Channel
@EntrpriseAgileRussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,337subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450343491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EntrpriseAgileRussia |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EntrpriseAgileRussia |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 5,337 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 5,340 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:52 | 5,342 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 5,348 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 5,350 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 5,355 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 5,358 | +19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 5,339 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 5,348 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 5,363 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 5,367 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 5,368 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 5,368 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 17.8% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 16.8% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 12.1% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 🤪 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.61% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.61% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 3.74% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚄 Для процветания в цифровую эпоху недостаточно создавать инновационные решения. Их надо создавать быстро, а для этого требуется поток. Организации, которые понимают свой поток и показатели, используемые для его измерения, имеют возможность оптимизировать свои потоки создания ценности, чтобы постоянно получать конкурентные преимущества. В этой статье Дины Соболевой Ускорение потока в SAFe® вы найдете инструкцию SAFe…
👍1🔥1🤝1🙏1
💼 Традиционные подходы к управлению портфелем не предназначены для конкуренции в эпоху ИТ, цифровизации и ИИ. Сегодня компании вынуждены оперировать в условиях высокой неопределённости и под давлением поставлять инновационные продукты и решения быстрее. Несмотря на активные массивные изменения на рынке, управление портфелем сохраняет устаревшие практики. Модернизация управления портфелем — критическая задача при внед…
❤1👍1🔥1🤝1🙏1
Ближайшие события: • бесплатный курс самообучения «Быстрый старт в ИИ»: https://c-lead.link/zlmecn, «Быстрый старт в SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/4s9kxw. • 24 августа — тренинг «Масштабирование Agile по SAFe® в эпоху ИИ»: https://c-lead.link/gagbg7. • 16 сентября — бесплатный семинар «Обзор SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/6jqejc. • 19 октября — тренинг «Lean-управление портфелем в SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/aql7vf. • 16 …
🤣1🤪1😁1
🚀 SAFe® на масштабе корпораций Как управлять разработкой, когда в контуре работают тысячи инженеров, продукты усложняются, а бизнес требует предсказуемости? Ответ кроется в правильном масштабировании Agile и внедрении SAFe® (Scaled Agile Framework). Мы собрали для вас лучшие доклады о практике применения SAFe® с конференций Enterprise Agile Russia (2023–2025 гг.): 🔹 YADRO — Максим Матвеев и Сергей Лебедев: «Тернис…
⚡1👍1🔥1🙏1
#memes #мемы #юмор Enterprise Agile Russia: Telegram | VK | MAX | Сетка.
🔥2💯1🤣1🤪1😁1
📹 Видео «Эпики в SAFe®». Перевод и озвучивание выполнил Руслан Кузюров. Видео в высоком разрешении можно посмотреть здесь. #safe #videos #видео Enterprise Agile Russia: Telegram | VK | MAX | Сетка.
👍1🔥1🙏1
Цели и ключевые результаты (Objectives and Key Results, OKR) — это методика совместной работы для постановки четких целей и измеримых результатов. В статье Александра Остроухова Цели и ключевые результаты — OKR в SAFe® описываются возможности применения OKR в крупной организации в рамках фреймворка SAFe® (Scaled Agile Framework®). Вольный перевод статьи «OKRs — Scaled Agile Framework». #okr #safe #articles #статьи…
👍2⚡1🔥1🙏1
Ближайшие события: • бесплатный курс самообучения «Быстрый старт в ИИ»: https://c-lead.link/zlmecn, «Быстрый старт в SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/4s9kxw. • 24 августа — тренинг «Масштабирование Agile по SAFe® в эпоху ИИ»: https://c-lead.link/gagbg7. • 16 сентября — бесплатный семинар «Обзор SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/6jqejc. • 19 октября — тренинг «Lean-управление портфелем в SAFe®»: https://c-lead.link/aql7vf. • 16 …
👍2❤1👏1💯1🤣1🤩1🤪1
Как крупнейшие компании России строят дашборды и метрики? Каждый лидер изменений мечтает о «золотом дашборде» — инструменте, который за 30 секунд покажет честное состояние здоровья продуктов, ИТ-команд и всей трансформации. Но как сделать метрики живыми, а не превратить их в кладбище неактуальных задач? Мы собрали лучшие доклады с конференций Enterprise Agile Russia за 2023–2025 годы, посвященные оцифровке процессо…
❤4🔥3🏆1🤝1🤩1🙏1
#memes #мемы #юмор Enterprise Agile Russia: Telegram | VK | MAX | Сетка.
❤2🤪2👏1🔥1🤣1🤩1😁1
💥 Бесплатная очная конференция OKR Russia на тему «Стратегия выживших 2026». 📅 Когда: 20 августа в 14:00–19:00 МСК. 📍Где: Музей Росгосстрах | г. Москва, ул. Киевская, д. 7к1, подъезд 4. О чем будем говорить: • Управление ростом в условиях отсутствия ликвидности и увеличения налоговой нагрузки. • Бережливое исполнение стратегии без инвестиций. • Стратегия без бюджетов через операционную эффективность. Программа ко…
❤1🏆1👍1👏1💯1🔥1🤩1🫡1
В PDF-брошюре Карьерный трек SAFe® собраны пути развития различных ролей сотрудников крупных организаций, применяющих SAFe. Внутри брошюры вы найдете детальный разбор карьерного пути для: 🔹SAFe® Agilist — для руководителей организаций. 🔹SAFe® Scrum Master — для руководителей команд и Скрам-мастеров. 🔹SAFe® Product Owner — для владельцев и менеджеров продуктов. 🔹SAFe® Release Train Engineer — руководителей программ и…
🤩3👏2⚡1❤1🔥1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @EntrpriseAgileRussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Enterprise Agile Russia” (@EntrpriseAgileRussia), 5,337 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EntrpriseAgileRussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.