Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 59 days, net -2,039. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,820–53,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 01:16
51,126
-258
28 Sept 2026, 00:19
51,384
-446
17 Sept 2026, 15:39
51,830
-93
15 Sept 2026, 11:55
51,923
-62
13 Sept 2026, 19:55
51,985
-100
11 Sept 2026, 23:39
52,085
-19
9 Sept 2026, 10:59
52,104
-83
6 Sept 2026, 03:58
52,187
-88
4 Sept 2026, 00:57
52,275
-75
2 Sept 2026, 12:53
52,350
-64
1 Sept 2026, 10:05
52,414
-44
31 Aug 2026, 10:12
52,458
-68
30 Aug 2026, 08:07
52,526
-44
29 Aug 2026, 06:28
52,570
-42
28 Aug 2026, 03:25
52,612
-29
27 Aug 2026, 02:01
52,641
-50
26 Aug 2026, 02:12
52,691
-43
25 Aug 2026, 03:28
52,734
-54
23 Aug 2026, 23:57
52,788
-82
22 Aug 2026, 09:14
52,870
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 51,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.837%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
105 (31 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
68,719
Reactions total
575
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 07:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,580
Videos
≈1,290
Links
≈2,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
26m 06s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,594 reactions across 105 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
456
28.6%
❤
437
27.4%
🔥
251
15.7%
🥰
131
8.22%
😁
125
7.84%
🤣
45
2.82%
💩
26
1.63%
🤡
22
1.38%
🤮
14
0.878%
🤬
13
0.816%
🙈
10
0.627%
👌
9
0.565%
👎
7
0.439%
😱
7
0.439%
🤷♀
6
0.376%
😍
4
0.251%
😈
3
0.188%
🤩
3
0.188%
🤯
3
0.188%
🥱
3
0.188%
11 further kinds
19
1.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,594 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.90%
2 of 105 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,480
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,790
over 103 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🎨 Ideogram 4.5 — ШІ-фотошоп для точкового редагування зображень
Колишні розробники Google випустили Ideogram 4.5 — модель, яка дозволяє змінювати окремі елементи зображення, не зачіпаючи решту.
Можна замінювати об’єкти, змінювати їхній колір, світло й тіні, редагувати написи, а також поетапно реставрувати старі фотографії. Після кількох правок зображення має зберігати початковий вигляд без помітної деградації якост…
🎮 universal-modder — Claude тепер може створювати моди для будь-яких ігор
Плагін навчив Claude працювати з іграми на рівні моддингу: він може перескладати рушій, декомпілювати код, генерувати графіку й аудіо та проводити тести.
За допомогою universal-modder вже робили експерименти з Minecraft у Skyrim, GTA 5, Cyberpunk 2077 та Elden Ring, додавали роботаксі в Age of Empires 2, скейтбординг у Call of Duty: Modern Wa…
🤖 Google обмежить доступ до моделей у безкоштовному Gemini
З 9 жовтня користувачі Gemini без підписки зможуть використовувати лише Flash-Lite.
Щоб отримати доступ до Flash, доведеться оформити AI Plus за $4,99/місяць, а за Pro — платити $19,99/місяць.
webguild 🇺🇦 › #resources
🛫 Anthropic показала фінанси перед IPO — $4,6 млрд виручки та $42 млрд збитку
Anthropic уперше розкрила фінансові показники перед виходом на біржу. У 2025 році компанія отримала майже $4,6 млрд виручки, але зафіксувала $42 млрд чистого збитку.
Втім, близько $34 млрд із цієї суми — бухгалтерське нарахування, пов’язане з переоцінкою фінансових інструментів, які можуть конвертуватися в акції. Реальний операційний збит…
💥 Destroy Any Website — рознесіть будь-який сайт у браузері
Вставляєте посилання на сайт у Destroy Any Website — і отримуєте під контроль солдата з цілим арсеналом. Можна стріляти з різної зброї, кидати гранати та літати за допомогою реактивного ранця.
