Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 54 days, net -437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,838–15,407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 14:42
14,904
-54
26 Sept 2026, 10:02
14,958
-54
19 Sept 2026, 11:15
15,012
-15
17 Sept 2026, 00:00
15,027
-19
15 Sept 2026, 03:21
15,046
-10
13 Sept 2026, 14:18
15,056
-20
11 Sept 2026, 16:16
15,076
-23
9 Sept 2026, 05:01
15,099
-29
5 Sept 2026, 18:20
15,128
-11
3 Sept 2026, 15:19
15,139
-12
2 Sept 2026, 10:03
15,151
-14
1 Sept 2026, 11:15
15,165
-12
31 Aug 2026, 08:29
15,177
-2
30 Aug 2026, 10:37
15,179
-14
29 Aug 2026, 07:35
15,193
-12
28 Aug 2026, 04:43
15,205
-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:23
15,212
-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:07
15,220
-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:56
15,227
-8
24 Aug 2026, 01:57
15,235
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
114 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
62.3%
🔥
18
15.8%
👍
14
12.3%
🏆
6
5.26%
👨💻
2
1.75%
🙏
2
1.75%
👌
1
0.877%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💻 Master Backend Development with these 4 Videos! 🚀
1️⃣ Complete JAVA in 3 hours
🔗- https://youtu.be/eIrMbAQSU34?si=QhxLUBgVSAwj2vZs
2️⃣ Learn Git & Github in 1 hour
🔗- https://youtu.be/apGV9Kg7ics?si=i5f3s2ugC0BOz7xq
3️⃣ Complete Algorithms by Abdul Bari
🔗- https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDN4rrl48XKpZkf03iYFl-O29szjTrs_O&si=Z6V-DAjwnwyd4Wyz
4️⃣ Complete SQL in 3 hours
🔗- https://youtu.be/7S_tz1z_5bA?si=RETU…
You’re part of this coding & AI community. Which one describes you best?
🤔 I’m just exploring coding & AI21%
🌍 I’m from another country10%
🇮🇳 Indian, but living abroad8%
🇮🇳 I’m from India77%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎯 Learn DSA Visually (No Boring Theory)
Struggling with DSA?
That’s because it’s usually taught with too much text.
Here are 3 websites that explain DSA using visuals & animations 👀
🔹 visualgo.net
🔹 csvistool.com
🔹 clementmihailescu.github.io/Pathfinding-Visualizer/
If DSA never made sense before,
this will help a lot 🚀
❤️ React for more useful resources
🚀 Full Stack Projects You Should Build (With Source Code)
1️⃣ AI SaaS Tool
Learn authentication, subscriptions, APIs & AI integration.
🔗 Source Code: https://github.com/ayusshrathore/ai-saas
2️⃣ Real-Time Collaborative Code Editor
Just like Google Docs but for coding. Multiple users can edit code simultaneously.
🔗 Source Code: https://github.com/Mohitur669/Realtime-Collaborative-Code-Editor
3️⃣ Trading Simulato…
🔥 3 FREE Websites Every Frontend Developer Should Bookmark
🎨 1. Coolors
🌐 https://coolors.co
Generate beautiful color palettes in seconds. Lock your favorite colors, explore combinations, and export palettes instantly.
⚡ 2. Cubic Bezier
🌐 https://cubic-bezier.com
Create smooth custom CSS animation timing functions with a live visual preview. Perfect for making your UI feel more polished.
✨ 3. Animista
🌐 https://an…
Stop buying AI courses.
Top companies are teaching AI for free 👇
1/ Google:
https://grow.google/ai
2/ NVIDIA:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-in/learn/ai-learning-essentials/
3/ Anthropic:
https://anthropic.skilljar.com/
4/ OpenAI:
https://academy.openai.com/
5/ IBM:
https://skillsbuild.org/
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @codewithimraan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
You’re part of this coding & AI community. Which one describes you best?
🤔 I’m just exploring coding & AI21%
🌍 I’m from another country10%
🇮🇳 Indian, but living abroad8%
🇮🇳 I’m from India77%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Code Wars @code_wars_official · 43,740 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Webdevelopment657 @webdevelopment657 · 22,266 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
Webaddicted.in @web_addicted9 · 34,218 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Codewithrandom @Codewithrandom · 229,782 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Developer's Home👨💻 @developperHome · 68,070 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Codewith_muhilan @codewith_muhilan · 23,613 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
TCW - AI & Coding Resources 🚀👨💻 @the_coding_wizard · 177,960 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Placement Ducat @placementducatindia · 36,207 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
TheSanskaarSingh @codeslearningTG · 270,890 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Coders World @codersworld1 · 149,059 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Coding Resources @CodingResourcees · 43,474 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Poly Wala Technic @UttarPradeshPolytechnic · 22,596 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 September 2026
Coding_knowledge @coding_knwledge01 · 78,396 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Great Learning Academy @GreatLearningAcademy · 153,472 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“codewithimraan” (@codewithimraan), 14,904 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codewithimraan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.