Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1,867. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 234,003–236,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 00:37
234,283
-126
20 Aug 2026, 17:53
234,409
-132
19 Aug 2026, 14:16
234,541
-137
18 Aug 2026, 16:33
234,678
-148
17 Aug 2026, 13:26
234,826
-229
16 Aug 2026, 03:56
235,055
-136
14 Aug 2026, 16:48
235,191
-161
13 Aug 2026, 08:57
235,352
-140
12 Aug 2026, 08:32
235,492
-144
11 Aug 2026, 07:03
235,636
-191
10 Aug 2026, 05:22
235,827
-111
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
235,938
-95
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
236,033
-117
7 Aug 2026, 08:30
236,150
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:20
236,150
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.91%
avg views ÷ 234,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,900
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.194%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
28 (17 May 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
152,430
Reactions total
295
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
180
Videos
10
Links
677
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,478 reactions across 27 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,188
80.4%
🔥
86
5.82%
👍
73
4.94%
❤🔥
37
2.50%
🎉
24
1.62%
🗿
14
0.947%
🌚
12
0.812%
⚡
7
0.474%
👀
7
0.474%
🐳
6
0.406%
🤓
5
0.338%
🤯
5
0.338%
🤩
4
0.271%
🏆
3
0.203%
👨💻
2
0.135%
🙏
2
0.135%
🫡
2
0.135%
😁
1
0.068%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Best 5 Frontend Project 🤩
1. E-commerce Website Using Html Css And Javascript 😎
Click here For Code
2. Simple Portfolio Website Using Html And Css❤️🔥
Click here For Code
3. Weather App Using Html Css And Javascript💥
Click here For Code
4.Calendar Using Html Css And Javascript😍
Click here For Code
5. Dinosaur Game Using Html,Css and JavaScript Code💫
Click here For Code
Click On "Click here For Code" And Acces Projec…
FREE HTML - CSS Development Course by Facebook! 🤯 (30+ Hours of Content) With Free certificate 💯
👉Link: https://www.codewithrandom.com/2024/03/24/free-coding-resources/
✨ Don’t forget to react to this message for more awesome content like this! 👇
🙏 Thank you all for joining! 💙
🎉 100 Days, 100 HTML, CSS, and JavaScript Projects (Source Code) 🚀
Let's start creating all these projects in 100 days by making 1 project every day! 🌟
If you miss this website, you'll never find free HTML, CSS, and JavaScript projects like that! 🚀
👇🫶
https://www.codewithrandom.com/100-day-frontend-projects/
🇮🇳🤖 INDIA’S BIGGEST AI COMMUNITY🚀
AI is changing the world FAST.
Are you keeping up? 👀
🧠 Learn AI
⚡ Discover New Tools
🔥 Get Trending AI Updates
💻 Stay Ahead of the Tech Curve
✈️ JOIN NOW & ENTER the AI Era 👇👇
https://t.me/AJ_tech_career
🚨 You’ve heard about Git a thousand times…
But if someone asks “What exactly is Git and how does it work?” — it can still feel confusing. 😵💫
So I found a completely FREE interactive Git course for you. 👇
🎮 Learn Git by actually using it
💻 Practice real Git commands
📚 10 interactive lessons
📊 Track your progress + earn XP
🏆 Complete a Git mastery quiz
From git init to commits, branches, merging and remote reposit…
🚀 Full Stack Projects You Should Build (With Source Code)
1️⃣ AI SaaS Tool
Learn authentication, subscriptions, APIs & AI integration.
🔗 Source Code: https://github.com/ayusshrathore/ai-saas
2️⃣ Real-Time Collaborative Code Editor
Just like Google Docs but for coding. Multiple users can edit code simultaneously.
🔗 Source Code: https://github.com/Mohitur669/Realtime-Collaborative-Code-Editor
3️⃣ Trading Simulato…
100+ Ready-Made Portfolio Templates with Full Source Code👇👩💻
https://www.codewithrandom.com/2024/03/24/free-coding-resources/
We Create 1000+ HTML, CSS, and JavaScript Projects, Visit Our Website👇
https://www.codewithrandom.com/
💡 React to this message to get more amazing content like this! 👇
Thank you for being here! ❤️
✅ Master AI, ML & Data science with free courses >>>
Tap below to start learning👇🏻
🔗 https://www.codewithrandom.com/2025/04/09/all-free-coding-resources/
👍🏻 Don't forget to React to this Message for More Content like this 👇🏻
✅ Also, Share with others 🚀
100+ JavaScript Game Projects With Source Code👩💻
https://www.codewithrandom.com/2024/03/24/free-coding-resources/
Do not forget to React to this Message for More Content Like this 👇
Thanks For Joining All 💙🙏
🚀 Free Platforms to Host Your Coding Projects
1️⃣ GitHub Pages
👉 Best for simple static websites & portfolios
2️⃣ Heroku
👉 Easy backend + app deployment
3️⃣ Firebase Hosting
👉 Fast, secure, great for web apps
4️⃣ Vercel ⭐
👉 My current favorite
👉 Free analytics (limited)
👉 Next.js works insanely well
5️⃣ Netlify
👉 Simple deploy for frontend projects
💬 Which one do you use for hosting?
🔥 Bonus Guide:
A Complete …
❤46🔥2🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Codewithrandom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🚀 I’m planning a 100 Days Full Stack Course — completely FREE for everyone!
🔥 Yes, I’m in for 100 days95%
Not Interested😅5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,175,034 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Coders World @codersworld1 · 150,712 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Curious Coder @Curious_Coder · 136,420 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
TCW - AI & Coding Resources 🚀👨💻 @the_coding_wizard · 181,728 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
TheSanskaarSingh @codeslearningTG · 270,802 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Developer's Home👨💻 @developperHome · 68,645 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Pythonlearnerr @pythonlearnerr · 110,486 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
Coding_knowledge @coding_knwledge01 · 79,655 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
PythonNotes @pythonnotes1 · 78,494 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
NOTES GALLERY @NotesGallery1 · 91,373 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
Tricky Man @Trickyman2 · 154,594 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
Great Learning Academy @GreatLearningAcademy · 156,950 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
STUDY MATERIAL - Placement Jobs & Materials @studymaterial_IT · 93,679 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
Placement Lelo 2.0 @off_campus_jobs_and_internships · 65,380 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Job Updates | JobwithMayra @jobwithmayra · 102,781 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Krishan Kumar - Jobs & Internships Updates @jobs_and_internships_updates · 199,470 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Placementdrive.in @placementdriveofficial · 110,808 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Codewithrandom” (@Codewithrandom), 234,283 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Codewithrandom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.