Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OFFZONE

Channel

OFFZONE

@offzone_moscow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,333subscribers

+376 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147044567
TypeChannel
Username@offzone_moscow
Created2 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/offzone_moscow

Growth

6,9577,3497,1536 August 2026 — 6,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,959 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,009 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,044 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,335 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,349 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,334 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,332 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,333 subscribers7,3336 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +376. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,898–7,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 15:397,333+1
31 Aug 2026, 00:457,332-2
28 Aug 2026, 05:257,334-15
25 Aug 2026, 08:527,349+14
22 Aug 2026, 08:157,335+219
19 Aug 2026, 05:337,116+72
16 Aug 2026, 15:367,044+35
12 Aug 2026, 16:557,009+35
9 Aug 2026, 13:016,974+15
6 Aug 2026, 11:306,959+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,957no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:426,957first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 7,333 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held60 (26 June 202620 August 2026)
Views total48,086
Reactions total826
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 34s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,309 reactions across 53 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 533699265053485764150838.8%
custom 533941019743146202634526.4%
custom 533727944268108015729922.8%
custom 5474563463797832388916.95%
custom 5199808599076938364665.04%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

😌 Зацените атмосферу на Tattoo.Zone Желающих забиться, как всегда, много. Мы и сами уже успели, а вы?

custom 53369926505348576411custom 53372794426810801571custom 53394101974314620261

20 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC460 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Насыпьте лайков монтажеру за хук в начале, пожалуйста 🌱

custom 533699265053485764116custom 51998085990769383641

20 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC582 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026

OSINT mindset на сегодня сворачивают стенд, завтра вернутся к вам со свежими тасками 🏁

custom 53369926505348576417custom 53372794426810801573custom 53394101974314620262

20 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC672 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🌠 Отправляйтесь в зону CUB_3 и разгадайте все тайны происшествия В лаборатории пропал один из топ-менеджеров, и, кажется, в этом виноваты подозрительные аномалии. Участвуйте в игре, чтобы выяснить, что случилось с нашим коллегой и чем закончился инцидент. Зона CUB_3 участвует и в общем квесте, так что сюда точно стоит заглянуть. Самые умелые смогут заработать много офкоинов. Кстати, аддон с бизоном можно получить р

custom 53369926505348576414custom 53372794426810801574custom 53394101974314620263

20 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC761 viewsread 20 August 2026

Все аддоны от Владислава были выиграны! Но не все их забрали. Напоминаем, что вам нужна зона BI.ZONE.

20 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC891 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кто зайку потерял?

custom 533727944268108015713custom 53394101974314620266custom 51998085990769383643custom 53369926505348576413

20 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC921 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

В 17:30 у точки входа в CyberCity «К2 Кибербезопасность» разыгрывает Steam Deck и крутой мерч. Чтобы участвовать, успейте решить 7 заданий и приходите испытать удачу 🌠

custom 53372794426810801574custom 53394101974314620262custom 54745634637978323881

20 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,010 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

В таске от Владислава Корчагина была проблема с сохранением шаблонов и чтением флага. Сейчас все снова работает. И кстати, еще можно получить аддон!

custom 51998085990769383643custom 53369926505348576412custom 53372794426810801571

20 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,020 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Успели пообедать? Если бегаете от доклада к активностям, а от активностей — за мерчем, пора сделать перерыв. Например, зайти за кофе к ребятам из «Человек и пароход». Мы уже затестили — очень вкусно 🔵

custom 533941019743146202612custom 53372794426810801576custom 54745634637978323883

20 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC892 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @bizone_bugbountyPhoto

🪲 Bug Bounty на OFFZONE выглядит примерно так CTF, OSINT, ребусы про уязвимости и «Кинь палку» — выбирайте активность по вкусу. За участие раздаем мерч, сладости, напитки и другие подарки.

custom 547456346379783238810custom 53394101974314620267custom 53372794426810801575

19 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,250 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

😏OFFZONE Museum Incident 🙂‍↕️ Ciao, ragazzi! Соглашаясь на сомнительные предложения от местных аномалий, всегда помните, что у них своеобразные представления о чувстве прекрасного. И никогда не говорите им, что в творческом ресерче «нет никакой пользы для бизнеса». Менеджер К допустил подобную ошибку, и теперь двое суток ему предстоит путешествовать по мирам, в которых его заточил Медиатор. Узнать, чем закончился

custom 533727944268108015710custom 53394101974314620267custom 51998085990769383644

19 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 533699265053485764118custom 53394101974314620269

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @offzone_moscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTCAnonymous Poll453 voters

Так что за слово из 6 букв

  1. Эльдар18%
  2. hackadvisor5%
  3. Волчок8%
  4. Андрей6%
  5. r0hack25%
  6. Пивко37%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,214
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 36,935
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 37,739
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 83,998
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,849
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 47,551
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 61,439
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,457
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 119,893
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,680
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 39,389
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 46,139
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 41,627
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,216
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OFFZONE” (@offzone_moscow), 7,333 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offzone_moscow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.