менторам по тем вопросам, где захожу на новую для себя территорию. И моя чакра немного разблокировалась. Мне очень нравится помогать, поддерживать и смотреть за развитием руководителей и специал…

❤22

29 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,180 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Тестирую Instinct 28 сентября Instinct объявил о привлечении $1 млрд при оценке $10 млрд. Ещё месяц назад он привлёк $250 млн при оценке $2,5 млрд — то есть оценка выросла в четыре раза за месяц. Среди инвесторов — Sequoia, Benchmark и Coatue. Instinct делает персонального AI-ассистента, которому можно делегировать бытовые дела. Общение идёт через привычные мессенджеры, включая WhatsApp и iMessage: просишь забронир…

❤24

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @valerierozov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @valerierozov as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

Сколько часов в день вы работаете?

  1. меньше 514%
  2. 5-618%
  3. 7-828%
  4. 9-1028%
  5. 11-1410%
  6. больше 142%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,394
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Дашич, беги🚀
@dashich_begi · 41,077
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,619
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,398
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
По ходу разберёмся
@pohodu_media · 27,922
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
Нагуглила карьеру
@dreamcatchme · 27,723
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 38,087
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Hire ProProduct - Продуктовые вакансии
@hireproproduct · 24,912
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,618
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Epic Growth — рост продуктов
@epicgrowth · 26,083
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Product Management & AI
@ruspm · 25,022
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Job for Products and Projects
@forproducts · 70,755
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Менеджер от боженьки
@pm_god · 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева
@vladimir_merkushev · 21,847
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,736
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Connectable Jobs
@zarubezhom_jobs · 106,277
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,084
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
AgileFluent: карьера без границ
@agilefluent · 48,676
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,327
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Вакансии для продакт-менеджеров
@productjobgo · 23,128
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Radical Rozova” (@valerierozov), 9,996 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valerierozov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.