Просто фанова штука, щоб трохи випустити пару 😄
🔗 Посилання
webguild 🇺🇦 › #resources
⚙️ HeyPCB — власна Figma для проєктування плат
HeyPCB переносить спільну роботу у світ електроніки. Можна просто скинути колегам посилання та разом у реальному часі проєктувати схеми й компонувати друковані плати прямо в браузері.
Як і у Figma, кожен інженер має власний кольоровий курсор, а всі зміни та розводка доріжок одразу відображаються у всієї команди.
🔗 Посилання
webguild 🇺🇦 › #resources
🚀 TECHNOLOGY ELEVATED: що варто вчити сьогодні, щоб залишатися актуальним завтра?
Поки АІ змінює те, як ми пишемо код, тестуємо, працюємо з даними, будуємо ML-системи та запускаємо рішення у production — у SoftServe Academy ми оновлюємо навчання разом із технологіями та фокусуємося на навичках і підходах, які вже використовуються в сучасній розробці.
Лови добірку найактуальніших tech-курсів:
👇🤖 Backend Development…
🫥 GoHide — «тривожна кнопка» для Windows
Утиліта дозволяє миттєво приховати відкриті вікна за допомогою гарячих клавіш. Причому вони зникають не лише з екрана — прибираються також із панелі задач та меню «Пуск».
🟡 Ctrl+Alt+H — приховати всі вікна
🟡 Ctrl+Alt+Shift+H — повернути їх назад
Приховані вікна не з’являються самі, а звук із відео автоматично вимикається. Зручно, коли потрібно швидко прибрати робочий прості…
🎮 Перевидання Відьмака 3 вийде вже ЗАВТРА
На PC, PS5 та Xbox Series ремастер займе 45 гігабайтів вільного місця, а на Switch 2 — 50 гігабайтів (бо буде як окрема гра).
Не забуваємо також, що з ресмастером завезуть офіційну українську текстову локалізацію 🥳🇺🇦
webguild 🇺🇦 › #news
🎮 Minecraft отримує новий вимір — Сифт
Новий світ спочатку з’явиться у Minecraft Dungeons II, яка вийде 29 вересня, а у 2027 році його планують додати до звичайного Minecraft.
Потрапити туди можна буде через загадкові розломи. Усередині — окремий світ зі своїми ландшафтами, небезпеками та незвичайними істотами.
webguild 🇺🇦 › #news
💻 Google відкрила безкоштовний курс із вайбкодингу
Курс AI for App Building навчає створювати застосунки за допомогою ШІ. Він складається з 3 модулів загальною тривалістю близько 2 годин:
• Discover vibe coding — знайомство з вайбкодингом та агентським ШІ.
• Learn how to vibe code — практична робота з промптами для майбутнього застосунку.
• Create your app using AI Studio — створення застосунку, робота з файлами, н…
🔥7👍5❤3
Signed John Galt
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @webguild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PythonHub @pythonlearnhub1 · 22,374 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 20 September 2026
Untold Coding @untoldcoding · 24,631 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 15 September 2026
Python Community 💻📝🆓 @pythoncoder2 · 21,288 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 23 September 2026
Web Devs @web_devs_i · 22,671 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
Helpme_coder @helpme_coder · 19,486 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
Webaddicted.in @web_addicted9 · 34,218 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Pythonlearnerr @pythonlearnerr · 107,694 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
Frontend Trend @frontend_trend · 19,053 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 October 2026
DesignWithRehana @designwithrehana · 22,682 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
CodeHype 🚀 @codehype · 23,427 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Code Wars @code_wars_official · 43,740 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Developer's Home👨💻 @developperHome · 68,070 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Coders World @codersworld1 · 149,059 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Webdevelopment657 @webdevelopment657 · 22,266 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
TCW - AI & Coding Resources 🚀👨💻 @the_coding_wizard · 177,960 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Codewith_muhilan @codewith_muhilan · 23,613 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Coding Stella @codingstella · 57,020 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Codewithrandom @Codewithrandom · 229,782 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Coding_knowledge @coding_knwledge01 · 78,396 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“webguild - українська IT-спільнота 🇺🇦” (@webguild), 51,126 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webguild.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.