Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO:PENTEST

Channel

PRO:PENTEST

@pro_pentest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,102subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964734189
TypeChannel
Username@pro_pentest
Created22 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_pentest

Growth

10,10210,15610,1296 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,146 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,145 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,128 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,119 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,116 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,117 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,111 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,110 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,112 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,102 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 32 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,094–10,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:3810,102-10
4 Sept 2026, 09:5610,112+2
1 Sept 2026, 20:2710,110+1
31 Aug 2026, 21:4710,109-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:0410,110-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:0510,113+1
28 Aug 2026, 22:1210,112+2
27 Aug 2026, 21:0210,110+2
26 Aug 2026, 19:3410,108-1
25 Aug 2026, 21:3410,109-3
24 Aug 2026, 22:1610,112-7
23 Aug 2026, 08:5410,119+6
21 Aug 2026, 19:2410,113+2
20 Aug 2026, 18:2310,111+3
19 Aug 2026, 15:4810,108-6
18 Aug 2026, 14:2410,114-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:1410,117+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:2710,116-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:2510,119-1
13 Aug 2026, 04:0310,120first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 10,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held23 (9 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total3,050
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18352.1%
❤‍🔥5214.8%
👍4512.8%
😁236.55%
113.13%
🤝92.56%
82.28%
👎82.28%
😎61.71%
👏30.855%
🫡30.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pro_pentest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,380 views19 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @kapibara_podkastPhoto

⚡️🎙 Выпуск 21! 🥷 В этот раз к нам заглянул Итан Хант Егор Зайцев, автор канала PRO:PENTEST. Егор рассказал настолько интересную информацию про физический пентест, что, во-первых, у нас получился самый долгий выпуск (но при этом и один из самых интересных), а во-вторых, это уже почти настоящие шпионские игры. Включайте и слушайте сами)) Все аудио площадки где можно нас услышать - размещены здесь (на некоторых площа

🔥116😎2

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,670 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет!❤️ Осталось 3,5 часа до конца набора 1 группы обучения. На данный момент это 18 человек🥂 Если планируешь обучаться по старой цене - поторопись. Цена для второго потока будет пересмотрена. 😭 Спасибо всем, кто пришел за уникальными знаниями и умениями, всем хорошего вечера🫡 UPD: ⚠️ Набор в группу закрыт! Запись на следующий поток по ссылке

🔥101👍1

8 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,530 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, всем привет! 🤝 Продолжается набор в первую группу курса по Физическому пентесту. 🥷 Сбор заявок заканчивается 12 числа. Старт занятий - 19 августа в 19:30. Потенциальные вопросы: 1) Почему сбор заявок до 12 числа? - Стартовые посылки для практики будут доставлены всем практически в одно время (Студент, который пришел после 12 числа получит свой первый бокс через 2-3 недели - это неудобно и растягивает обучени

🔥15🤝4👍3😁2

6 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈2,560 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, всем привет! Практически всем выслал инвайты в личные сообщения с дальнейшими инструкциями по обучению.

🔥9🫡3🤝2

3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,890 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! На текущий момент новости по курсу следующие. 1. Обновлена программа, разработаны большие и интересные опорные презентации 2. Служба безопасности уже выполнила часть проверок В ближайшее время я начну связываться с теми, кто успешно прошел этот этап - пока это 17 человек (ссылка на регистрацию для новых участников) 3. Для участников готовятся старт боксы для практических заданий Подробности пока ра

🔥27❤‍🔥6

27 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC≈3,110 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Друзья, пока я собирал материал для "Интенсива" понял, что как такового интенсива не получится и это будет полноценный курс (без изменения цены), поскольку я искренне не понимаю как сделать сокращенный вариант того, что не сокращается. Поэтому участники получат полноценное обучение в онлайне, про оффлайн я тоже думал, но это следующий этап и он как вы понимаете будет дорогим и скорее всего это оффер для

❤‍🔥12👍5🔥4

25 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈4,330 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, для курса по Физическому пентесту пока не понятна аудитория и ее спрос, поэтому было принято решение делать все поэтапно и неспеша. Долго прокручивая разные мысли в голове я пришел к выводу, что наиболее удачным решением для конечного потребителя прямо сейчас будет интенсив, курс сформирую позже учитывая спрос. Если ты хотел бы окунуться в это направление и понять - а как оно работает под капотом - велком.

🔥16👍5❤‍🔥3👎3

21 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC≈3,600 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Разница между джуном и Сеньером в НЛМК Оставляйте в комментариях вашего Маскота😄

😁20

20 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC≈3,500 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Если вы CISO и у вас остался бюджет — не тратьте его на ещё один отчёт. У бюджета на кибербезопасность обычно два финала. Первый — он превращается в реальное снижение рисков. Второй — в очередную закупку, красивый отчёт и несколько сотен найденных уязвимостей, которые так и остаются в бэклоге. Во второй половине года многие руководители ИБ начинают распределять остаток бюджета, заложенного на развитие, выполнение

🔥6👍31😁1😎1

17 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC≈3,700 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Взлом Киностудии Видео формат для новых подписчиков, чтобы не читать статью, приятного просмотра! https://youtu.be/kXtJ8EfHUwk

❤‍🔥10🔥5👍4😎32👏2

13 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈4,400 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет! Я как-то собрал дорожную карту по работе с внешней инфраструктурой, но забыл поделиться ею с вами, поэтому теперь доступна новая редактируемая версия. Ценность этого документа не в том, чтобы слепо копировать действия, а в том, чтобы вы наложите на текущую версию свой опыт, знания и навыки. Это позволит освежить в памяти важные моменты, выстроить в единую структуру свои заметки и довести работу

🔥10👍5❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @pro_pentest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Белый хакер
@bezopasno_soft · 29,691
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,457
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,236
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,216
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Mr. Robot
@elliot_cybersec · 39,084
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,846
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,680
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 46,119
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 39,432
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
ZeroDay | Кибербезопасность
@cybersec_academy · 42,850
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 36,955
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,214
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 228,204
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 41,636
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 61,439
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 125,064
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 47,551
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 83,998
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO:PENTEST” (@pro_pentest), 10,102 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_pentest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.